<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">WCD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Weather and Climate Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">WCD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Weather Clim. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2698-4016</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/wcd-7-1681-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Towards understanding the interannual variability of hail in Switzerland</article-title><alt-title>Interannual variability of hail</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wilhelm</surname><given-names>Lena</given-names></name>
          <email>lena.wilhelm@unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2666-8378</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Feldmann</surname><given-names>Monika</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-5415</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schröer</surname><given-names>Katharina</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2535-6658</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schwierz</surname><given-names>Cornelia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-1677</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Martius</surname><given-names>Olivia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-4702</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Geography and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Social Sciences and Geography, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lena Wilhelm (lena.wilhelm@unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1681</fpage><lpage>1707</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Lena Wilhelm et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026.html">This article is available from https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e139">Hailstorms are among the most damaging natural hazards in Switzerland, yet the large-scale processes governing their interannual variability remain poorly understood, limiting the potential for early prediction and risk preparedness. Using a 64-year reconstruction of past hail days (1959–2022) and ERA5 reanalysis data, we identify the dominant atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface patterns associated with particularly active hail seasons north and south of the Swiss Alps.</p>

      <p id="d2e142">In both regions, active hail seasons are associated with recurrent large-scale circulation anomalies, characterized by a zonally or meridionally oriented Euro-Atlantic wave train, together with seasonally preconditioned background states in sea-surface temperatures, near-surface temperature, and the mid-tropospheric circulation. These conditions promote repeated occurrences of hail-favorable environments with warm and moist boundary layers, enhanced instability, and moderate convective inhibition. The identified patterns differ significantly from those in hail-sparse seasons and exhibit distinct regional differences: north of the Alps, moisture supply is linked primarily to Atlantic influences and continental evaporation, and the strongest seasonal-scale anomalies occur in temperature, indicating a predominantly temperature-limited regime. South of the Alps, hail activity is associated with frequent elevated dry-layer conditions and a stronger contribution from Mediterranean moisture, occurring in a generally more convection-favorable environment with weaker seasonal-scale anomalies. We further find wintertime precursors of active hail seasons, including continental cooling and Pacific SST anomalies resembling a positive Pacific Decadal Oscillation phase, pointing to low-frequency preconditioning through large-scale teleconnection pathways. Together, these results identify consistent circulation regimes and precursor signals that could underpin (sub-)seasonal hail prediction in Switzerland and Central Europe.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung</funding-source>
<award-id>CRSII5201792</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e154">Severe convective storms were the most damaging natural hazard globally in 2023 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.1"/> and future hail-related losses are projected to increase, as both the severity and frequency of hailstorms in Switzerland are expected to rise under climate change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.2"/>. Despite the growing relevance of hailstorms, critical knowledge gaps remain. While previous research has largely focused on long-term trends, much less attention has been paid to the climate variability that governs year-to-year fluctuations in hailstorm activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.3"/>. Understanding this interannual variability is crucial for improving seasonal forecasts and supporting risk mitigation, particularly for the (re-) insurance and agricultural sectors. The recent multidecadal reconstruction of hail day occurrences in Switzerland (1959–2022) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.4"/> enables long-term analyses of interannual variability for the first time, overcoming the limitations of sparse long-term observational hail datasets that have previously hampered such studies in Switzerland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e172">Systematic analyses of other seasonal climate extremes, such as precipitation, temperature, and moisture conditions, have shown that extreme seasons are influenced both by local processes and by persistent large-scale circulation and slowly varying land–ocean boundary conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.6"/>. Building on this perspective, we investigate the factors regulating hail frequency on seasonal timescales. Hail formation involves multiscale processes, from microphysical growth mechanisms, to mesoscale triggers of convective initiation, to synoptic-scale circulation patterns that establish and maintain the broader storm environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Within Doswell’s classical framework, severe convective storms form when the necessary ingredients for deep moist convection (instability, moisture, lift, and for organized storms vertical wind shear) coincide in space and time and are organized by mesoscale and synoptic forcing mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.8"/>. In the Alpine region, these interactions are further modulated by complex terrain, which creates air mass boundaries, influences boundary-layer circulations, and affects convective initiation pathways. For example, the convergence of nocturnal katabatic (downslope) flows may induce convective initiation on the southern side of the Alps, while daytime hailstorms frequently initiate over the foothills and propagate toward higher elevations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.9"/>. In addition, katabatic flows associated with downdrafts can trigger new hailstorms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.10"/>, and mountain valleys with lakes can modify low-level moisture and channel storm inflow, thereby supporting more frequent supercell development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e197">Although strong diurnal heating can occasionally erode CIN and trigger isolated convection, most deep convection requires mesoscale lifting mechanisms such as boundary-layer convergence, orographic ascent, or thermally driven local circulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.12"/>. Large-scale ascent associated with synoptic systems can weaken the capping inversion, but vertical velocities of only a few cm s<sup>−1</sup> are generally insufficient to initiate convection without mesoscale support <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.13"/>. In the Alps, differential heating between valleys and slopes generates valley-breeze and mountain-plain circulations that produce low-level convergence along ridges and crests, promoting afternoon lifting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.14"/>. This commonly serves as a trigger for convective initiation (CI) in the Prealpine foothills, where hail frequency is highest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e224">While mesoscale processes provide the localized lift needed for CI, large-scale dynamics shape the thermodynamic and kinematic environment in which convection develops. Synoptic systems modulate temperature advection, moisture transport, lapse rates, flow direction and vertical wind shear, all of which determine whether a mesoscale trigger leads to shallow convection, deep moist convection, or organized hailstorms. The most widespread and intense convective outbreaks occur when mesoscale initiation mechanisms operate within a synoptic environment already favorable for deep convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e231">In Central Europe hailstorms frequently develop ahead of upper-level troughs, where enhanced vertical wind shear and differential positive vorticity advection (i.e., increasing positive vorticity advection with height) support deep convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.17"/>. In northern Switzerland, hailstorms often accompany pre-frontal environments ahead of westerly or northwesterly cold fronts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.18"/>. In southern Switzerland and northern Italy, major hail events have been linked to southwesterly flow downstream of Scandinavian or British Isles low-pressure systems, which transport high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (equivalent potential temperature) air from the Mediterranean into the Alps and generate shear profiles favorable for supercells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.19"/>. Cold fronts and pre-frontal environments to the west and north of the Alps also play an important role in these regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.20"/>. In addition, atmospheric blocking over the North Atlantic, Scandinavia, and the Baltic Sea can enhance hail frequency by maintaining persistent large-scale circulation patterns that favor the advection of warm, moist, and unstable air into Central Europe while inhibiting the eastward progression of weather systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.21"/>. Such long-lived circulation regimes have been associated with serially clustered hail occurrence in Switzerland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.22"/> and more than half of radar-based potential hail tracks in Germany over the last 2 decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.23"/>. Furthermore, blocking has been shown to increase the frequency of upstream PV cutoffs, providing mesoscale forcing for convective initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e270">On subseasonal to seasonal timescales, hail variability has been linked to large-scale modes of variability and their associated teleconnections. These modes offer potential for (sub-)seasonal predictive skill due to their low-frequency variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.25"/>. Teleconnections between remote climate forcing and severe storm frequency have been extensively studied in the United States <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.26"/>, where the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) are key modulators of severe weather on seasonal and subseasonal timescales.</p>
      <p id="d2e279">For Europe, instead, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Arctic Oscillation (AO), East Atlantic (EA), and Scandinavian (SCAND) patterns have been identified as key modulators of thunderstorm and hailstorm variability on seasonal and yearly timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.27"/>. While the influence of the NAO on convective activity appears to be complex and regionally dependent, positive phases of the EA and SCAND patterns have consistently been associated with storm-favorable circulation and thermodynamic conditions across parts of Central Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.28"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e288">Persistent surface anomalies, which are strongly modulated by atmospheric circulation, also contribute to hailstorm frequency variability. Positive summer sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the Bay of Biscay or the Mediterranean have been linked to enhanced convective activity over western Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.29"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.30"/> further report intensified thunderstorm activity across much of central Europe during positive Mediterranean SST anomalies in combination with Scandinavian blocking. Additionally, reduced Arctic sea ice can modify meridional temperature gradients and jet stream configurations, thereby influencing the occurrence of extreme weather <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.31"/>. Soil moisture can influence near surface weather on weekly to monthly timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.32"/>. Strong soil moisture gradients can generate mesoscale circulations, enhance low-level convergence, and even modify vertical wind shear through strengthened temperature gradients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.33"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e306">All of these potential influences on hail frequency highlight the strong coupling between the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface, and underscore the role of dynamical processes in shaping convective environments. In weather and climate models, small perturbations in the large-scale flow can amplify downstream <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.34"/>, cascading into substantial differences in convective environments. Improving our understanding of how hail-favorable conditions are generated, maintained, and modulated by mesoscale and synoptic dynamics is therefore essential for reducing uncertainties in process understanding, forecasting, and also for climate projections. Despite growing recognition of the diverse drivers of interannual hail variability, region-specific studies remain scarce. To address this gap, we investigate a range of atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface conditions across multiple timescales to better understand the interannual variability of hail in Switzerland. Specifically, we address the following questions: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e314">What large-scale and local atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface conditions are associated with active hail seasons in Switzerland?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e318">How do these conditions differ between northern and southern Switzerland?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e322">How do seasonal mean conditions during active hail seasons compare with the conditions on hail and non-hail days within those seasons?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e326">Which precursor signals are associated with active hail seasons?</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e329">The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the datasets, followed by the methodology in Sect. 3. Results are presented in Sect. 4 and discussed in Sect. 5. Conclusions are provided in Sect. 6.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Hail day time series</title>
      <p id="d2e347">Since systematic hail observations are not available before 2002 in Switzerland, we use the recently developed hail day reconstruction by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.35"/>. This dataset provides a binary time series indicating daily hail occurrence for two study areas, north and south of the Alps within the Swiss radar domain, which also includes parts of southern France, southern Germany, and northern Italy, during the hail-prone months (April–September) from 1959 to 2022 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). For simplicity, these two study areas are hereafter referred to as northern and southern Switzerland, respectively. To reconstruct past hail events, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.36"/> applied an ensemble statistical model that combines a radar-based hail proxy with ERA5-derived environmental predictors. For further details, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.37"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e363">The shading indicates the two study areas north of the Alps (blue) and south of the Alps (orange). The areas are within a 140 km radius of the five MeteoSwiss weather radars (black circles) overlaid on a digital elevation map (gray shading). Digital elevation map © Federal Office of Topography Swisstopo.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>ERA5 data</title>
      <p id="d2e380">We use ERA5 reanalysis data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.38"/> to study atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface variables, using hourly data from 1959 to 2022 at a 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° grid resolution, including pressure-level, single-level, and land-surface variables. A list of variables and a short description can be found in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA3"/>. Daily anomalies are calculated for all ERA5 variables with respect to a climatological mean and standard deviation estimated from moving windows, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.39"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.40"/>. To reduce the influence of long-term thermodynamic trends (e.g., warming-driven increases in instability), daily anomalies are calculated with respect to a mean and standard deviation estimated from an 8-year moving window, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.41"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.42"/>. Additionally, a 30 d moving window centered on each calendar day is used to remove the seasonal cycle. This approach retains low-frequency climate variability, thereby allowing the analysis to focus on circulation-related effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e408">Blocking frequencies were computed from 6-hourly ERA5 potential vorticity (PV) fields using the contour-tracking tool ConTrack, developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="text.43"/> building on the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.44"/>. Potential vorticity (PV) cutoffs and PV streamers are identified following the definitions of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.45"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="text.46"/>, and tracked with the algorithm described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.47"/> using the same 6-hourly ERA5 PV fields. The detection procedure delineates cutoff cyclones and streamers by tracing the 2-PVU contour on five isentropic levels between 330 and 350 K. Daily frequencies are then computed, whereby a grid point is classified as having a cutoff or streamer if a detection occurs on any of the five levels. To investigate the recurrence and strength of synoptic patterns we compute the R metric as introduced in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.48"/> for the 500 and 300 hPa meridional wind. R is calculated for the latitudes 35–65 and 40–70° N for north and south respectively. High R values indicate a high recurrence of the 500 and 300 hPa large-scale flow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Modes of variability time series</title>
      <p id="d2e438">To assess potential large-scale atmospheric influences on hail activity, we analyze relevant northern hemispheric modes of variability, including monthly time series of the Arctic Oscillation (AO), East Atlantic (EA) pattern, East Atlantic/Western Russia (EAWR) pattern, East Pacific/North Pacific (EPNP) pattern, El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Polar/Eurasia (POLEUR) pattern, Scandinavian (SCAND) pattern, and West Pacific (WP) pattern. These indices are obtained from the Climate Prediction Center of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and are computed from NCEP-NCAR1 reanalysis data following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.49"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.50"/>. To quantify relationships between these large-scale atmospheric patterns and regional hail activity, we calculate correlations between the monthly and annually aggregated hail day time series and each mode of variability (see Figs. <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/>). Correlations are computed over various temporal periods, including seasonal (i.e., DJF, MAM, JJA, SON), annual, monthly, and preceding periods (i.e., the cold season before the hail season and the previous year's SON).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Identifying active hail seasons</title>
      <p id="d2e467">The reconstructed hail day time series from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.51"/> forms the basis for identifying the years with a high and low hail activity in each study region. To isolate interannual variability and avoid bias toward recent decades, we first remove the long-term positive trend by linearly detrending the annual hail day time series (see Fig. 9 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="altparen.52"/>). We then select the ten most and least active hail seasons in both the northern and southern regions which correspond to the 15 % least and most active seasons of the investigation period (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). The two regions share five of the ten most active seasons (1963, 1970, 1994, 2003, 2017) and four of the ten least active seasons (1961, 1980, 1984, 2021). Notably, although 2021 is widely recognized as an exceptional hail year in Switzerland, it is classified among the least active hail seasons because the season was dominated by only a few exceptionally severe hail outbreaks rather than frequent hail days. The distinction between hailstorm severity and seasonal hail-day frequency of 2021 is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.53"/>. In both regions, hail days during the most active seasons are not confined to a single month but occur repeatedly throughout the peak convective period (June–August), with few additional events at the beginning and end of the hail season (April, May, September; see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA6"/>).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e486">The ten most and least active hail seasons (from the detrended series) in the northern and southern study regions, sorted chronologically.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Most Active Seasons</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Least Active Seasons</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">North</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1963, 1970, 1971, 1982, 1983</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1961, 1962, 1974, 1978, 1980</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1993, 1994, 2003, 2017, 2018</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1984, 1991, 1998, 2020, 2021</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">South</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1963, 1965, 1967, 1970, 1994</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1961, 1977, 1980, 1984, 1990</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1998, 2003, 2012, 2017, 2019</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1996, 2004, 2011, 2014, 2021</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Anomaly composites</title>
      <p id="d2e568">To investigate the large-scale atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface conditions associated with active hail seasons, we compute daily anomalies for selected ERA5 variables (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA3"/>) across the Northern Hemisphere. Anomalies are calculated relative to a mean and standard deviation estimated from a 30 day, 8-year moving window, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.54"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.55"/>. We then calculate composite mean fields for two time windows: (i) the full hail season (April–September) and (ii) the preceding cold season (October–March), to identify potential precursors. Hail-season composites are computed over all days in April–September, rather than only hail days, to capture the background conditions that favor frequent hailstorm formation, rather than the instantaneous environment during individual events. Cold-season composites are likewise computed over all days in October–March. All composites are calculated separately for the ten most active hail seasons in the northern and southern regions. Hail-season composites are shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>, while cold-season composites are presented in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA3"/>. Additional time windows were tested (e.g., monthly composites, the peak hail season (JJA), the preceding DJF, and adjacent years), but these did not provide further insight, indicating that the relevant signals are captured within the selected periods. Statistical significance is assessed using a two-sided bootstrap test (1000 samples), comparing composites of the most active and inactive seasons against the 5th and 95th percentile thresholds of randomly sampled means.</p>
      <p id="d2e594">Note that the full analysis was also conducted for the ten least active hail seasons. These exhibit largely opposing significant patterns compared to active seasons, indicating that the associated large-scale conditions differ between active and inactive hail seasons. While not discussed in detail to maintain brevity and focus, these contrasting signals are climatologically plausible and support the robustness of the identified relationships. Corresponding additional figures are provided in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d2e597">To assess differences between these seasonal background conditions and event-scale environments, we additionally compute anomalies separately for hail days and non-hail days. Specifically, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> present composites for five subsets: (1) all non-hail days (1959–2022), (2) non-hail days during the ten most active hail seasons, (3) all hail days (1959–2022), (4) hail days during the ten most active seasons, and (5) the seasonal mean over all days in April–September during the ten most active seasons. This comparison allows us to disentangle the environmental conditions on hail days from the broader seasonal background preconditioning during active hail seasons.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Atmospheric, ocean and land-surface conditions during active hail seasons</title>
      <p id="d2e613">This section presents the key atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface patterns during active hail seasons in northern and southern Switzerland.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Northern Switzerland</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Large-scale conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e630">To provide an overview of the large-scale circulation and synoptic environment during the most active hail seasons in northern Switzerland, we first analyze composites of 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500), 300 hPa wind speed, blocking, cutoff and streamer frequency, as well as SST for the entire hail season (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). During active hail seasons, the Z500 composites reveal a pronounced upper-level anomaly pattern across the North Atlantic-European sector (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a). The alternating positive and negative geopotential height anomalies point to the recurrent occurrence of a zonally oriented Rossby wave train with a ridge–trough–ridge configuration, consisting of positive anomalies over the western Atlantic, a NNW–SSE-oriented negative anomaly over the eastern Atlantic and positive anomalies over Central Europe. Because these are seasonal-mean anomalies, they should not be interpreted as a single persistent synoptic configuration. Instead, they may reflect either persistent circulation anomalies or the repeated re-establishment of similar flow patterns, as examined below using the R-metric. Northern Switzerland lies on the western flank of the positive Z500 anomaly over Central Europe, where the 850 hPa flow is predominantly southerly (shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>d).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e641">Mean anomalies of large-scale atmospheric and oceanic variables during the ten most active hail seasons in northern Switzerland. (a) geopotential height at 500 hPa, (b) 300 hPa wind speed with mean climatology contours in black, (c) blocking frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, (d) cutoff low frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, (e) streamer frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, (f) SST. Stippling indicates areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The green box marks the study region in northern Switzerland.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e650">In individual synoptic situations, the western flank of a ridge ahead of an approaching trough is a dynamically active transition zone, commonly associated with large-scale ascent driven by differential vorticity advection and temperature advection, which promotes destabilization and supports convective development once a mesoscale trigger is present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.56"/>. Together with the enhanced deep-layer vertical wind shear typically associated with this synoptic configuration, these conditions create an environment conducive to hail-producing convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.57"/>. Composites of 500 hPa vertical velocity confirm the presence of large-scale ascent in this region (not shown). The potential vorticity anomaly pattern closely mirrors that of Z500, with negative PV anomalies collocated with positive geopotential height anomalies and positive PV anomalies associated with troughs (Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e662">To determine whether the seasonal anomaly pattern during active hail seasons reflects persistent circulation anomalies or the repeated occurrence of similar synoptic configurations, we examine the recurrence (R-metric) of the 500 hPa meridional wind between 35 and 65° N throughout the year (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). The R-metric represents the recurrence of similar large-scale flow patterns on subseasonal timescales. Significant positive R anomalies are present across most of the hail season over the study area and Central Europe, indicating that during active hail seasons, similar large-scale ridge–trough configurations are repeatedly re-established rather than maintained as a single persistent circulation anomaly. During mid-summer (July), recurrence is also significantly enhanced downstream of the study area, suggesting frequent re-establishment of anticyclonic flow over Central Europe rather than a single quasi-stationary anticyclone, consistent with the negative blocking anomalies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c). Recurrence is also significantly increased near the beginning and end of the hail season over the North Atlantic and North America.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e671">Mean anomalies of the R-metric of 500 hPa meridional wind (averaged between 35 and 65° N) for the ten most active hail seasons in northern Switzerland. Red colors denote enhanced recurrence, and blue colors indicate reduced recurrence relative to climatology. Stippling marks areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The grey vertical dashed lines highlight the longitudinal sector of the study region, and the black horizontal dashed lines indicate the beginning and end of the Swiss hail season.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e680">The alternating positive–negative–positive Z500 anomaly pattern exhibits a pronounced meridional extent, associated with a northward-displaced upper level jet over the Atlantic and locally larger than average 300 hPa wind speeds south of Greenland and over the western Atlantic, while windspeeds are reduced over the Mediterranean, consistent with a weakened subtropical jet there (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b). Blocking frequency anomalies are negative over most of North America, the Atlantic, Europe and East Asia, and positive only over parts of Scandinavia, although not significant (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c). The negative anomalies are significant west of the British Isles and over Russia, consistent with the negative Z500 anomalies. Cutoff and PV-streamer frequencies exhibit generally small anomalies, with locally significant positive values for cutoffs over the Bay of Biscay and the British Isles, slightly downstream of the eastern Atlantic trough, as well as over the Mediterranean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>d,e). Negative anomalies are found south of Greenland, but all deviations remain below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.</p>
      <p id="d2e699">SST anomalies broadly follow the upper-level circulation, with positive values in the western Atlantic and Mediterranean and negative values in the eastern Atlantic and the Labrador Sea (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>f). The strongest positive SST anomalies occur in the northern Mediterranean. Previous studies have shown that SST variability can modulate severe  convective activity by affecting boundary-layer specific humidity and mixed-layer CAPE, both on global scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.58"/> or regionally over the US by changes in the Gulf of Mexico SSTs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.59"/>. Sea-ice cover anomalies display positive anomalies in the Labrador Sea and negative anomalies east of Greenland (see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA2"/>). The sea ice cover anomalies could either arise from,  and/or reinforce the underlying SST-driven thermal contrasts.</p>
      <p id="d2e712">Overall, these large-scale anomaly patterns indicate that hail-active seasons are characterized not by a single persistent circulation anomaly, but by the repeated re-establishment of a synoptic configuration favorable for hail formation. The recurrent ridge–trough–ridge Rossby wave train promotes southerly warm and moist air advection into northern Switzerland, while repeated upstream trough passages provide dynamical forcing for ascent and convective initiation. Positive SST anomalies in the Mediterranean and the Bay of Biscay may further enhance lower-tropospheric moisture availability. Together, these factors establish a favorable large-scale background state for recurrent hail-producing convection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Local thermodynamic and land surface conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e723">Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.60"/>, the favorable large-scale circulation described above must establish a local thermodynamic environment conducive to hail formation, characterized by sufficient instability and moisture availability. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows composite anomalies of key thermodynamic and stability indicators during the active hail seasons. A positive temperature anomaly is located underneath the positive anomaly over Central and Eastern Europe, both at the surface and at 850 hPa (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a, b). The surface temperature anomaly over land is almost twice as large as the anomaly over the Mediterranean. Near-surface and lower-tropospheric specific humidity anomalies are positive over the study area, southern and Central Europe and the Mediterranean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c, d). Over the Mediterranean the 850 hPa specific humidity anomalies are smaller compared to the surface anomalies and are not statistically significant (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>d).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e739">Mean anomalies of near-surface and lower-tropospheric thermodynamic and land-surface variables during the ten most active hail seasons in northern Switzerland. Shown are <bold>(a, b)</bold> temperature at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(c, d)</bold> specific humidity at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(e, f)</bold> relative humidity at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(g)</bold> convective available potential energy, <bold>(h)</bold> convective inhibition, <bold>(i)</bold> soil moisture and <bold>(j)</bold> surface latent heat flux. Positive values in panel <bold>(j)</bold> indicate enhanced upward latent heat flux from the surface to the atmosphere compared to the climatology (opposite to ERA5 convention). Black contours show 500 hPa geopotential height anomalies at 20 m intervals, the arrows in panel <bold>(d)</bold> indicate 850 hPa wind direction and speed. Stippling indicates statistical significance at the 95 % confidence level. The black box marks the study area in northern Switzerland.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e776">Relative humidity anomalies at 2 m and 850 hPa are slightly negative and not significant over the study area, but show significant negative values across much of Central and Eastern Europe despite the larger than average specific humidity values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>e, f). This contrast in the sign of specific versus relative humidity anomalies is consistent with the strong positive temperature anomalies, which increase the saturation vapor pressure. As a result, relative humidity decreases despite the increase in absolute moisture, indicating an enhanced vapor pressure deficit.</p>
      <p id="d2e782">The resulting warm and moist conditions at the surface and in the lower to mid troposphere are consistent with a favorable vertical thermodynamic profile that promotes enhanced instability, contributing to above-average CAPE and supporting the strong updrafts required for hail growth. Accordingly, CAPE anomalies are strongly positive over southern Central Europe and the Mediterranean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>g). CIN anomalies are positive across Central Europe, the study area, and the Adriatic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>h), consistent with the positive dependence of both CAPE and CIN on temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.61"/>. Moderate CIN can suppress premature convective initiation, allowing instability to accumulate and favoring more isolated, organized storms once sufficient lifting is present, whereas excessive CIN may inhibit convection. Together with favorable deep-layer vertical wind shear associated with the synoptic configuration, large CAPE and moderate CIN can promote organized, long-lived storms such as supercells, whose sustained strong updrafts provide favorable conditions for large-hail growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.62"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e795">Towards the western edge of the upper-level ridge (i.e. over the Pyrenees and Iberian Peninsula) CIN anomalies are weaker and become partly negative (not statistically significant). This could stem from the locally increased 2m specific humidity there, which, together with the positive temperature anomalies lead to reduced CIN and simultaneously increased CAPE. Over Portugal weakened subsidence warming or a local replacement by large-scale ascent associated with approaching troughs or fronts could also contribute to the reduced CIN.</p>
      <p id="d2e798">In the study area, soil-moisture anomalies are generally weak and not statistically significant. However, a pronounced west-east soil-moisture gradient extends across the surrounding region, with wetter-than-average conditions upstream over western France and significant dry anomalies downstream toward eastern Europe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>i). The dry region over Eastern Europe coincides with strong positive surface-temperature anomalies, consistent with land–atmosphere feedback processes. Surface latent heat flux anomalies over the study area are generally weak and not statistically significant. In contrast, significant positive latent heat flux anomalies occur over the Alps despite the absence of a clear soil-moisture signal, indicating enhanced surface evaporation and thus increased moisture uptake by the atmosphere (absolute latent heat fluxes remain positive, i.e., evaporation dominates; not shown). However, the interpretation of surface flux anomalies over the Alps requires particular caution in ERA5 given the complex topography and associated uncertainties. Further positive latent heat flux anomalies are found over the Iberian Peninsula and France, coinciding with wetter-than-average soil moisture conditions, although these anomalies are not statistically significant. Negative latent heat flux anomalies occur over the Mediterranean (significant) and across much of Germany and eastern Europe (not significant), consistent with reduced evaporation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Summary north</title>
      <p id="d2e811">In summary, active hail seasons north of the Alps are characterized by a pronounced mid-/upper-level, zonally oriented positive–negative–positive Z500 anomaly pattern over the Atlantic and Central Europe, associated with amplified meridional flow over the study area, a northwardly displaced jet over the Atlantic and a weakened subtropical jet over the Mediterranean. Recurrent flow conditions upstream and over Europe provide repeated large-scale forcing in the form of troughs upstream of western Europe during the season. The large-scale forcing meets favorable local thermodynamic conditions, including positive temperature and specific humidity anomalies over northern Switzerland and positive Mediterranean SST anomalies. The combination allows for the formation of warm and moist but unsaturated boundary layers and a favorable vertical thermodynamic structure, resulting in enhanced CAPE and moderate CIN. Moisture supply is linked primarily to evaporation from adjacent continental regions with wetter than average soils or to Atlantic influences. Together these conditions create a setting favorable for repeated hailstorm occurrence in northern Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Southern Switzerland</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Large-scale conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e830">Although northern and southern Switzerland are geographically close, the Alps constitute a climatic divide that separates distinct air-mass influences and flow regimes. As a result, the large-scale environments associated with active hail seasons differ substantially between the two regions. To investigate these contrasts, we now focus on southern Switzerland and analyze composites of Z500, 300 hPa wind speed, blocking, cutoff and streamer frequency, as well as SST anomalies for the entire hail season (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e837">Mean anomalies of large-scale atmospheric and oceanic variables during the ten most active hail seasons in southern Switzerland. <bold>(a)</bold> Geopotential height at 500 hPa, <bold>(b)</bold> 300 hPa wind speed with the climatology as black contours, <bold>(d)</bold> blocking frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, <bold>(e)</bold> cutoff low frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, <bold>(f)</bold> streamer frequency with mean climatology contours in darkblue, <bold>(g)</bold> SST. Stippling indicates areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The green box marks the study region in southern Switzerland.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e865">The 500 hPa geopotential height anomaly composites reveal a pronounced meridionally oriented wave pattern of positive and negative geopotential height anomalies over the North Atlantic sector (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a). These anomalies represent the recurrent occurrence of a synoptic configuration characterized by an extensive ridge over the northwestern Atlantic and Greenland, a southwest–northeast-oriented trough centered over the British Isles and northern Europe, and positive geopotential height anomalies south and southeast of the trough over the Mediterranean and southern Europe. This synoptic configuration is associated with pronounced southwesterly flow across Central Europe and an eastward extension of the upper-level jet over northern Europe and the eastern Atlantic (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>b). Southern Switzerland lies within the transition zone between the cyclonic and anticyclonic upper-level anomalies, where the associated synoptic configuration typically favors large-scale ascent, consistent with vertical velocity anomalies (not shown). The Greenland and North Atlantic positive geopotential height anomalies coincide with strong positive blocking frequency anomalies, indicating the frequent occurrence of anticyclonic flow in this sector (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c). The low frequency of stratospheric PV streamers and cutoff lows near the British Isles suggests that the trough remains embedded in the midlatitude westerly flow rather than evolving into an isolated cutoff (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d, e). This configuration facilitates coherent downstream Rossby wave propagation. In contrast, a positive PV streamer anomaly exists along the west coast of North Africa, within a region of climatologically positive geopotential height, and suggests that an anomalously large fraction of PV streamers extend unusually far south.</p>
      <p id="d2e877">To assess the temporal persistence of these circulation patterns, we again examine mean R-metric anomalies of the 500 hPa meridional wind between 40 and 70° N as a measure of subseasonal recurrence (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). Peak hail day frequency in southern Switzerland occurs in July and August. Significant positive R anomalies are found mainly from mid-July to September, predominantly upstream over the North Atlantic, reflecting the repeated occurrence of similar large-scale flow configurations, potentially linked to recurrent wave breaking upstream and downstream of the Greenland blocking anticyclone.</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e884">Mean anomalies of the R-metric of 500 hPa meridional wind (averaged between 40 and 70° N) for the ten most active hail seasons in southern Switzerland. The R-metric represents the spatial recurrence of similar large-scale flow patterns. Red colors denote enhanced recurrence, and blue colors indicate reduced recurrence relative to climatology. Stippling marks areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The grey vertical dashed lines highlight the longitudinal sector of the study region, and the black horizontal dashed lines indicate the beginning and end of the Swiss hail season.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e893">SST anomalies are weaker than in the composites for northern Switzerland, and fewer regions exhibit statistically significant signals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>f). The SST pattern broadly mirrors the upper-level circulation, with significant positive anomalies in the western North Atlantic, the Labrador Sea, the Beaufort Sea, and localized areas of the Mediterranean. Negative SST anomalies occur around the British Isles but are not statistically significant. Together, these oceanic anomalies are consistent with the large-scale circulation pattern and contribute to the background state that modulates surface and lower-tropospheric conditions over southern Europe.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Thermodynamic and land-surface conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e906">Composite anomalies of key near-surface and lower-tropospheric variables during active hail seasons south of the Alps are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. A positive temperature anomaly extends across southern Europe both at 2 m and at 850 hPa (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, b), consistent with the positive Z500 anomalies over the Mediterranean identified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a. The southern Switzerland domain lies north of the significantly positive temperature anomalies, in an area with neither significant positive nor significant negative temperature anomalies. Negative temperature anomalies dominate over Scandinavia and the British Isles (only significant at the surface). This dipole pattern creates a strong horizontal temperature gradient (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, b). Specific- and relative-humidity anomalies show a vertical contrast between the surface and the lower troposphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c, e and d, f). At 2 m, specific humidity anomalies are positive over the Mediterranean Sea but negative over the Iberian peninsula, indicating a moist marine boundary layer next to drier continental air (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c). Over southern Switzerland the 2 m specific moisture anomalies are positive but not significant. At 850 hPa, specific humidity anomalies are negative across the western Mediterranean Sea, indicating a dry layer aloft above the moist surface air (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d). Combined with positive temperature anomalies, this leads to reduced relative humidity over the Iberian Peninsula in both layers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, b and e, f). There are no significant relative humidity anomalies directly over southern Switzerland. The southwesterly flow at 850 hPa suggests the advection of warm, relatively dry air from the Iberian Peninsula toward southern Switzerland, potentially establishing a dry elevated layer repeatedly throughout the season (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d). CAPE over southern Switzerland is marginally higher compared to the climatology (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g). In this area, the climatological CAPE values are already high, similar as over the Mediterranean. CIN anomalies over southern Switzerland are significantly positive (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>h). This combination can support intense convection once forced ascent (either orographic or synoptic) erodes the capping inversion.</p>
      <p id="d2e932">Soil-moisture anomalies exhibit a pronounced north-south gradient that closely mirrors the Z500 and temperature anomaly patterns (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>i). Regions with positive temperature anomalies correspond to negative soil-moisture anomalies, indicating warm and dry conditions over southern Europe and the Mediterranean dominating during the season. There are no significant soil moisture anomalies locally in the study area. Significant surface latent heat flux anomalies are found over the Iberian Peninsula, Italy, and parts of southern Germany, where negative anomalies indicate reduced upward fluxes, despite evaporation remaining positive in absolute terms (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>j). In contrast, the Mediterranean Sea exhibits localized positive latent heat flux anomalies, indicating enhanced evaporation and suggesting that the Mediterranean acts as a more important moisture source for the atmosphere than local land-surface evaporation during hail-active seasons.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e941">Mean anomalies of near-surface and lower-tropospheric thermodynamic and land-surface variables during the ten most active hail seasons in southern Switzerland. Shown are <bold>(a, b)</bold> temperature at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(c, d)</bold> specific humidity at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(e, f)</bold> relative humidity at 2 m and 850 hPa, <bold>(g)</bold> convective available potential energy, <bold>(h)</bold> convective inhibition, <bold>(i)</bold> soil moisture and <bold>(j)</bold> surface latent heat flux. Positive values in panel <bold>(j)</bold> indicate enhanced upward latent heat flux from the surface to the atmosphere compared to the climatology (opposite to ERA5 convention). Black contours show 500 hPa geopotential height anomalies at 30 m intervals, the arrows in panel <bold>(d)</bold> indicate 850 hPa wind direction and speed. Stippling indicates statistical significance at the 95 % confidence level. The black box marks the study area in southern Switzerland.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><title>Summary south</title>
      <p id="d2e986">In summary, active hail seasons south of the Alps are associated with a large-scale dipole pattern, featuring enhanced blocking and high pressure over Greenland, low pressure over the British Isles, and high pressure across southern Europe and the Mediterranean. This configuration is associated with southwesterly flow over Central Europe, accompanied by sharp horizontal temperature and soil moisture gradients. At the surface, conditions are typically moist over the Mediterranean but drier over adjacent continental regions, while the lower troposphere over the western Mediterranean contains an elevated dry layer likely advected from the Iberian Peninsula leading to moderately high CIN anomalies in the study area and the Mediterranean. Repeated wave breaking downstream of the Greenland block favors recurrent trough development north of the Alps, which may exert downstream influences on convective initiation and organization south of the Alpine crest trough quasi-geostrophic forcing and (pre-)frontal environments. Compared to northern Switzerland local anomalies in the south are weaker in temperature, humidity and CAPE, suggesting that the southern domain is generally more predisposed to convection. Nevertheless, positive Mediterranean SST anomalies could support enhanced moisture transport toward southern Switzerland, further promoting hail activity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Comparison between seasonal composites and hail day composites</title>
      <p id="d2e1000">A central question in interpreting the previous seasonal composites is the extent to which the seasonal-mean anomalies are shaped by the environments on hail days themselves, as opposed to reflecting a seasonal “background state”. Unlike the R-metric, which assesses whether the seasonal circulation anomalies result from persistent or recurrent synoptic configurations, the following analysis examines whether the seasonal anomalies are primarily determined by hail-day environments or by the seasonal background conditions. This distinction helps identify which variables primarily reflect seasonal preconditioning and which are mainly associated with event-scale hail-day environments.</p>
      <p id="d2e1003">To answer this, we compare five sets of anomaly fields for northern and southern Switzerland (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>): (i) the mean over all non-hail days during 1959–2022 (row 1), (ii) the mean over non-hail days occurring within the ten most active hail seasons (row 2), (iii) the mean over all hail days during 1959–2022 (row 3), (iv) the mean over hail days within the ten most active hail seasons (row 4), and (v) the seasonal-mean anomalies of the ten most active hail seasons (row 5). Interpreting the comparisons between rows relies on two key relationships. Variables that already differ between the two non-hail day composites (rows 1 and 2) indicate seasonal preconditioning during active hail seasons. In contrast, variables that become substantially more anomalous on hail days (rows 3 and 4) than on non-hail days (rows 1 and 2) primarily reflect event-scale hail-day environments.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Northern Switzerland</title>
      <p id="d2e1017">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> shows that for northern Switzerland, the hail day composites (rows 3 and 4) exhibit a coherent ridge–trough configuration over Europe accompanied by warm near-surface temperatures, enhanced low-level moisture, elevated CAPE, and moderate CIN, which are features that closely resemble those found in the seasonal-mean composites (row 5). As expected, the magnitudes of the seasonal-mean anomalies are substantially weaker than those of the hail day-only composites, reflecting the inclusion of non-hail days that either display weaker anomalies or anomalies of opposite sign (row 1 and  2). This contrast is particularly evident when comparing the two non-hail day composites. The composite of all non-hail days (row 1) exhibits anomaly patterns that are largely opposite to those observed on hail days (rows 3 and 4) and in the seasonal means (row 5), including negative Z500 anomalies over Central and Eastern Europe, weakly negative Mediterranean SST anomalies, and negative anomalies in 2 m temperature, 850 hPa specific humidity, CAPE, and CIN over most of Central Europe; conditions that are generally unfavorable for convective storm development. In contrast, when restricting the composites of non-hail days to the most active hail seasons (row 2), the anomaly patterns more closely resemble those of the hail day and seasonal-mean composites (rows 3, 4, 5), particularly in Z500, SST and 2 m temperature. Z500 anomalies are positive over Europe, Mediterranean SSTs and surface temperature anomalies are predominantly positive across much of the continent, consistent with a background state conducive to hailstorm development (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>g,h,i). By contrast CAPE and CIN anomalies remain negative (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>k,l). Notably, the two non-hail day composites (rows 1 and 2) differ in sign primarily for Z500, SST, and surface temperature, while they remain similar for CAPE, CIN, and 850 hPa specific humidity. This indicates that large-scale circulation, SST, and surface temperature are already anomalous during non-hail days of active seasons, suggesting that they characterize the seasonal background state rather than conditions unique to hail days. In contrast, CAPE, CIN, and 850 hPa specific humidity remain similar between the two non-hail day composites but become substantially more anomalous on hail days, indicating that they primarily characterize event-scale hail-day environments rather than persistent seasonal preconditioning.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e1028">Composite anomalies of large-scale and thermodynamic variables during hail and non-hail periods for northern Switzerland. Shown are anomalies in 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500), sea surface temperature (SST), 2 m temperature (T2M), 850 hPa specific humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), convective available potential energy (CAPE), and convective inhibition (CIN). Rows represent (top to bottom): <bold>(a–f)</bold> mean anomalies over all non-hail days, <bold>(g–l)</bold> mean anomalies over non-hail days during the ten most active hail seasons, <bold>(m–r)</bold> mean anomalies over all hail days, <bold>(s–x)</bold> mean anomalies over hail days during the ten most active hail seasons, and <bold>(y–ad)</bold> seasonal means of the ten most active seasons (April–September). Note that the color scales are logarithmic to accommodate the wide range of anomalies across all five rows.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1064">The two hail day composites (rows 3 and 4) are themselves highly similar, demonstrating that hail days in average seasons and hail days in exceptionally active seasons arise from broadly the same type of environment. However, most anomalies are systematically stronger in the hail day composite of the most active seasons (row 4) than in the all-hail day composite (row 3; note the logarithmic color scaling used in the figure). This suggests that the physical processes associated with hail formation are qualitatively similar across seasons, but they occur with greater magnitude during particularly hail-active seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e1068">The relatively small differences between Mediterranean SST anomalies on non-hail days in the most active seasons (row 2), on hail days (rows 3 and 4), and in the seasonal means (row 5), together with the weakly negative SST anomalies on all non-hail days (row 1), indicate that warm SST anomalies persist throughout much of active seasons rather than being confined to individual hail events. This persistence is consistent with the large heat capacity of the ocean and the consequently slow evolution of SSTs. These anomalies may therefore either exert a sustained influence on the lower-tropospheric environment, e.g., by enhancing moisture availability, or simply reflect the prevailing large-scale circulation throughout the season. Surface temperature anomalies likewise remain positive in the seasonal-mean and hail day composites (rows 2–5) compared to all non-hail days (row 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Southern Switzerland</title>
      <p id="d2e1079">South of the Alps, the large-scale flow patterns evident in the seasonal means are again recognizable in the hail day composites, although the contrast between hail day and seasonal-mean anomalies is more pronounced than in northern Switzerland (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). On hail days, Z500 anomalies (rows 3 and 4) reveal a markedly stronger and more meridionally oriented trough-ridge configuration than in the seasonal mean (row 5), with the downstream ridge extending slightly farther into northeastern Europe. As in northern Switzerland, Mediterranean SST anomalies during hail days of the most active seasons are approximately twice as large as in the all-hail days composite and are also positive during non-haildays in the most active seasons (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>t, n, h). This indicates that warmer than average Mediterranean SSTs are a robust and persistent feature of hail-active summers in both regions, rather than being confined to individual hail events.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e1088">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>, but for southern Switzerland.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1099">Near-surface temperature, low-level specific humidity, and CAPE exhibit substantially stronger anomalies over the study area and much of Central Europe on hail days in the most active seasons (row 4) than in the all-hail days composite (row 3). This suggests not only that the frequency of hail events may be enhanced, but the higher CAPE could also promote stronger updrafts during the most active hail seasons. CIN anomalies in the all-hail days composite are predominantly negative over the study area, reflecting weaker convective inhibition during average hail seasons compared to the most active hail seasons. In contrast to northern Switzerland, the non-hail day composite within the most active hail seasons (row 2) south of the Alps shows little indication of favorable preconditioning in mean Z500, near-surface temperature, or low-level moisture. This implies that these variables alone do not distinguish active from inactive days during hail-rich seasons. However, Mediterranean SST anomalies remain positive, and CIN anomalies are stronger relative to the all non-hail days composite (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>l, f). This combination points to the generally more frequent presence of a capping inversion during active seasons, consistent with repeated advection of warm, relatively dry air aloft and the potential repeated establishment of an elevated mixed layer.</p>
      <p id="d2e1105">Comparing both non-hail day composites (rows 1 and 2) with the hail day composites (rows 3 and 4) further highlights that differences in anomaly sign over Central Europe, particularly in Z500, CAPE, 850 hPa specific humidity, and 2 m temperature, indicate that the availability of instability, moisture, warm near-surface conditions, and a favorable large-scale circulation must be considered jointly to distinguish hail from non-hail days. Overall, seasonal-mean anomalies south of the Alps are weaker than those found north of the Alps (not shown), reflecting that southern Switzerland is climatologically closer to the convective threshold. Consequently, hail formation south of the Alps appears to be less dependent on strong seasonal-scale thermodynamic preconditioning and more sensitive to synoptic and mesoscale triggers acting within a climatologically already favorable environment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Comparison of strongest anomalies per region</title>
      <p id="d2e1117">The results from the previous two Sections show that hail-active seasons arise from the repeated occurrence of favorable large-scale upper-level flow patterns acting within, or actively establishing, thermodynamically favorable environments. To discuss which of the seasonal mean anomalies seen has the highest relative strength across variables and between regions and potentially has the strongest effect on hail activity, we also computed seasonal mean composites in standard deviation units (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). This was done by dividing daily anomalies by the local hail-season standard deviation prior to compositing. In this framework, “strongest” denotes the largest standardized anomaly magnitude, i.e., the largest signal relative to typical background variability. Values are typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 because they represent seasonal means rather than individual-day extremes.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e1131">Standardized mean anomalies of key atmospheric and thermodynamic variables during the ten most active hail seasons north and south of the Alps. Panels show anomalies in 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500), sea surface temperature (SST), 2 m temperature (T2M), 850 hPa specific humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), convective available potential energy (CAPE), and convective inhibition (CIN) for the northern (top row) and southern (second row) regions. The third row shows the their difference (North <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> South), and the bottom row the absolute magnitude of those differences. All fields are standardized by their interannual variability, allowing direct comparison of anomaly strength across variables and regions.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1158">The standardized composites of Z500, SST, 2 m temperature, 850 hPa specific humidity, CAPE, and CIN reveal that active hail seasons north of the Alps are associated with markedly stronger surface and upper-level anomalies than those south of the Alps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). The <italic>largest</italic> anomalies occur in surface temperature and SST, highlighting that hail activity in northern Switzerland is <italic>temperature-limited</italic> as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.63"/>. As mentioned, south of the Alps, the same thermodynamic anomaly patterns emerge but with smaller amplitudes. This indicates that even modest deviations from the mean state are sufficient to enhance hail frequency in southern Switzerland, as the climatological environment is already thermodynamically favorable for convection. This north–south contrast is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.64"/>, who identified regions north of the Alps as a <italic>temperature-limited convective regime</italic> reliant on strong dynamical forcing, and the Alpine south and Mediterranean as a <italic>convectively favorable regime</italic> where weak synoptic perturbations can trigger storms, leading to more frequent convective outbreaks. Indeed there are overall more hail days south of the Alps (12 % of all days) than north of the Alps (10.3 %).</p>
      <p id="d2e1183">The comparison between seasonal means and hail-day-only composites further clarifies the interplay between the favorable background state throughout the active seasons and the conditions prevailing on individual hail days. In both regions, hail-day composites closely mirror the seasonal anomalies in Z500, CAPE, CIN, and near-surface thermodynamic fields, but with markedly stronger amplitudes, whereas non-hail days often display anomalies of opposite sign. In northern Switzerland active seasons are characterized not just by a single, persistent favorable background state or just by isolated extreme hail day environments, but by a combination of both, namely of a seasonally favorable preconditioned background (with positive sea and land surface temperatures) within which synoptic-scale or mesoscale disturbances repeatedly establish strongly hail-favorable thermodynamic and dynamical conditions that push the atmosphere beyond the convective threshold. The close similarity between hail day anomalies in climatological seasons and those in the most active seasons further indicates that hail-rich seasons are distinguished less by fundamentally different storm environments than by a higher recurrence of otherwise typical hail-favorable conditions. In contrast, south of the Alps, seasonal preconditioning is more limited and mainly expressed through persistent positive Mediterranean SST anomalies and enhanced convective inhibition, acting on an already near-threshold thermodynamic environment in which hail frequency is primarily controlled by recurrent synoptic and mesoscale triggering.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <label>7</label><title>Seasonal precursors of active hail seasons in northern and southern Switzerland</title>
      <p id="d2e1194">Lastly we aim to identify potential precursors of active hail seasons by analyzing atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface conditions prior to the most active and inactive hail seasons, including the preceding winter, spring, and the full year before the hail season. Several coherent and statistically significant anomalies emerge, suggesting large-scale preconditioning mechanisms that may influence hail activity in the subsequent summer. The most relevant signals are discussed below.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e1199">Mean surface temperature anomalies over October to March preceding the ten most active hail seasons in northern and southern Switzerland. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show anomalies prior to the most active hail seasons for the northern and southern regions. Stippling indicates statistical significance at the 95 % confidence level.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1214">The preceding winters exhibit distinct 2 m temperature (t2m) anomalies for both study areas (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>). For active seasons in the northern study area, cooler-than-average surface temperatures occur over Central Europe and Scandinavia, whereas for the southern study area the cold anomalies extend across western Russia and Kazakhstan and are stronger and more spatially extensive. These patterns coincide with increased snow cover over the respective regions (see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA3"/>). Both regions also show the same temperature signatures over North America, with cold anomalies over northeastern North America and warm anomalies over Alaska and Canada, although the signal is more pronounced and significant for the southern region. These temperature patterns again correspond to positive snow-cover anomalies over colder northeastern North America, and negative anomalies over warmer Alaska (see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA3"/>). Alpine snow cover is near normal for the northern area and slightly reduced for the southern area (not significant). The patterns for inactive seasons exhibit mostly opposite signs (see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1226">In the Pacific sector, SST anomalies during active hail seasons show a colder-than-average eastern and central Pacific and a warmer-than-average Gulf of Alaska, mirroring the surface-temperature anomalies in the Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>). This pattern closely resembles the positive phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.65"><named-content content-type="pre">PDO,</named-content></xref>). In inactive seasons the western Pacific SST anomalies show opposites signs to those in active hail seasons (see Appendix Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA5"/>). The positive SST and 2 m temperature anomalies in the Gulf of Alaska coincide with increased recurrence of the mid-level (500 hPa) large-scale flow during January to April preceding the most active hail seasons for both regions, although the signal is significant only during April (the beginning of the hail season) in the south (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). In summary, strong hail seasons in Switzerland are preceded by winters with enhanced Eurasian snow cover, widespread continental cooling, and Pacific SST anomalies resembling a positive PDO pattern.</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e1242">As Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>, but for sea surface temperature.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8">
  <label>8</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e1261">This study provides the first long-term, regionally resolved assessment of interannual hail variability in Switzerland, linking seasonal hail day frequency to atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface anomalies across multiple spatial and temporal scales.Our results indicate that hail-active seasons are associated with the repeated occurrence of favorable large-scale circulation patterns embedded within, or actively establishing, thermodynamically favorable environments. The predominant seasonal-mean circulation, as well as the sign and magnitude of the associated thermodynamic and stability anomalies, differ between the two study regions. Corresponding analyses of the ten least active hail seasons (the Supplement) reveal largely opposite anomaly patterns, supporting the robustness of the identified relationships and indicating that hail-active and hail-inactive seasons are characterized by distinct large-scale environments.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S8.SS1">
  <label>8.1</label><title>Teleconnections and large-scale climate modes</title>
      <p id="d2e1271">Our results position annual hail variability within the broader context of large-scale teleconnection patterns that modulate atmospheric circulation over the North Atlantic-European sector. Previous studies have identified a complex and regionally dependent relationship between the NAO and convective storm activity. While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.66"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.67"/> reported reduced observed thunderstorm activity during positive NAO phases over western and central Europe, they also found that positive NAO phases are associated with more thunderstorm-favorable thermodynamic environments. In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.68"/> reported increased thunderstorm activity during positive NAO phases over parts of western Europe and attributed the apparent discrepancy with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.69"/> primarily to seasonal effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e1286">Our Z500 anomaly patterns associated with active hail seasons in northern Switzerland project more strongly onto a positive NAO-like structure. However, additional correlation analyses reveal only weak relationships with the NAO, with opposing signs depending on study region and time scale (Appendix Figs. <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/>). This weak NAO signal is consistent with previous work showing that the NAO exerts competing dynamical and thermodynamical influences on convection. Negative NAO phases are associated with large-scale ascent through more frequent shortwave troughs but are often associated with reduced low-level moisture availability, whereas positive NAO phases suppress large-scale lifting while enhancing moisture transport into Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.70"/>. These competing effects can offset one another, leading to weak or regionally varying relationships between the NAO and convective activity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1296">In contrast, EA and SCAND patterns consistently exhibit the strongest correlations with hail frequency across all temporal aggregations (monthly, seasonal, annual, and various lead periods), with generally higher correlations south of the Alps. North of the Alps, the strongest correlations are positive for both EA and SCAND, in agreement with previous findings that positive phases of these modes enhance convection-favorable conditions across Europe by modifying meridional temperature gradients and steering large-scale flow anomalies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.71"/>. South of the Alps, the dominant circulation pattern, characterized by a deep trough over the British Isles and a ridge over the Mediterranean, resembles the  positive EA phase or the negative SCAND phase, for which the highest correlations are found. The latter contrasts with parts of the existing literature and highlights that the same mode of variability can exert different, and even opposite, influences depending on region. Weaker correlations with the EAWR and WP patterns further suggest that hail variability is influenced by a combination of teleconnections rather than a single dominant mode such as the NAO.</p>
      <p id="d2e1303">Notably, winters preceding active hail seasons in both regions are characterized by Pacific SST anomalies resembling a positive phase of the PDO. This may either point to a simple co-ocurrence or to a potential role of low-frequency Pacific variability in modulating the North Atlantic–European circulation through large-scale teleconnection pathways, thereby preconditioning the atmosphere for enhanced hail activity in the subsequent summer. While a direct causal link between Swiss summer hail activity and preceding winter anomalies in Pacific SSTs (or related land-surface signals such as Eurasian snow cover or continental surface temperatures) cannot be firmly established, these precursor signals nonetheless suggest potential for seasonal predictability. Because SST anomalies evolve slowly, their state several months in advance can be predicted with greater skill than synoptic-scale atmospheric conditions or local moisture fields. Moreover, the fact that most regions display opposite anomaly patterns during inactive hail seasons compared to active ones (not shown) further supports potential predictive value of these precursor signals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8.SS2">
  <label>8.2</label><title>Role of surface boundary conditions</title>
      <p id="d2e1314">Surface boundary conditions modulate the thermodynamic environment in which hail-producing convection develops and can therefore influence both the frequency and intensity of convective storms. Mediterranean SST anomalies emerge as a coherent and persistent feature of hail-active seasons in both northern and southern Switzerland. The Mediterranean has been identified as an important moisture source for Switzerland <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and positive SST anomalies can enhance moisture availability through increased surface latent heat fluxes and by raising the moist static energy of continental air masses, even in the absence of direct advection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.73"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1325">The importance of the Mediterranean as moisture source differs between the two regions. South of the Alps, positive SST anomalies coincide with enhanced latent heat fluxes and southerly low-level flow, suggesting a more direct moisture contribution to hail-favorable environments. North of the Alps, by contrast, lower-tropospheric moisture anomalies over the Mediterranean are weaker, and enhanced moisture availability appears to be driven more by continental processes, such as increased evapotranspiration from wetter-than-average soils in areas adjacent to northern Switzerland (e.g., along the Atlantic coast), or by moisture transported from the Atlantic associated with the incoming trough.</p>
      <p id="d2e1328">Land–atmosphere coupling may further modulate these environments. Soil moisture anomalies exhibit memory on subseasonal to seasonal timescales and can influence near-surface temperatures through changes in evapotranspiration and sensible heating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.74"/>. In addition, spatial soil-moisture gradients can support convective initiation by inducing mesoscale circulations that enhance low-level convergence and lift <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.75"/>, potentially acting in combination with synoptic-scale forcing and orographic effects. In the midlatitudes, these gradients rarely trigger convection on their own but can enhance existing convective potential, whereas in the subtropics, climatological soil-moisture gradients can actively initiate convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.76"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1340">Despite the presence of statistically significant SST and soil-moisture anomalies during hail-active seasons, it remains difficult to unambiguously determine whether these surface boundary conditions act primarily as drivers of enhanced hail activity or whether they arise as a response to the prevailing large-scale circulation. Resolving this causality would require targeted numerical sensitivity experiments that explicitly isolate the role of surface boundary conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8.SS3">
  <label>8.3</label><title>Role of elevated mixed layers and the British Isles trough for southern Switzerland</title>
      <p id="d2e1351">South of the Alps, composites during hail-active periods are consistent with the recurrent presence of an elevated dry layer. The co-occurrence of warm, relatively dry air aloft and moist near-surface conditions, together with positive CAPE and enhanced CIN anomalies, indicates a capped environment in which convective initiation is temporarily suppressed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>). Such an elevated mixed layer (EML) can delay convection, allowing instability to accumulate and favoring more intense convective development once the cap is eroded by synoptic-scale ascent or orographic lifting. This configuration is dynamically consistent with the prevailing large-scale flow during active hail seasons south of the Alps, characterized by a trough over the British Isles, a ridge over southern Europe, and southwesterly flow advecting warm, relatively dry air toward the Alpine region. Similar environments have been documented for severe and giant-hail events in the Po Valley <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.77"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1359">Although the upper-level trough is centered north of the Alps, its downstream influence can affect convective development even south of the Alpine crest. Ahead of the trough, quasi-geostrophic ascent associated with positive differential vorticity and temperature advection promotes large-scale lifting and supports frontogenesis. In Switzerland, up to 45 % of hail events south of the Alps occur in pre-frontal environments, most commonly associated with cold fronts approaching from the northwest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.78"/>. The interaction between synoptic-scale forcing and Alpine orography can enhance low-level moisture convergence, orographic lifting, vertical frontal circulations, and deep-layer wind shear <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.79"/>. Thus, even when the trough axis remains north of the Alps, its associated frontal structures and dynamical forcing can play a key role in triggering and organizing severe hail-producing convection in southern Switzerland.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8.SS4">
  <label>8.4</label><title>Synthesis</title>
      <p id="d2e1377">The strong co-occurrence of significant atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface anomalies across the same spatial and temporal scales highlights the multifaceted nature of hail season variability. No single factor, such as warm Mediterranean SSTs or local soil-moisture deficits, alone determines whether a season becomes hail-active; rather, it is the combined configuration of these elements that creates a conducive environment. This coupling helps explain why five of the ten most active hail seasons north of the Alps coincide with those south of the Alps: certain large-scale features, including anomalously warm Mediterranean SSTs, Central European ridging, and enhanced southerly moisture transport, simultaneously promote convective activity on both sides of the Alpine divide. At the same time, this overlap should be considered when interpreting the regional differences. Since half of the most active seasons are common to both regions, the contrasts identified between the northern and southern composites primarily arise from the remaining five region-specific seasons, which exhibit the strongest regional differences in the atmospheric anomaly patterns. They therefore highlight the atmospheric conditions that distinguish uniquely active seasons in each region, rather than representing entirely distinct circulation regimes.</p>
      <p id="d2e1380">Despite this overlap, the coherent differences identified in the circulation, thermodynamic, and surface-boundary anomalies indicate that Swiss hail variability is shaped by the interplay of region-specific, recurrent synoptic forcing, thermodynamic preconditioning, and slowly evolving boundary conditions. Multiple teleconnection patterns, particularly the EA and SCAND phases, show strong correlations with hail activity in both regions, while Pacific SST anomalies may provide valuable seasonal precursor signals. Taken together, these findings underscore the potential to improve (sub-)seasonal hail prediction by combining large-scale climate modes with regional circulation and land-atmosphere indicators operating across multiple spatial and temporal scales.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S9" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>9</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e1392">This study used a 64-year reconstruction of hail day occurrences (1959–2022) together with ERA5 data to diagnose the atmospheric, oceanic, and land-surface settings associated with hail-active seasons in Switzerland.</p>
      <p id="d2e1395">North of the Alps active hail seasons are characterized by a pronounced, zonally oriented positive–negative–positive Z500 anomaly pattern spanning the Atlantic and Central Europe. This circulation is associated with amplified meridional flow over the study area, a northward-displaced Atlantic jet, and a weakened subtropical jet over the Mediterranean. The resulting recurrent upstream flow regime repeatedly generates troughs over western Europe, providing persistent large-scale dynamical forcing throughout the hail season. These circulation patterns coincide with favorable local thermodynamic conditions, including positive temperature and specific humidity anomalies over northern Switzerland and anomalously warm Mediterranean SSTs. Together, these factors promote warm, moist, but relatively unsaturated boundary layers and a favorable vertical thermodynamic structure characterized by enhanced CAPE and moderate CIN. Moisture is supplied primarily through enhanced evaporation over adjacent continental regions with wetter-than-average soils or to Atlantic influences. The combined dynamical and thermodynamic conditions create an environment conducive to repeated hailstorm development in northern Switzerland. Among the analyzed variables, temperature exhibits the largest standardized anomalies, suggesting that it is the primary limiting factor for hail activity in this region.</p>
      <p id="d2e1398">South of the Alps, active hail seasons are linked to a large-scale dipole circulation characterized by enhanced blocking over Greenland, below-average geopotential heights over the British Isles, and anomalously high pressure across southern Europe and the Mediterranean. This pattern favors persistent southwesterly flow across Central Europe and is accompanied by pronounced horizontal gradients in temperature and soil moisture. Near the surface, the Mediterranean is anomalously moist, whereas adjacent continental regions are comparatively dry. In addition, the lower troposphere over the western Mediterranean features recurrent elevated dry layers, likely advected from the Iberian Peninsula, which contributes to moderately enhanced CIN over both the Mediterranean and the southern study region. Downstream of the Greenland block, recurrent Rossby wave breaking favors repeated trough formation north of the Alps, potentially influencing convective initiation and storm organization south of the Alpine crest through quasi-geostrophic forcing and pre-frontal environments. Compared with northern Switzerland, standardized anomalies in temperature, humidity, and CAPE are substantially weaker, indicating that the southern region is generally more conducive to convection even under relatively modest seasonal anomalies. Nevertheless, positive Mediterranean SST anomalies may enhance moisture transport toward southern Switzerland, thereby further supporting hail activity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1401">In both regions, active hail seasons are preceded in the winter before by enhanced Eurasian snow cover, continental cooling, and Pacific SST anomalies resembling a positive PDO phase. Although such precursors may represent co-occurrence rather than causation, they can still be valuable predictors for seasonal forecasting. The presence of strong and spatially coherent anomaly patterns implies predictive potential, supported by the fact that the anomalies associated with the most active hail seasons mostly exhibit opposite signs to those of the least active seasons. The corresponding analysis of hail-inactive seasons (not discussed but additional figures shown in Appendix A) yielded climatologically plausible and physically consistent signals, supporting the robustness of the patterns identified for hail-active seasons.</p>
      <p id="d2e1406">Many of the large-scale and surface variables identified here, such as Z500, SST, surface temperature, soil and boundary layer moisture show consistent, physically interpretable relationships with hail activity both north and south of the Alps. Some of these signals are shared between regions (e.g., warm Mediterranean SSTs and Central European ridging), while others are region-specific or emerge at different lead times, e.g. during or preceding the hail season. This diversity of temporally and spatially structured signals suggests that a combination of predictors could yield skillful (sub-)seasonal forecasts of hail activity. Future work should focus on exploiting these relationships through the development of data-driven prediction frameworks such as machine learning or hybrid physically based statistical models trained on the precursors and seasonal patterns identified in this study. We also recommend conducting similarly detailed analyses of seasonal hail variability in other regions. Extending this approach beyond Switzerland would help determine which of the mechanisms identified here are regionally specific and which represent more universal drivers of hail variability across Central Europe, complementing the short-timescale framework proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.80"/>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Additional figures and tables</title>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e1428">Correlations between various modes of climate variability and the hail day time series for northern Switzerland. Correlations are computed across multiple temporal scales, including the hail season (April–September), individual seasons (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON), annual, and monthly periods, as well as for preceding intervals (the previous cold season and the previous year's SON). The final column (“Sum”) represents the total correlation across all periods for each index, indicating which mode of variability accounts for the largest portion of natural variability in hail day frequency. The bottom row (“Sum”) shows which temporal period exhibits the strongest overall relationship with the variability indices.</p></caption>
  <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-t02.png"/>
</table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TA2"><label>Table A2</label><caption><p id="d2e1440">Same as Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/>, but for southern Switzerland.</p></caption>
  <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-t03.png"/>
</table-wrap>

      <fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e1453">Mean anomalies of PV during the ten most active hail seasons in northern (left) and southern (right) Switzerland. Stippling indicates areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The green box marks the respective study region.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FA2"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d2e1467">Mean anomalies of sea ice cover during the ten most active hail seasons in northern (left) and southern (right) Switzerland. Stippling indicates areas statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The green box marks the respective study region.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="FA3"><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d2e1480">Mean snow cover anomalies over October to March preceding the ten most active and least active hail seasons in northern and southern Switzerland. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show anomalies prior to the most active hail seasons for the northern and southern regions, and panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show anomalies prior to the weakest hail seasons for the northern and southern regions respectively. Stippling indicates statistical significance at the 95 % confidence level.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FA4"><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d2e1507">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA3"/>, but for 2 m temperature.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="FA5"><label>Figure A5</label><caption><p id="d2e1522">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA3"/>, but for sea surface temperature.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f17.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FA6"><label>Figure A6</label><caption><p id="d2e1538">Monthly hail days for the 10 most active hail seasons in <bold>(a)</bold> northern and <bold>(b)</bold> southern Switzerland. Blue bars show the number of hail days per month for each of these years. The magenta line indicates the mean monthly hail days within each year, while the yellow dashed line represents the long-term monthly mean across all years. This comparison highlights how the most active hail seasons exceed the climatological average and illustrates the variability of monthly hail activity among these peak seasons in both regions.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1681/2026/wcd-7-1681-2026-f18.png"/>

      </fig>

<table-wrap id="TA3"><label>Table A3</label><caption><p id="d2e1559">Overview of ERA5 predictors used in this study. All variables are provided on a 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° grid for 1959–2022; anomalies are computed with an 8-year 30 d moving window.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abbrev.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Levels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Unit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Time step</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blocking frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">blocking</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">from vertically averaged PV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">daily</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Convective available potential energy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">cape</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">J kg<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Convective inhibition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">cin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">J kg<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dewpoint temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">d2m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Evaporation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">e</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m w.e.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Freezing level height</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">deg0l</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geopotential height</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">z850/500/300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">850, 500, 300 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean sea-level pressure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">msl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Potential vorticity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PV335</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">335 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PVU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PV cutoffs frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">cutoff</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">stratospheric cyclonic cutoffs on 330–350 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">daily from 6 h timesteps</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PV streamer frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">streamer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">stratospheric cyclonic streamers on 330–350 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">daily from 6 h timesteps</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">R metric</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">recurrence of v500 on 35–65° N/40–70° N</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative humidity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">rh2m/850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 m, 850 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative vorticity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">vor500/300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">500, 300 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rossby wave breaking frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CWB, AWB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cyclonic/anticyclonic breaking on 330–350 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">frequency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">daily from 6hr timesteps</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sea-ice concentration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">siconc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0–1 (fraction of cell covered)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sea-surface temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sst</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Skin reservoir content</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">src</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m w.e.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Skin temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">skt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Snow cover</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">snowc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0 %–100 % (fraction of cell covered)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil temperature layers 1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">STL1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Layers 1–4: 0–7, 7–28, 28–100, 100–289 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Specific humidity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">q2m/850/500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 m, 850, 500 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">g kg<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface latent heat flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">slhf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">W m<sup>−2</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface pressure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface sensible heat flux</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sshf</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">W m<sup>−2</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">t2m/850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 m, 850 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">u100/850/500/300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100 m, 850, 500, 300 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind component</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">v100/850/500/300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100 m, 850, 500, 300 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vertical velocity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">w500</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">500 hPa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Pa s<sup>−1</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Volumetric soil water layers 1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SWVL1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Layers 1–4: 0–7, 7–28, 28–100, 100–289 cm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12:00 UTC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2303">The reconstructed hail day time series can be found on Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17353698</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.81"/>. ERA5 data are accessible via the CDS data server: <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets</uri> (last access: 2 September 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e2315">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1681-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1681-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e2324">LW: Conceptualization, data curation, methodology, visualization, writing (original draft, review and editing). OM: Supervision, conceptualization, methodology, writing (review and editing). MF, KS; CS: Discussions and writing (review and editing).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e2330">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e2336">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e2342">The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. We also acknowledge the use of Grammarly and ChatGPT for language editing.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e2347">This research has been supported by the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant no. CRSII5201792).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e2353">This paper was edited by Johannes Dahl and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Allen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Allen, J. T., Tippett, M. K., and Sobel, A. H.: Influence of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation on tornado and hail frequency in the United States, Nat. Geosci., 8, 278–283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2385</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Allen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Allen, J. T., Molina, M. J., and Gensini, V. A.: Modulation of Annual Cycle  of Tornadoes by El Niño–Southern Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5708–5717, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077482" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL077482</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Allen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Allen, J. T., Giammanco, I. M., Kumjian, M. R., Jurgen Punge, H., Zhang, Q.,  Groenemeijer, P., Kunz, M., and Ortega, K.: Understanding Hail in the Earth System, Rev. Geophys., 58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019RG000665</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Augenstein(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Augenstein, M.: Variabilität, Trends und serielles Clustering schwerer  Gewitterereignisse im Bezug zu großräumigen atmosphärischen Bedingungen, KITopen, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000179408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5445/IR/1000179408</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Augenstein et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Augenstein, M., Mohr, S., and Kunz, M.: Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on annual spatio-temporal lightning clusters in western and central Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4921–4939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4921-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-25-4921-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Baggett et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Baggett, C. F., Nardi, K. M., Childs, S. J., Zito, S. N., Barnes, E. A., and  Maloney, E. D.: Skillful Subseasonal Forecasts of Weekly Tornado and Hail Activity Using the Madden–Julian Oscillation, J.  Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029059</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Barnston and Livezey(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E.: Classification, Seasonality and Persistence of Low-Frequency Atmospheric Circulation Patterns, Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 1083–1126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115&lt;1083:csapol&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115&lt;1083:csapol&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Barras et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Barras, H., Martius, O., Nisi, L., Schroeer, K., Hering, A., and Germann, U.: Multi-day hail clusters and isolated hail days in Switzerland – large-scale flow conditions and precursors, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1167–1185, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1167-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-2-1167-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Barrett and Gensini(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Barrett, B. S. and Gensini, V. A.: Variability of central United States April–May tornado day likelihood by phase of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2790–2795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50522</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Barton et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Barton, E. J., Klein, C., Taylor, C. M., Marsham, J., Parker, D. J., Maybee,  B., Feng, Z., and Leung, L. R.: Soil moisture gradients strengthen mesoscale  convective systems by increasing wind shear, Nat. Geosci., 18, 330–336,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01666-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-025-01666-8</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Boettcher et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Boettcher, M., Röthlisberger, M., Attinger, R., Rieder, J., and Wernli, H.: The ERA5 Extreme Seasons Explorer as a Basis for Research at the Weather and Climate Interface, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E631–E644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0348.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0348.1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Brennan et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Brennan, K. P., Thurnherr, I., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: Insights from hailstorm track analysis in European climate change simulations, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3693–3712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3693-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-25-3693-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Byrne and O'Gorman(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Byrne, M. P. and O'Gorman, P. A.: Trends in continental temperature and  humidity directly linked to ocean warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4863–4868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722312115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1722312115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cacciamani et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Cacciamani, C., Battaglia, F., Patruno, P., Pomi, L., Selvini, A., and Tibaldi, S.: A climatological study of thunderstorm activity in the Po Valley, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 50, 185–203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00866116</ext-link>,  1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cheng et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, K., Harris, L., Bretherton, C., Merlis, T. M., Bolot, M., Zhou, L.,  Kaltenbaugh, A., Clark, S., and Fueglistaler, S.: Impact of Warmer Sea  Surface Temperature on the Global Pattern of Intense Convection: Insights From a Global Storm Resolving Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099796" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL099796</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Cook et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Cook, A. R., Leslie, L. M., Parsons, D. B., and Schaefer, J. T.: The Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on Winter and Early Spring U.S. Tornado Outbreak, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2455–2478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-16-0249.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jamc-d-16-0249.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>De Martin et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>De Martin, F., Manzato, A., Carlon, N., Setvák, M., and Miglietta, M. M.:  Dynamic and statistical analysis of giant hail environments in northeast Italy, Q. J. Roy. Meteor., 151, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4945" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4945</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Doswell(1987)</label><mixed-citation>Doswell III, C. A.: The Distinction between Large-Scale and Mesoscale Contribution to Severe Convection: A Case Study Example, Weather Forecast., 2, 3–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1987)002&lt;0003:TDBLSA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1987)002&lt;0003:TDBLSA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Doswell and Bosart(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Doswell III, C. A. and Bosart, L. F.: Extratropical Synoptic-Scale Processes and Severe Convection, Meteor. Mon., 50, 27–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.27" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.27</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dowdy(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dowdy, A. J.: Seasonal forecasting of lightning and thunderstorm activity in  tropical and temperate regions of the world, Scientific Reports, 6, 20874,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep20874</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Emanuel(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Emanuel, K.: On the Physics of High CAPE, J. Atmos. Sci., 80, 2669–2683, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0060.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-23-0060.1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Feldmann et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Feldmann, M., Rotunno, R., Germann, U., and Berne, A.: Supercell Thunderstorms in Complex Topography – How Mountain Valleys with Lakes Can Increase Occurrence Frequency, Mon. Weather Rev., 152, 471–489,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0350.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-22-0350.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Feldmann et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Feldmann, M., Domeisen, D. I. V., and Martius, O.: A pan-European analysis of large-scale drivers of severe convective outbreaks, Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 1089–1106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-1089-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-6-1089-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Fluck et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Fluck, E., Kunz, M., Geissbuehler, P., and Ritz, S. P.: Radar-based assessment of hail frequency in Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 683–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-683-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-21-683-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Francis and Vavrus(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to  extreme weather in mid‐latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012gl051000</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Gallagher Re(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Gallagher Re: Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report: 2023. Data, Insights, and Perspective, Executive Summary, <uri>https://www.ajg.com/gallagherre/-/media/files/gallagher/gallagherre/news-and-insights/2024/january/natural-catastrophe-and-climate-report-2023.pdf</uri> (last access: 2 September 2026),  2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Gensini and Allen(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Gensini, V. A. and Allen, J. T.: U.S. Hail Frequency and the Global Wind Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1611–1620,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076822" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076822</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Gensini and Marinaro(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Gensini, V. A. and Marinaro, A.: Tornado Frequency in the United States Related to Global Relative Angular Momentum, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 801–810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0289.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-15-0289.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Giaiotti et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Giaiotti, D., Nordio, S., and Stel, F.: The climatology of hail in the plain of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Atmos. Res., 67–68, 247–259,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00084-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00084-X</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Gladich et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Gladich, I., Gallai, I., Giaiotti, D., and Stel, F.: On the diurnal cycle of  deep moist convection in the southern side of the Alps analysed through  cloud-to-ground lightning activity, Atmos. Res., 100, 371–376,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.026</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Grams et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Grams, C. M., Magnusson, L., and Madonna, E.: An atmospheric dynamics  perspective on the amplification and propagation of forecast error in  numerical weather prediction models: A case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,  144, 2577–2591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3353</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Hermann et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Hermann, M., Wernli, H., and Röthlisberger, M.: Drastic increase in the  magnitude of very rare summer-mean vapor pressure deficit extremes, Nat. Commun., 15, 7022, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51305-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-51305-w</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,  Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,  A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,  Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., De Rosnay, P.,  Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global  reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kaderli(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Kaderli, S.: skaderli/WaveBreaking: WaveBreaking v0.3.8, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14214463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.14214463</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kretschmer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F., and Runge, J.: Using Causal Effect Networks to Analyze Different Arctic Drivers of Midlatitude Winter Circulation, J. Climate, 29, 4069–4081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-15-0654.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-15-0654.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kumjian et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Kumjian, M. R., Lombardo, K., and Loeffler, S.: The Evolution of Hail Production in Simulated Supercell Storms, J. Atmos. Sci., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0034.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-21-0034.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kunz et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Kunz, M., Wandel, J., Fluck, E., Baumstark, S., Mohr, S., and Schemm, S.: Ambient conditions prevailing during hail events in central Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1867–1887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1867-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-20-1867-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lee et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S.-K., Atlas, R., Enfield, D., Wang, C., and Liu, H.: Is There an Optimal ENSO Pattern That Enhances Large-Scale Atmospheric Processes Conducive to Tornado Outbreaks in the United States?, J. Climate, 26, 1626–1642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00128.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00128.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lin and Kumjian(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, Y. and Kumjian, M. R.: Influences of CAPE on Hail Production in Simulated Supercell Storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 179–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0054.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-21-0054.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Liu et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Xu, L., and Xiao, W.: The influence of soil  moisture on convective activity: a review, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 149, 221–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04046-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-022-04046-z</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Mantua et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Mantua, N. J., Hare, S. R., Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M., and Francis, R. C.: A  Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production,  B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1069–1079,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;1069:APICOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;1069:APICOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Manzato et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Manzato, A., Davolio, S., Miglietta, M. M., Pucillo, A., and Setvák, M.: 12 September 2012: A supercell outbreak in NE Italy?, Atmos. Res., 153, 98–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.019</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Manzato et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Manzato, A., Riva, V., Tiesi, A., and Marcello Miglietta, M.: Observational  analysis and simulations of a severe hailstorm in northeastern Italy, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 3587–3611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3886" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3886</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Markowski and Richardson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Markowski, P. and Richardson, Y.: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes, Wiley, 1 edn., ISBN 978-0-470-74213-6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470682104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470682104</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Martius et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Martius, O., Hering, A., Kunz, M., Manzato, A., Mohr, S., Nisi, L., and  Trefalt, S.: Challenges and Recent Advances in Hail Research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, ES51–ES54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0207.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0207.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Miller et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Miller, D. E., Gensini, V. A., and Barrett, B. S.: Madden-Julian oscillation  influences United States springtime tornado and hail frequency, npj Clim.  Atmos. Sci., 5, 37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00263-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-022-00263-5</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Mohr et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, S., Wandel, J., Lenggenhager, S., and Martius, O.: Relationship between  atmospheric blocking and warm‐season thunderstorms over western and central Europe, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 3040–3056, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3603</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Mohr et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, S., Wilhelm, J., Wandel, J., Kunz, M., Portmann, R., Punge, H. J., Schmidberger, M., Quinting, J. F., and Grams, C. M.: The role of large-scale dynamics in an exceptional sequence of severe thunderstorms in Europe May–June 2018, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 325–348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-325-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-1-325-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Mohr et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Mohr, S., Tonn, M., Augenstein, M., Sperka, C., Kavil Kambrath, G., and Kunz,  M.: A 20-year spatio-temporal analysis of 3D radar-based hail tracks in  Germany: trends and regional differences, Front. Environ. Sci., 14, 1736782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1736782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2026.1736782</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Molina et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Molina, M. J., Timmer, R. P., and Allen, J. T.: Importance of the Gulf of Mexico as a climate driver for U.S. severe thunderstorm activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071603</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Newman et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Newman, M., Alexander, M. A., Ault, T. R., Cobb, K. M., Deser, C., Di Lorenzo, E., Mantua, N. J., Miller, A. J., Minobe, S., Nakamura, H., Schneider, N., Vimont, D. J., Phillips, A. S., Scott, J. D., and Smith, C. A.: The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Revisited, J. Climate, 29, 4399–4427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Nisi et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Nisi, L., Martius, O., Hering, A., Kunz, M., and Germann, U.: Spatial and  temporal distribution of hailstorms in the Alpine region: a long‐term, high resolution, radar‐based analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Society, 142, 1590–1604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2771</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Nisi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Nisi, L., Hering, A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A 15-Year Hail Streak  Climatology for the Alpine Region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1429–1449,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3286" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3286</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Nisi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Nisi, L., Hering, A., Germann, U., Schroeer, K., Barras, H., Kunz, M., and  Martius, O.: Hailstorms in the Alpine region: Diurnal cycle,  characteristics, and the nowcasting potential of lightning properties, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 4170–4194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3897</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Pfleiderer et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Pfleiderer, P., Schleussner, C.-F., Kornhuber, K., and Coumou, D.: Summer  weather becomes more persistent in a 2 °C world, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 666–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0555-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-019-0555-0</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Piper and Kunz(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Piper, D. and Kunz, M.: Spatiotemporal variability of lightning activity in Europe and the relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation teleconnection pattern, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1319–1336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1319-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-17-1319-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Piper et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Piper, D. A., Kunz, M., Allen, J. T., and Mohr, S.: Investigation of the  temporal variability of thunderstorms in central and western Europe and the  relation to large‐scale flow and teleconnection patterns, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 3644–3666, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3647</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Punge and Kunz(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Punge, H. and Kunz, M.: Hail observations and hailstorm characteristics in  Europe: A review, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 159–184,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.012</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Richman(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Richman, M. B.: Rotation of principal components, J. Climatol., 6, 293–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370060305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3370060305</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Röthlisberger et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Röthlisberger, M., Frossard, L., Bosart, L. F., Keyser, D., and Martius, O.: Recurrent Synoptic-Scale Rossby Wave Patterns and Their Effect on the Persistence of Cold and Hot Spells, J. Climate, 32, 3207–3226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0664.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0664.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Röthlisberger et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Röthlisberger, M., Hermann, M., Frei, C., Lehner, F., Fischer, E. M., Knutti,  R., and Wernli, H.: A New Framework for Identifying and Investigating Seasonal Climate Extremes, J. Climate, 34, 7761–7782,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0953.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0953.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Schemm et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Schemm, S., Nisi, L., Martinov, A., Leuenberger, D., and Martius, O.: On the  link between cold fronts and hail in Switzerland, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 17, 315–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl.660</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Schmid et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, T., Gebhart, V., and Bresch, D. N.: Projected Changes in European Hail Damage Risk with 3 °C Global Warming Based on Km-Scale Regional Climate Model Simulations, SSRN [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5281477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2139/ssrn.5281477</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Schulte-Fischedick et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Schulte-Fischedick, A., Feldmann, M., Hering, A., Nisi, L., Schwierz, C., and  Schröer, K.: Observed hailstorm characteristics and emerging trends in the  western Alpine region: a 20-year storm-scale analysis, Front. Environ. Sci., 14, 1783155, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1783155" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fenvs.2026.1783155</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Schwierz et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Schwierz, C., Croci‐Maspoli, M., and Davies, H. C.: Perspicacious indicators  of atmospheric blocking, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019341" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL019341</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Seneviratne et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,  Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil  moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 99, 125–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Sodemann and Zubler(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Sodemann, H. and Zubler, E.: Seasonal and inter‐annual variability of the  moisture sources for Alpine precipitation during 1995–2002, Int. J.   Climatol., 30, 947–961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1932" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.1932</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Sprenger et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Sprenger, M., Fragkoulidis, G., Binder, H., Croci-Maspoli, M., Graf, P., Grams, C. M., Knippertz, P., Madonna, E., Schemm, S., Škerlak, B., and Wernli, H.: Global Climatologies of Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Features based on ERA-Interim, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1739–1748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Steinfeld(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Steinfeld, D.: steidani/ConTrack: ConTrack v0.3.0, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4765560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4765560</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Taylor et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, C. M., Gounou, A., Guichard, F., Harris, P. P., Ellis, R. J., Couvreux, F., and De Kauwe, M.: Frequency of Sahelian storm initiation enhanced over mesoscale soil-moisture patterns, Nat. Geosci., 4, 430–433,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1173" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1173</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Thompson and Roundy(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, D. B. and Roundy, P. E.: The Relationship between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and U.S. Violent Tornado Outbreaks in the Spring, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2087–2095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-12-00173.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/mwr-d-12-00173.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Thurnherr et al.(2025) </label><mixed-citation>Thurnherr, I., Cui, R., Velasquez, P., Wernli, H., and Schär, C.: The effect  of 3 °C global warming on hail over Europe, Authorea [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173809555.59545480/v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.22541/au.173809555.59545480/v1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Tippett(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Tippett, M. K.: Robustness of Relations between the MJO and U.S. Tornado Occurrence, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 3873–3884,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0207.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-18-0207.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Tippett et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Tippett, M. K., Allen, J. T., Gensini, V. A., and Brooks, H. E.: Climate and Hazardous Convective Weather, Current Climate Change Reports, 1, 60–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0006-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-015-0006-6</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Trapp and Hoogewind(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Trapp, R. J. and Hoogewind, K. A.: Exploring a possible connection between  U.S. tornado activity and Arctic sea ice, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0025-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0025-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Trefalt et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Trefalt, S., Martynov, A., Barras, H., Besic, N., Hering, A. M., Lenggenhager, S., Noti, P., Röthlisberger, M., Schemm, S., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A severe hail storm in complex topography in Switzerland – Observations and processes, Atmos. Res., 209, 76–94,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.03.007</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Tuel and Martius(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Tuel, A. and Martius, O.: Persistent warm and cold spells in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics: regionalisation, synoptic-scale dynamics and temperature budget, Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 263–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-263-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-5-263-2024</ext-link>, 2024. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Van Den Hurk et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Van Den Hurk, B., Doblas-Reyes, F., Balsamo, G., Koster, R. D., Seneviratne,  S. I., and Camargo, H.: Soil moisture effects on seasonal temperature and precipitation forecast scores in Europe, Clim. Dynam., 38, 349–362,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0956-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-010-0956-2</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wernli and Sprenger(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Wernli, H. and Sprenger, M.: Identification and ERA-15 Climatology of Potential Vorticity Streamers and Cutoffs near the Extratropical Tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1569–1586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3912.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Wilhelm(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Wilhelm, L.: Reconstructed hail days for northern and southern Switzerland from 1959 to 2022, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17353698</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Wilhelm et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Wilhelm, L., Schwierz, C., Schröer, K., Taszarek, M., and Martius, O.: Reconstructing hail days in Switzerland with statistical models (1959–2022), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3869–3894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3869-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-24-3869-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Towards understanding the interannual variability of hail in Switzerland</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Allen et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, J. T., Tippett, M. K., and Sobel, A. H.: Influence of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation on tornado and hail frequency in the United States, Nat. Geosci., 8, 278–283, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2385</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Allen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, J. T., Molina, M. J., and Gensini, V. A.: Modulation of Annual Cycle  of Tornadoes by El Niño–Southern Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5708–5717, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077482" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077482</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Allen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, J. T., Giammanco, I. M., Kumjian, M. R., Jurgen Punge, H., Zhang, Q.,  Groenemeijer, P., Kunz, M., and Ortega, K.: Understanding Hail in the Earth System, Rev. Geophys., 58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000665</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Augenstein(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Augenstein, M.: Variabilität, Trends und serielles Clustering schwerer  Gewitterereignisse im Bezug zu großräumigen atmosphärischen Bedingungen, KITopen, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000179408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000179408</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Augenstein et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Augenstein, M., Mohr, S., and Kunz, M.: Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on annual spatio-temporal lightning clusters in western and central Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4921–4939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4921-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4921-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Baggett et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baggett, C. F., Nardi, K. M., Childs, S. J., Zito, S. N., Barnes, E. A., and  Maloney, E. D.: Skillful Subseasonal Forecasts of Weekly Tornado and Hail Activity Using the Madden–Julian Oscillation, J.  Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029059</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Barnston and Livezey(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barnston, A. G. and Livezey, R. E.: Classification, Seasonality and Persistence of Low-Frequency Atmospheric Circulation Patterns, Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 1083–1126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115&lt;1083:csapol&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115&lt;1083:csapol&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Barras et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barras, H., Martius, O., Nisi, L., Schroeer, K., Hering, A., and Germann, U.: Multi-day hail clusters and isolated hail days in Switzerland – large-scale flow conditions and precursors, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1167–1185, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1167-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1167-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Barrett and Gensini(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barrett, B. S. and Gensini, V. A.: Variability of central United States April–May tornado day likelihood by phase of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2790–2795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50522</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Barton et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barton, E. J., Klein, C., Taylor, C. M., Marsham, J., Parker, D. J., Maybee,  B., Feng, Z., and Leung, L. R.: Soil moisture gradients strengthen mesoscale  convective systems by increasing wind shear, Nat. Geosci., 18, 330–336,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01666-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01666-8</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Boettcher et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boettcher, M., Röthlisberger, M., Attinger, R., Rieder, J., and Wernli, H.:
The ERA5 Extreme Seasons Explorer as a Basis for Research at the Weather and Climate Interface, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E631–E644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0348.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0348.1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Brennan et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brennan, K. P., Thurnherr, I., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: Insights from hailstorm track analysis in European climate change simulations, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3693–3712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3693-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3693-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Byrne and O'Gorman(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Byrne, M. P. and O'Gorman, P. A.: Trends in continental temperature and  humidity directly linked to ocean warming, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 4863–4868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722312115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722312115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cacciamani et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cacciamani, C., Battaglia, F., Patruno, P., Pomi, L., Selvini, A., and Tibaldi, S.: A climatological study of thunderstorm activity in the Po Valley, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 50, 185–203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00866116</a>,  1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cheng et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, K., Harris, L., Bretherton, C., Merlis, T. M., Bolot, M., Zhou, L.,  Kaltenbaugh, A., Clark, S., and Fueglistaler, S.: Impact of Warmer Sea  Surface Temperature on the Global Pattern of Intense Convection: Insights From a Global Storm Resolving Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099796</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Cook et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cook, A. R., Leslie, L. M., Parsons, D. B., and Schaefer, J. T.: The Impact of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on Winter and Early Spring U.S. Tornado Outbreak, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 56, 2455–2478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-16-0249.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-16-0249.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>De Martin et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Martin, F., Manzato, A., Carlon, N., Setvák, M., and Miglietta, M. M.:  Dynamic and statistical analysis of giant hail environments in northeast Italy, Q. J. Roy. Meteor., 151, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4945" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4945</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Doswell(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doswell III, C. A.: The Distinction between Large-Scale and Mesoscale Contribution to Severe Convection: A Case Study Example, Weather Forecast., 2, 3–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1987)002&lt;0003:TDBLSA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1987)002&lt;0003:TDBLSA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Doswell and Bosart(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doswell III, C. A. and Bosart, L. F.: Extratropical Synoptic-Scale Processes and Severe Convection, Meteor. Mon., 50, 27–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.27" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-28.50.27</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dowdy(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dowdy, A. J.: Seasonal forecasting of lightning and thunderstorm activity in  tropical and temperate regions of the world, Scientific Reports, 6, 20874,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20874</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Emanuel(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Emanuel, K.: On the Physics of High CAPE, J. Atmos. Sci., 80, 2669–2683, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0060.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0060.1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Feldmann et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feldmann, M., Rotunno, R., Germann, U., and Berne, A.: Supercell Thunderstorms in Complex Topography – How Mountain Valleys with Lakes Can Increase Occurrence Frequency, Mon. Weather Rev., 152, 471–489,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0350.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0350.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Feldmann et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feldmann, M., Domeisen, D. I. V., and Martius, O.: A pan-European analysis of large-scale drivers of severe convective outbreaks, Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 1089–1106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-1089-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-1089-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Fluck et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fluck, E., Kunz, M., Geissbuehler, P., and Ritz, S. P.: Radar-based assessment of hail frequency in Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 683–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-683-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-683-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Francis and Vavrus(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to  extreme weather in mid‐latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051000</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Gallagher Re(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gallagher Re: Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report: 2023. Data,
Insights, and Perspective, Executive Summary,
<a href="https://www.ajg.com/gallagherre/-/media/files/gallagher/gallagherre/news-and-insights/2024/january/natural-catastrophe-and-climate-report-2023.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 September 2026),  2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gensini and Allen(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gensini, V. A. and Allen, J. T.: U.S. Hail Frequency and the Global Wind Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1611–1620,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076822" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076822</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gensini and Marinaro(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gensini, V. A. and Marinaro, A.: Tornado Frequency in the United States Related to Global Relative Angular Momentum, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 801–810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0289.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0289.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Giaiotti et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giaiotti, D., Nordio, S., and Stel, F.: The climatology of hail in the plain of Friuli Venezia Giulia, Atmos. Res., 67–68, 247–259,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00084-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00084-X</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Gladich et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gladich, I., Gallai, I., Giaiotti, D., and Stel, F.: On the diurnal cycle of  deep moist convection in the southern side of the Alps analysed through  cloud-to-ground lightning activity, Atmos. Res., 100, 371–376,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.08.026</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Grams et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grams, C. M., Magnusson, L., and Madonna, E.: An atmospheric dynamics  perspective on the amplification and propagation of forecast error in  numerical weather prediction models: A case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,  144, 2577–2591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3353</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hermann et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hermann, M., Wernli, H., and Röthlisberger, M.: Drastic increase in the  magnitude of very rare summer-mean vapor pressure deficit extremes, Nat. Commun., 15, 7022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51305-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51305-w</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,  Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,  A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,  Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., De Rosnay, P.,  Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global  reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kaderli(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaderli, S.: skaderli/WaveBreaking: WaveBreaking v0.3.8,
Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14214463" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14214463</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kretschmer et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F., and Runge, J.: Using Causal Effect Networks to Analyze Different Arctic Drivers of Midlatitude Winter Circulation, J. Climate, 29, 4069–4081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-15-0654.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-15-0654.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kumjian et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumjian, M. R., Lombardo, K., and Loeffler, S.: The Evolution of Hail Production in Simulated Supercell Storms, J. Atmos. Sci., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0034.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0034.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kunz et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kunz, M., Wandel, J., Fluck, E., Baumstark, S., Mohr, S., and Schemm, S.: Ambient conditions prevailing during hail events in central Europe, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1867–1887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1867-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1867-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lee et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, S.-K., Atlas, R., Enfield, D., Wang, C., and Liu, H.: Is There an Optimal ENSO Pattern That Enhances Large-Scale Atmospheric Processes Conducive to Tornado Outbreaks in the United States?, J. Climate, 26, 1626–1642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00128.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00128.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lin and Kumjian(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, Y. and Kumjian, M. R.: Influences of CAPE on Hail Production in Simulated Supercell Storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 179–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0054.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0054.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Liu et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Li, C., Xu, L., and Xiao, W.: The influence of soil  moisture on convective activity: a review, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 149, 221–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04046-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04046-z</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mantua et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mantua, N. J., Hare, S. R., Zhang, Y., Wallace, J. M., and Francis, R. C.: A  Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production,  B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1069–1079,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;1069:APICOW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078&lt;1069:APICOW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Manzato et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manzato, A., Davolio, S., Miglietta, M. M., Pucillo, A., and Setvák, M.: 12 September 2012: A supercell outbreak in NE Italy?, Atmos. Res., 153, 98–118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.019</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Manzato et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Manzato, A., Riva, V., Tiesi, A., and Marcello Miglietta, M.: Observational  analysis and simulations of a severe hailstorm in northeastern Italy, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 3587–3611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3886" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3886</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Markowski and Richardson(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Markowski, P. and Richardson, Y.: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes, Wiley, 1 edn., ISBN 978-0-470-74213-6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470682104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470682104</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Martius et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martius, O., Hering, A., Kunz, M., Manzato, A., Mohr, S., Nisi, L., and  Trefalt, S.: Challenges and Recent Advances in Hail Research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, ES51–ES54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0207.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0207.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Miller et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miller, D. E., Gensini, V. A., and Barrett, B. S.: Madden-Julian oscillation  influences United States springtime tornado and hail frequency, npj Clim.  Atmos. Sci., 5, 37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00263-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00263-5</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Mohr et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mohr, S., Wandel, J., Lenggenhager, S., and Martius, O.: Relationship between  atmospheric blocking and warm‐season thunderstorms over western and central Europe, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 3040–3056, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3603</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mohr et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mohr, S., Wilhelm, J., Wandel, J., Kunz, M., Portmann, R., Punge, H. J., Schmidberger, M., Quinting, J. F., and Grams, C. M.: The role of large-scale dynamics in an exceptional sequence of severe thunderstorms in Europe May–June 2018, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 325–348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-325-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-325-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Mohr et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mohr, S., Tonn, M., Augenstein, M., Sperka, C., Kavil Kambrath, G., and Kunz,  M.: A 20-year spatio-temporal analysis of 3D radar-based hail tracks in  Germany: trends and regional differences, Front. Environ. Sci., 14, 1736782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1736782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1736782</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Molina et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Molina, M. J., Timmer, R. P., and Allen, J. T.: Importance of the Gulf of Mexico as a climate driver for U.S. severe thunderstorm activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071603</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Newman et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Newman, M., Alexander, M. A., Ault, T. R., Cobb, K. M., Deser, C., Di Lorenzo, E., Mantua, N. J., Miller, A. J., Minobe, S., Nakamura, H., Schneider, N., Vimont, D. J., Phillips, A. S., Scott, J. D., and Smith, C. A.: The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Revisited, J. Climate, 29, 4399–4427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0508.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Nisi et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisi, L., Martius, O., Hering, A., Kunz, M., and Germann, U.: Spatial and  temporal distribution of hailstorms in the Alpine region: a long‐term, high resolution, radar‐based analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Society, 142, 1590–1604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2771</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nisi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisi, L., Hering, A., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A 15-Year Hail Streak  Climatology for the Alpine Region, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1429–1449,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3286" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3286</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Nisi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisi, L., Hering, A., Germann, U., Schroeer, K., Barras, H., Kunz, M., and  Martius, O.: Hailstorms in the Alpine region: Diurnal cycle,  characteristics, and the nowcasting potential of lightning properties, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 4170–4194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3897</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Pfleiderer et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pfleiderer, P., Schleussner, C.-F., Kornhuber, K., and Coumou, D.: Summer  weather becomes more persistent in a 2&thinsp;°C world, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 666–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0555-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0555-0</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Piper and Kunz(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Piper, D. and Kunz, M.: Spatiotemporal variability of lightning activity in Europe and the relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation teleconnection pattern, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1319–1336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1319-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1319-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Piper et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Piper, D. A., Kunz, M., Allen, J. T., and Mohr, S.: Investigation of the  temporal variability of thunderstorms in central and western Europe and the  relation to large‐scale flow and teleconnection patterns, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 3644–3666, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3647</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Punge and Kunz(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Punge, H. and Kunz, M.: Hail observations and hailstorm characteristics in  Europe: A review, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 159–184,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.012</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Richman(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richman, M. B.: Rotation of principal components, J. Climatol., 6, 293–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370060305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370060305</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Röthlisberger et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Röthlisberger, M., Frossard, L., Bosart, L. F., Keyser, D., and Martius, O.: Recurrent Synoptic-Scale Rossby Wave Patterns and Their Effect on the Persistence of Cold and Hot Spells, J. Climate, 32, 3207–3226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0664.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0664.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Röthlisberger et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Röthlisberger, M., Hermann, M., Frei, C., Lehner, F., Fischer, E. M., Knutti,  R., and Wernli, H.: A New Framework for Identifying and Investigating Seasonal Climate Extremes, J. Climate, 34, 7761–7782,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0953.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0953.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Schemm et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schemm, S., Nisi, L., Martinov, A., Leuenberger, D., and Martius, O.: On the  link between cold fronts and hail in Switzerland, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 17, 315–325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.660</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Schmid et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmid, T., Gebhart, V., and Bresch, D. N.: Projected Changes in European Hail Damage Risk with 3&thinsp;°C Global Warming Based on Km-Scale Regional Climate Model Simulations, SSRN [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5281477" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5281477</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Schulte-Fischedick et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schulte-Fischedick, A., Feldmann, M., Hering, A., Nisi, L., Schwierz, C., and  Schröer, K.: Observed hailstorm characteristics and emerging trends in the  western Alpine region: a 20-year storm-scale analysis, Front. Environ. Sci., 14, 1783155, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1783155" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1783155</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Schwierz et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwierz, C., Croci‐Maspoli, M., and Davies, H. C.: Perspicacious indicators  of atmospheric blocking, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019341" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019341</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Seneviratne et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,  Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil  moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 99, 125–161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Sodemann and Zubler(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sodemann, H. and Zubler, E.: Seasonal and inter‐annual variability of the  moisture sources for Alpine precipitation during 1995–2002, Int. J.   Climatol., 30, 947–961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1932" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1932</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Sprenger et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sprenger, M., Fragkoulidis, G., Binder, H., Croci-Maspoli, M., Graf, P., Grams, C. M., Knippertz, P., Madonna, E., Schemm, S., Škerlak, B., and Wernli, H.: Global Climatologies of Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Features based on ERA-Interim, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1739–1748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Steinfeld(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Steinfeld, D.: steidani/ConTrack: ConTrack v0.3.0, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4765560" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4765560</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Taylor et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, C. M., Gounou, A., Guichard, F., Harris, P. P., Ellis, R. J., Couvreux, F., and De Kauwe, M.: Frequency of Sahelian storm initiation enhanced over mesoscale soil-moisture patterns, Nat. Geosci., 4, 430–433,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1173" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1173</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Thompson and Roundy(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, D. B. and Roundy, P. E.: The Relationship between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and U.S. Violent Tornado Outbreaks in the Spring, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2087–2095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-12-00173.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-12-00173.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Thurnherr et al.(2025) </label><mixed-citation>
      
Thurnherr, I., Cui, R., Velasquez, P., Wernli, H., and Schär, C.: The effect  of 3&thinsp;°C global warming on hail over Europe, Authorea [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173809555.59545480/v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173809555.59545480/v1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Tippett(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tippett, M. K.: Robustness of Relations between the MJO and U.S. Tornado Occurrence, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 3873–3884,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0207.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0207.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Tippett et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tippett, M. K., Allen, J. T., Gensini, V. A., and Brooks, H. E.: Climate and Hazardous Convective Weather, Current Climate Change Reports, 1, 60–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0006-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0006-6</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Trapp and Hoogewind(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trapp, R. J. and Hoogewind, K. A.: Exploring a possible connection between  U.S. tornado activity and Arctic sea ice, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0025-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0025-9</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Trefalt et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trefalt, S., Martynov, A., Barras, H., Besic, N., Hering, A. M., Lenggenhager, S., Noti, P., Röthlisberger, M., Schemm, S., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A severe hail storm in complex topography in Switzerland – Observations and processes, Atmos. Res., 209, 76–94,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.03.007</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Tuel and Martius(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tuel, A. and Martius, O.: Persistent warm and cold spells in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics: regionalisation, synoptic-scale dynamics and temperature budget, Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 263–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-263-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-263-2024</a>, 2024.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Van Den Hurk et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Den Hurk, B., Doblas-Reyes, F., Balsamo, G., Koster, R. D., Seneviratne,  S. I., and Camargo, H.: Soil moisture effects on seasonal temperature and precipitation forecast scores in Europe, Clim. Dynam., 38, 349–362,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0956-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0956-2</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wernli and Sprenger(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wernli, H. and Sprenger, M.: Identification and ERA-15 Climatology of Potential Vorticity Streamers and Cutoffs near the Extratropical Tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1569–1586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wilhelm(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilhelm, L.: Reconstructed hail days for northern and southern Switzerland from 1959 to 2022, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353698" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17353698</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wilhelm et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilhelm, L., Schwierz, C., Schröer, K., Taszarek, M., and Martius, O.: Reconstructing hail days in Switzerland with statistical models (1959–2022), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3869–3894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3869-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3869-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
