<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">WCD</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Weather and Climate Dynamics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">WCD</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Weather Clim. Dynam.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2698-4016</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/wcd-7-2171-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>The moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum as a framework to define tropical weather systems</article-title><alt-title>Moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum to define tropical weather systems</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Respati</surname><given-names>Muhamad Reyhan</given-names></name>
          <email>reyhan.respati@monash.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-0604</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Martin S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-0885</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jakob</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>ARC Centre of Excellence for the Weather of the 21st Century, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Earth, Atmosphere, and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geophysics and Meteorology, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Muhamad Reyhan Respati (reyhan.respati@monash.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2171</fpage><lpage>2192</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Muhamad Reyhan Respati et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026.html">This article is available from https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e111">While mid-latitude weather is commonly described in terms of discrete “weather systems”, such as cyclones and fronts, an equivalent framework is less established in the tropics due to the wide range of relevant scales. Instead, tropical weather is often analysed either in Lagrangian terms, through the tracking of mesoscale convective systems, or via spectral decomposition into planetary-scale wave-like disturbances. Here, we use both spectral analysis and Lagrangian object tracking to develop a novel framework for analysing tropical weather systems. We apply recent theoretical advances to classify convectively coupled tropical motions into three types based on their zonal phase speed: moisture modes, inertio-gravity waves, and mixed systems. We show that, consistent with theory, the observed ratio of low-level temperature to moisture anomalies increases with the system’s phase speed, although moisture variations may not be negligible for inertio-gravity waves. Moisture modes and mixed systems show distinct dynamical structures near and off the equator, while inertio-gravity waves are less clearly differentiated. These characteristics are broadly consistent across the tropics, with some regional variations. We find that moisture modes account for up to 75 % of extreme rainfall events along climatological moist margins, whereas mixed systems dominate in the intertropical convergence zone. Our tropical weather systems framework offers a new way to link large-scale tropical dynamics with precipitation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e125">The mean climate state at any location is the aggregate effect of day-to-day variations. For rainfall, in particular, this long-term average is contributed by discrete weather systems. In the mid- to high-latitude regions, there exists a consensus among the research community and the operational meteorological agencies of what constitutes a synoptic-scale weather system. They include surface features, such as fronts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.1"/> and cyclones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.2"/>, and some mid- to upper-tropospheric flow objects, like potential vorticity (PV) cutoffs and streamers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.3"/> and warm conveyor belts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">WCBs;</named-content></xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">see also</named-content></xref>. Meanwhile, besides tropical cyclones (TCs) and tropical lows or depressions, there is no consensus on how to define analogous rain-bearing tropical weather systems.</p>
      <p id="d2e147">A key challenge is the range of spatial scales on which one may define tropical weather systems. One approach is to focus on thunderstorms and the associated mesoscale convective systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">MCSs; see e.g.,</named-content></xref> using object tracking. Alternatively, a complementary view applies spectral analysis to decompose tropical motions into large-scale wave-like disturbances, such as the Madden–Julian oscillation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx72" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">MJO;</named-content></xref> and equatorial waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.8"/>. The MCS point of view examines weather from an object-based perspective and deals with tangible weather elements, like rainfall and clouds, but less with the underlying dynamics. For example, around a single TC, there are sometimes multiple clusters of MCS “objects”, even though they are most likely all under the dynamical influence of the TC. On the other hand, the equatorial wave perspective highlights the dynamics responsible for the rainfall, but views them from an Eulerian point of view. A case of twin cyclonic vortices symmetric about the equator, for example, may be seen through equatorial wave theory as part of the westward propagating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equatorial Rossby (ER) wave <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>, but the trajectories of the two cyclones may diverge, or one may outlive the other, and this cannot be fully explained by equatorial wave theory.</p>
      <p id="d2e180">The two examples above motivate the current study to explore a new approach of describing dynamical disturbances in the tropics that is more analogous to that used for the mid-latitudes. Conceptually, the approach is to fill the gap between the <italic>planetary-scale</italic> waves in the “background” and the <italic>smaller-scale</italic> MCSs with the <italic>synoptic-scale</italic> tropical weather systems. Here, we introduce an approach that combines the spectral and object tracking perspectives. Recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.10"/> used a scale analysis of the governing equations to identify seven distinct types of tropical motions. They applied a theoretical framework, developed by a number of authors over the past two decades (reviewed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>), in which disturbances are distinguished by the role played by moisture in their dynamics. The theory implies that slow-moving disturbances have the strongest coupling to moisture, and they are known as moisture modes. At the other end of the spectrum, disturbances that move rapidly behave like inertio-gravity waves. Motivated by this work, we separate convectively coupled dynamical systems other than TCs into three categories based on their phase speed: slow systems are described as <italic>moisture modes</italic>, fast systems as <italic>inertio-gravity (IG) waves</italic>, and those in between, which we call <italic>mixed systems</italic>. Using this framework, we aim to answer the following questions. <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e209">What is the observed relative importance of moisture and temperature perturbations in moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e213">What are the observed dynamic characteristics of moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e217">What are the rainfall characteristics associated with moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves?</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e220">The ability to decompose tropical weather into discrete systems has some useful and beneficial applications. For example, model forecasts of a particular type of weather system could be used in combination with the statistics of such weather systems to forecast the likelihood of an extreme event. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.11"/> showed that such a conditional forecasting method can lead to improved skill for rainfall extremes occurring over the Maritime continent. Another application would be to investigate the changes in tropical rainfall in a warming climate. As emphasised in previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, changes in tropical precipitation under global warming are not as simple as the Clausius-Clapeyron scaling of 7 % increase per 1 K of warming. The weather system framework could allow such changes to be separated into changes in frequency of different system types and changes in their respective contribution to rainfall, as has been done in the extratropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, helping to elucidate the key physical mechanisms at play.</p>
      <p id="d2e237">In the next section, we summarise the theoretical framework underlying our separation of tropical weather systems; the moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we explain our methodology of defining weather system types. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> presents the main characteristics of each type of tropical weather system. We explore how these systems affect the occurrences of extreme rainfall events by investigating the rainfall characteristics associated with each of them in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>. Lastly, we present the summary and discuss the results in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Moisture Mode-to-Gravity Wave Spectrum Theory</title>
      <p id="d2e256">Here we introduce the theoretical framework of tropical motions existing on a spectrum between fast inertio-gravity waves and slow moisture modes, each with contrasting propagation and maintenance mechanisms. We begin with the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.14"/> that sought to explain the complementary control of convective inhibition and lower-tropospheric moisture on convection. They developed an idealised atmospheric model with two distinct unstable modes. The first mode governs the precipitation by modulating the column saturation fraction (i.e., the ratio between column specific humidity and column saturation specific humidity), which they referred to as a moisture mode. The second mode controls convection by altering the convective inhibition just above the boundary layer, and this buoyancy-modulating system was identified as a convectively coupled gravity wave. While buoyancy itself is also affected by moisture anomalies, moisture modes are distinct in that they are present even under weak temperature gradient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="pre">WTG; e.g.,</named-content></xref> conditions, with no large-scale buoyancy anomalies. These two distinct modes were also found to move at different speeds, with the moisture mode propagating slower than the convectively coupled gravity wave.</p>
      <p id="d2e267">Moisture modes themselves were first described in a modelling study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.16"/>. By applying the WTG approximation and adding a prognostic moisture equation to their shallow water model of the tropics, they discovered a mode that owes its existence to horizontal moisture advection. This mode is related to the background horizontal moisture gradient in a manner similar to how the barotropic Rossby wave is related to the background potential vorticity gradient. Later studies suggest that some of the well-known forms of tropical intraseasonal variability, such as the MJO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, which does not appear in any dry atmosphere models, and the ER wave <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, whose observed propagation characteristics are slightly different from what the dry theory suggests, may be moisture modes. The main characteristic of a moisture mode is that it has strong moisture perturbations throughout the lower free troposphere, creating an environment that is supportive of deep convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.19"/>. Due to their slow propagation, moisture modes are also characterised by WTG balance, as their timescale is long enough to allow the temperature anomalies from latent heat release in deep convection to be smoothed out by gravity waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.20"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. This implies that the moisture perturbations associated with moisture modes are more important for their dynamics than the temperature or buoyancy perturbations.</p>
      <p id="d2e291">Compared to moisture modes, convectively coupled IG waves have been known far longer, as they appear in the solutions of the “dry” shallow water model of equatorial waves in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.21"/>. In the atmosphere, disturbances such as the syntoptic-scale 2 d waves appearing over the Western Pacific in Austral Summer have been identified as IG waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx61" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. With gravity acting as their main restoring force, IG waves induce significant density or buoyancy variations as they propagate, and these buoyancy anomalies reduce the static stability of the tropospheric column <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.23"/>. This can lower the convective inhibition above the boundary layer, making the environment more suitable for deep convection. In short, temperature or buoyancy variations are thought to dominate the coupling of IG waves to convection, while moisture variations are thought to dominate this coupling for moisture modes.</p>
      <p id="d2e305">The main distinction in the thermodynamics between moisture modes and IG waves can be summarised as a single parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.24"/>,

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M2" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is enthalpy, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is latent energy, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is specific humidity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is dry static energy (DSE; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is geopotential height, and the constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J kg<sup>−1</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J kg<sup>−1</sup> K<sup>−1</sup>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−2</sup> refer to latent heat of vaporisation, specific heat of dry air at constant pressure, and gravitational acceleration, respectively. The prime (<sup>′</sup>) denotes the magnitude of a perturbation associated with a given weather system. The approximation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≃</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is based on the assumption that the perturbation in DSE is dominated by that in enthalpy, rather than by that in geopotential. The approximate form of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) is more useful because the numerator and denominator now add up to the moist static energy (MSE; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) perturbation. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the relative size of moisture and temperature anomalies within a given disturbance. As such, we expect moisture modes to have a small value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because their moisture perturbations are large, while an IG wave would be expected to have a large value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because it has a large temperature perturbation, which is tightly related to its DSE perturbation.</p>
      <p id="d2e628"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.25"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.26"/> further find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a fundamental parameter governing the dynamics of the tropical atmosphere, and that it may be related to the phase speed of a propagating tropical weather system. Specifically, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.27"/> performed a comprehensive scaling of the governing equations to show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be written as

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Froude number, Bu is the Burger number, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio between vertical gradient of latent energy and vertical gradient of DSE, also known as the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.28"/> scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the phase speed of the system, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry gravity wave speed, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the meridional length scale of the system, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Rossby radius of deformation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the planetary vorticity. In the tropics, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is reasonably small, and for synoptic-scale systems, whose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km, Bu tends to be large. Therefore, here we assume that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which implies a direct relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the phase speed of a disturbance:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        In Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>, we sketch a derivation of a slightly different version of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.29"/>. The assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may breakdown, however, for systems occurring near the subtropical edge regions, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can no longer be considered small, or for systems with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The extent to which this approximation yields meaningful results is discussed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1075">Combined with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), the relation in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) tells us that systems with slow propagation will have a small value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and more dominant moisture perturbations, while fast-moving systems will have a large value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and more significant temperature perturbations, consistent with what was found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.30"/>. Moreover, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a continuous quantity, this means that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also continuous, and it implies that moisture modes and convectively coupled gravity waves are not a dichotomy of types of tropical weather system, but rather there exists a spectrum of types of system with moisture modes and IG waves at the opposing ends: a <italic>moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum</italic>. Another implication of this is that a system with a moderate propagating speed will have characteristics that are a mixture of those of a moisture mode and an IG wave: a <italic>mixed system</italic>. An illustration of this spectrum of systems is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1140">Wavenumber-frequency diagram of the space-time spectra of ISCCP outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> for data description) within 20° S–20° N overlaid with (black lines) some conventional spectral regions of the equatorial waves and the MJO and (coloured polygons) the separation of systems based on the framework described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>. The calculation of the space-time spectra follows that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.31"/>. Regions of moisture mode, mixed system, and IG wave are determined using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) as explained in more detail in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1160">As noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.32"/>, systems with similar thermodynamics (i.e., similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) can have different dynamical structures or balances. For example, a moisture mode can exist with a convergent-type low-level dynamics under semigeostrophic balance or with a rotational vortex-like structure under nonlinear balance. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.33"/> argued that convergent-type moisture modes are more likely near the equator, while rotational-type moisture modes are more likely off the equator. As with moisture modes, mixed systems may also be separated into equatorial convergent-type and off-equatorial rotational-type. Outside of this moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.34"/> identified two other special weather systems in the tropics (cf. Fig. 5 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="altparen.35"/>), tropical cyclones (TCs), which satisfy gradient wind balance, and moist quasi-geostrophic (QG) systems, which have phase speeds in the range of mixed systems, but have small Rossby numbers and satisfy QG balance, and are typically strongly extratropically influenced. For simplicity, in this paper we limit the scope to focus only on moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves, as well as some comparisons to TCs. We find it worth investigating how the separation of the convectively coupled large-scale motion signals in the tropics based on this framework, rather than on the traditional equatorial wave dispersion relations, can help us understand further the complex interactions between large-scale dynamics and moist convective processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d2e1201">As we are investigating the large-scale dynamical systems that are coupled with moist convection, we employ the top-of-atmosphere outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">ISCCP;</named-content></xref> dataset as a reasonable proxy variable for deep convection. To analyse the thermodynamic and dynamic characteristics of tropical weather systems, we make use of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">ERA5;</named-content></xref> dataset. All variables used in this study are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. We use the time period of 1984–2016 for ISCCP and ERA5 variables and, to match the OLR field, all ERA5 variables are spatially regridded, using bilinear interpolation, onto a  1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° grid and temporally resampled from hourly frequency into 3-hourly means.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1226">List of variables used in this paper.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable Name</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Symbol</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dataset</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Top-of-atmosphere outgoing</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">OLR</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ISCCP</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">longwave radiation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zonal wind</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3" morerows="5">ERA5</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meridional wind</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pressure vertical velocity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geopotential</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Specific humidity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Temperature</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rainfall accumulation</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3" morerows="1">GPM-IMERG</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rainfall intensity</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1387">For the extreme rainfall analyses, we compute two variables based on the half-hourly precipitation rate from the Global Precipitation Measurement's (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.38"><named-content content-type="pre">IMERG;</named-content></xref>. <italic>Rainfall accumulation</italic> is defined as the 3-hourly sum of the half-hourly precipitation rate, whereas <italic>rainfall intensity</italic> is defined as the 3-hourly mean of only the half-hourly precipitation rate exceeding  0.05 mm h<sup>−1</sup>. The 3 h time window is chosen to match the temporal resolution of the OLR, while we retain the high spatial resolution of  0.1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1°  to avoid smoothing out any localised extreme rainfall occurrences. For these rainfall variables, the available time period is shorter, from June 2000 to December 2016.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Separation by Phase Speed</title>
      <p id="d2e1429">We first separate large-scale convectively coupled signals into moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves. This is done by filtering the OLR anomaly field based on phase speed. The anomaly or perturbation of a field is deseasonalised by subtracting the mean and the first four harmonics of the annual cycle, and the diurnal cycle is further removed by subtracting all harmonics with period not greater than 24 h. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.39"/>, and using the approximation in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), we assume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup>, and make a classification as follows. <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1479">Moisture mode: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1530">Mixed system: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to  9 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1597">IG wave: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup></p></list-item></list> This classification is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>. Before the filtering step, we remove the TC signals using a simple method following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.40"/> based on the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">IBTrACS;</named-content></xref> dataset. This method uses a Gaussian weighting function to remove anomalies around each TC, where anomalies at the TC centre are reduced to zero and those at distance of 500 km from the centre are reduced by half (see Eq. 1 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.42"/> for more details). The remaining field is then used in the filtering following the ranges described above using the 2-D fast Fourier transform (2D-FFT) method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In this method, we employ the preprocessing steps of linearly detrending and tapering both ends of the time series at each grid point, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.44"/>, but without doing any decomposition into symmetric and antisymmetric components. Note also that, for each category, we combine eastward- and westward-propagating signals; this needs to be taken into account when interpreting the composites shown later. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows an example of the results of this separation method for a single snapshot.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1671">Snapshots of <bold>(a)</bold> total OLR anomaly, <bold>(b)</bold> sum of <bold>(c)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>, and OLR anomalies associated with <bold>(c)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(d)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(e)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(f)</bold> TCs. In <bold>(c)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>, centres of the identified OLR objects are denoted by yellow “x” markers and closed contour lines represent the OLR objects' boundaries as determined by the <monospace>tobac</monospace> algorithm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> for details).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Object Identification and Tracking</title>
      <p id="d2e1725">Having filtered the OLR into signals associated with different phase speeds, we then apply a tracking algorithm to identify filtered OLR “objects” as the tropical weather systems. We choose the Tracking and Object-Based Analysis of Clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.45"><named-content content-type="pre"><monospace>tobac</monospace>;</named-content></xref> algorithm because it has some utilities fit for our analyses here, such as its ability to track objects through a periodic boundary (e.g., periodic longitude in our global domain). As with other object detection methods, <monospace>tobac</monospace> defines connected regions around a local minimum/maximum exceeding a certain threshold as an <italic>object</italic> in a snapshot of a two-dimensional field. In our case, we identify local minima in the filtered OLR anomaly fields (i.e., negative OLR values) as we are only interested in features associated with strong deep convection. We then use <monospace>tobac</monospace> to follow the movements of objects through subsequent time steps and determine whether they belong to the same <italic>track</italic>. For each detected track, we define the instance when the magnitude of the filtered OLR anomaly around the object's centre (defined as the object's centroid) is the greatest as the track's <italic>maximum activity</italic>, or the <italic>lag 0</italic> of the track. More details on the parameter configurations that we use for <monospace>tobac</monospace> are described in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Statistical Composite</title>
      <p id="d2e1767">To obtain the general characteristics of each tropical weather system, we calculate composite averages of the thermodynamic and dynamic variables. This is done by compositing snapshots of a field in the immediate vicinity of the object's centre for all the detected tracks belonging to a type of system at their respective “lag 0”. We only use “lag 0” to increase the statistical independence of the composited snapshots, since we consider that different objects in a single track are just different life stages of the same physical weather system. Prior to this composite calculation, we separate the tracks based on their maximum activity's locations into <italic>equatorial</italic> (10° S–10° N), <italic>northern hemisphere off-equatorial</italic> (10–20° N), and <italic>southern hemisphere off-equatorial</italic> (20–10° S).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Extreme Rainfall Probability Change</title>
      <p id="d2e1788">In addition to this statistical compositing technique, in the extreme rainfall analyses, we also calculate the change in probability of extreme rainfall intensity events. An extreme rainfall intensity event is defined as an instance when rainfall intensity at each grid point exceeds its long-term  99th percentile. We compare the probability of extreme rainfall intensity events at a location for when a tropical weather system is over that location against that for all times, mathematically expressed as

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M69" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>intensity</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mtext>th</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>pct</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mtext>system “X” occurs</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>intensity</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mtext>th</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>pct</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          By construction, the denominator in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. As with the statistical composites, this quantity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also computed in the immediate vicinity of the object's centre for all the detected tracks belonging to a type of system at their respective “lag 0”.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Characteristics and Spatial Distribution of Tropical Weather Systems</title>
      <p id="d2e1877">In this section, we will present the spatial distribution and general characteristics, both thermodynamic and dynamic, of the tropical weather systems defined in the moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum framework.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1882">Frequency of occurrence of <bold>(a, e, i, m)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(b, f, j, n)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(c, g, k, o)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(d, h, l, p)</bold> TCs during <bold>(a–d)</bold> December–February, <bold>(e–h)</bold> March–May, <bold>(i–l)</bold> June–August, and <bold>(m–p)</bold> September–October. Frequency of occurrence of a system at each grid point is defined as the time frequency of that location being within the system's OLR object boundary.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1916">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> shows that moisture modes mainly occur along the edges of the deep tropics, around  15° N/S. These regions coincide with the climatological location of the moist margin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>, where the background horizontal moisture gradient is large. This is thought to be one of the supportive environmental conditions for the maintenance and growth of moisture modes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.47"/>. On the other hand, mixed systems and IG waves are more confined along the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ), especially over the Pacific and Atlantic, and over some land regions, such as equatorial Africa. We also notice that there are some occurrences of mixed systems, and, to a lesser extent, IG waves, along the northern and southern boundaries of the domain (i.e.,  30° N/S). These are likely to be the imprints of extratropical frontal bands and other systems moving with similar propagating speeds: the moist QG systems.</p>
      <p id="d2e1930">Seasonal variations in track density are consistent with the known seasonal cycle of precipitation in the tropics. For example, along the eastern Pacific during the March–May period, we can see two zonal bands where mixed systems and IG waves mainly occur (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>f, g), and these bands are also observed in precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">the double ITCZ; see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Therefore, from the weather system perspective, we posit that moisture modes might be the building blocks of the South Pacific convergence zone (SPCZ), while mixed systems and IG waves might be the building blocks of the ITCZ.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Thermodynamic Characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e1947">To answer the first question posed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>, we create composite averages of the perturbations in latent energy and DSE associated with moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves. These are shown as zonal-vertical cross sections in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a–c, we see that all three types of weather system are associated with an anomalously moist lower free troposphere (red box). This condition creates a supportive environment for deep convection by reducing the dilution of rising parcels through entrainment and detrainment processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.49"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Furthermore, as expected from the theory, moisture modes have much greater moisture perturbations compared to the other two systems, and these moisture perturbations decrease in magnitude with increasing phase speed. The composites in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> show little phase tilt with height, and this is partially a result of the compositing technique, which, as mentioned previously, combines westward- and eastward-moving systems. When these types are separated before compositing (Figs. S1 and S2), we see a clear westward phase tilt for eastward-propagating IG waves, as previously found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.50"/>, and a weaker westward tilt of moisture anomalies for eastward-propagating moisture modes.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1969">Zonal-vertical cross sections of the composites of <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> latent energy and <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> DSE anomalies for <bold>(a, d)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(b, e)</bold> mixed systems, and <bold>(c, f)</bold> IG waves in the equatorial region. Red box denotes the lower free troposphere, defined as layers between 500 and 850 hPa. Note that the colour bar ranges for <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> and for <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> are different. Only statistically significant values at 95 % level are shown, based on the two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2020">In the DSE anomaly profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>d–f), all three systems show negative anomalies just above the boundary layer, which act to lower the convective inhibition in those layers and increase the chance of deep convection. However, we do not see any significant differences in DSE anomaly magnitudes among the three systems. Unlike the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation, the DSE anomaly varies only weakly with the system's propagating speed. Hence, although the ratio of DSE to latent energy anomalies (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases with phase speed as hypothesised in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), it is mainly due to the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone, rather than the changes in both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.51"/>, which showed that the numerator in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of any relevant time scale. Moreover, despite the fact that the absolute magnitude of the latent energy anomaly is always larger than that of DSE, we find that the <italic>relative</italic> role between moisture and temperature does decrease with the system's propagating speed.</p>
      <p id="d2e2104">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> only shows the profiles for the weather systems in the equatorial region, but the above results also hold true in general for the systems in the off-equatorial regions (not shown). There are, however, some regional differences among different ocean basins, as exemplified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>. Over the Western Pacific region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d–f), the profiles of both thermodynamic variables and the vertical velocity look very similar to those over the tropics in general (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a–c). Some noticeable differences are that the latent energy anomaly profiles for all the three systems have slightly larger magnitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d) and that they also have slightly stronger anomalous upward motion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>f), but the overall profile shapes are very much the same as those in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a–c. Over the Eastern Pacific, the moisture perturbations are even larger (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>g), particularly those in the lower levels for moisture modes. Here, an interesting difference can be seen in the DSE anomaly profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>h), where there are some positive anomalies near the top of the boundary layer (around 900 hPa) for all three types of systems. We also notice that the anomalous vertical velocity profiles over the Eastern Pacific have somewhat different shapes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>i), with a larger vertical velocity amplitude at lower levels; this is particularly visible for moisture modes. These contrasts between the Western and Eastern Pacific might be related to differences in background states, such as sea surface temperature, tropospheric stability, and vertical velocity, of these two regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2135">Vertical profiles of the composites of <bold>(a, d, g)</bold> latent energy, <bold>(b, e, h)</bold> DSE, and <bold>(c, f, i)</bold> pressure vertical velocity anomalies for (brown) moisture modes, (green) mixed systems, and (magenta) IG waves in the equatorial region over <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> the global tropics, <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> the Western Pacific, and <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> the Eastern Pacific, averaged over a  4° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4°  box around the object centre. Note that the ranges of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis are different in different columns. Vertical dashed lines in the middle and right columns mark the zero value on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Dynamic Characteristics</title>
      <p id="d2e2202">As briefly mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, systems with similar thermodynamics can occur under different dynamical structures or balances. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> shows composites of dynamical fields for moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves occurring in three different latitudinal ranges calculated using the same statistical averaging technique as before, that is, composites are centred around the detected centroids and combine both eastward- and westward-propagating systems. We also show the composites for TCs to compare with, although detailed investigations of the dynamic characteristics of TCs are beyond the scope of this study.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2211">Composites of (shading) OLR, (vectors) 850 hPa horizontal wind <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (green contours) 850 hPa geopotential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and (yellow contours) 850 hPa vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) anomaly fields for <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(j)</bold>–<bold>(k)</bold> TCs in the <bold>(a, d, g)</bold> equatorial, <bold>(b, e, h, j)</bold> northern hemisphere off-equatorial, and <bold>(c, f, i, k)</bold> southern hemisphere off-equatorial regions. Note that the vector length scales, the green contour intervals, and the yellow contour intervals are different in different rows. Units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are m and  Pa s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Only statistically significant values at 95 % level are shown, based on the two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2317">In the equatorial region, moisture modes are characterised by low-level convergence, mostly due to the confluence of northwesterly and southwesterly anomalous winds (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a). The horizontal convergence is accompanied by significant anomalous upward motion in the area of relatively low pressure around the core of the convective region. This low-level dynamical structure very much resembles the theoretical schematic of the equatorial moisture mode in Fig. 5 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.53"/>, although the strong zonal pressure gradient is not as apparent here in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a. This is partially a result of combining both westward- and eastward-propagating signals into a single composite; when the two are separated, the zonal gradient in 850 hPa geopotential is stronger for the eastward-moving moisture mode than the westward-moving one. In the off-equatorial region, moisture modes have a different dynamical configuration, characterised by a vortex rotating in the cyclonic sense (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b–c). The anomalous horizontal flow of this vortex is roughly in geostrophic balance, as the wind vectors are almost tangential to the geopotential contour lines. The most interesting feature of the off-equatorial moisture mode, however, is the fact that the convectively active region is not collocated with the low-pressure centre, unlike in the low-level structure of the TC (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>j–k). Instead, the anomalous OLR and pressure velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are slightly shifted to the east of the vortex centre, where the low-level flow is poleward. This displacement puts the precipitation in a region of positive moisture advection (see also later in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>), which is argued by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.54"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.55"/> to be key to the growth and eastward propagation of moisture modes: the moisture-vortex instability (MVI) mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d2e2348">As with the moisture modes, mixed systems show different dynamical structures near the equator compared to off the equator. The equatorial mixed systems have a strong low-level horizontal confluence, which also coincides with the region of convection and upward motion (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>d). The zonal pressure gradient is more apparent here, with a minimum in geopotential anomaly located to the east of the convergence, consistent with the schematic in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.56"/>. In the off-equatorial region, mixed systems are also associated with a cyclonic vortex (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>e–f), but with a weaker vortex strength and a less balanced flow than for moisture modes. The vortex size is also larger in off-equatorial mixed systems and this, again, matches with its theoretical illustration in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.57"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2361">For IG waves, the contrast between equatorial and off-equatorial dynamical structures is less clear than for other system types (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>g–i). While the low-level anomalous convergence associated with the OLR and upward motion anomalies is evident in the equatorial IG waves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>g), the low-level dynamics of the off-equatorial IG waves is dominated only by speed convergence with no clear signals of any rotational flow (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>h–i).</p>
      <p id="d2e2370">An important property of a dynamical system is its proximity to balanced flow. For the off-equatorial systems, a relevant balance condition is geostrophic balance. Qualitative comparison of the alignment of the winds and geopotential contours in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> suggests that the systems become more unbalanced with increased phase speed. For the equatorial systems, however, the relevant balance condition is nonlinear balance, and this cannot be simply assessed from the winds and geopotential. Instead, we compute a quantity defined as the deviation from nonlinear balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.58"/>,

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M90" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal Laplacian operator, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the planetary vorticity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ζ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the relative vorticity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the meridional gradient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal gradient operator. Nonlinear balance is a generalised horizontal balance condition which includes many of the well-known balances, such as the gradient wind, cyclostrophic, and geostrophic balances as special cases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The composites of the low-level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>. It clearly shows that the faster moving systems are more horizontally unbalanced than the slower moving ones, even for those in the equatorial region. Further decomposition suggests that most of the deviation from balance condition comes from the first three terms on the right hand side of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), that is, the deviation from geostrophic balance (not shown). This implies that, as for the thermodynamics, there is also a spectrum of dynamics from balanced moisture modes to unbalanced IG waves, in agreement with the theory of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.60"/>.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2524">Composites of the anomaly of the deviation from nonlinear balance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) computed at 850 hPa for <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(j)</bold>–<bold>(k)</bold> TCs in the <bold>(a, d, g)</bold> equatorial, <bold>(b, e, h, j)</bold> northern hemisphere off-equatorial, and <bold>(c, f, i, k)</bold> southern hemisphere off-equatorial regions. Each instance is smoothed three times using a 1-2-1 filter in both horizontal directions prior to the composite averaging. Only statistically significant values at 95 % level are shown, based on the two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2584">As in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>, it is of interest to examine how the dynamic characteristics vary geographically. Here, we present some examples that can also be used to elaborate the MVI mechanism in more detail. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b–c show that the convectively active region of off-equatorial moisture modes is where the flow of the cyclonic vortex is poleward. This is consistent with MVI theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.61"/>, which states that moisture build-up owing to positive meridional moisture advection leads to precipitation that is slightly in-phase with the vortex, which can later destabilise the moisture modes by strengthening the vortex through vortex stretching. This is demonstrated specifically for the Western Pacific during June–August in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>b, c, where the background specific humidity increases towards the equator and the precipitation maximum occurs in the poleward low-level flow. However, moisture modes in the northern hemisphere off-equatorial Indian Ocean at the same time of year show a contrasting low-level dynamical structure (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>e). In this case, the convectively active region is not to the east, but to the west, of its vortex centre, where the anomalous flow is equatorward. This can be explained by looking at the distribution of the background moisture in that location. During this South Asian monsoon season, the Indian subcontinent to the north is actually more humid than the equatorial Indian Ocean. This reverses the background meridional moisture gradient (line plot in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>e), allowing an equatorward flow to produce a positive moisture advection. Such a moisture gradient reversal does not happen in the southern hemisphere off-equatorial side of the sector, therefore, the OLR anomaly in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>f still occurs to the east side of the vortex. We find our results here consistent with the geographical variations of the slow-moving vortical disturbances investigated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.62"/>. While the MVI mechanism described so far is useful in elucidating the dynamical structure of the off-equatorial moisture mode, it cannot, however, explain why the convectively active region of the equatorial moisture mode occurs where the background meridional moisture gradient is virtually zero (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a, d). While detailed analyses of the maintenance mechanisms of equatorial moisture modes are left to future work, preliminary analysis of the MSE budget (not shown) suggests that zonal advection, rather than meridional advection, may play a greater role for the growth and propagation of equatorial moisture modes than for their off-equatorial counterparts. This is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.63"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.64"/> who also argued that equatorial moisture modes, such as the MJO, grow through different mechanisms which do not require a large local meridional moisture gradient.</p>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e2617">As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a–c, but only for moisture modes over <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> the Western Pacific and <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> the Indian Ocean during June–August. Line plot to the right of each panel shows the composite of the 850 hPa specific humidity field, averaged zonally across the domain.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Impacts on Extreme Rainfall</title>
      <p id="d2e2649">We associate rainfall with a weather system if it falls within a 1000 km radius of the system centre at any time during its lifetime (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). This method is chosen to also account for rainfall in the vicinity of the systems but outside of their OLR object boundaries. According to this attribution method, the four tropical weather systems studied here, including TCs, are found to be associated altogether with about 60 % of total rainfall received within the global deep tropics (20° S–20° N; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). Individual influences of moisture modes and mixed systems are each associated with almost 20 % of total rainfall. Meanwhile, IG waves and TCs individually contribute much less to rainfall in this region, only up to 5 % each, due partly to their less frequent and less widespread occurrences compared to moisture modes and mixed systems (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). Besides these individual contributions from the four systems, the “compound” influences of more than one type of system (i.e., occurring at the same location and at the same time) are also significant, about 10 % of total rainfall (not shown), making the “sum” term in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a greater than 50 %. If we only consider heavy rainfall as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>b, defined as rainfall above an accumulation of  30 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the total contribution from the four systems investigated here increases to almost 80 %, leaving only around 20 %–25 % of unexplained high rainfall events. This indicates that the weather systems defined in this study account for the vast majority of heavy and impactful rain events in the tropics.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e2684">Snapshot of 3-hourly rainfall accumulation overlaid with <bold>(a)</bold> the 1000 km radius circles around the systems' detected centres and <bold>(b)</bold> the OLR object boundaries as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e2703"><bold>(a)</bold> Percentages of seasonal rainfall accumulation within the deep tropics associated with moisture modes, mixed systems, IG waves, and TCs, as well as the sum and the residual. <bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold>, but only for rainfall accumulation greater than or equal to  30 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The “sum” term here is the sum of the four individual systems and the “compound” occurrences of more than one type of system at a location (not shown). The “residual” term includes rainfall not associated with any of the four system types.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2740">To further investigate the potential impacts of these weather systems on tropical rainfall, we assess the general characteristics of rainfall associated with each of these systems. In the equatorial region, mean rainfall intensity around the centres of moisture modes, mixed systems, and IG waves at their time of maximum OLR activity can reach 2 mm h<sup>−1</sup>, with mixed systems having the highest median and upper quartile of the distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a). In the off-equatorial regions, both in the northern and southern hemispheres, all systems except TCs have considerably lower values of their associated mean rainfall intensity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b, c). In these regions, moisture modes have larger mean precipitation compared to mixed systems and IG waves, but still rank below TCs. We also compare the systems by the areal maximum of rainfall intensity around their centres (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>d–f). Equatorial moisture modes and mixed systems have very similar distributions of core maximum rainfall intensity, unlike their core averaged distributions in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a. This could possibly mean that the mesoscale structure of rainfall around the centre of equatorial mixed systems is more widespread, whereas that around equatorial moisture modes is more “patchy”.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e2765"><bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> Distributions of areal mean rainfall intensity within the cores of the tropical weather systems in the <bold>(a)</bold> equatorial, <bold>(b)</bold> northern hemisphere off-equatorial, and <bold>(c)</bold> southern hemisphere off-equatorial regions. <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold>, but for areal maximum. The core of a system is defined as a  4° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4° region around its detected centre at its “lag 0” time. The half-width of a violin at a rainfall intensity value represents its probability density (i.e., frequency of occurrence normalised by bin size). Numbers below each violin in <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> are their respective total counts. Note that we exclude TCs in the equatorial region due to limited number of samples, and that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis ranges for <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> are different.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2834">The fact that the systems we identify have characteristics of high rainfall intensity as described above means that their occurrences increase the chance of extreme rainfall intensity events (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> for the definition of an extreme event). This is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>, which shows the likelihood change of an extreme event at a given location relative to a system's centre at the time of maximum OLR activity. In the equatorial region, extreme rainfall intensity events become <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.12</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.85</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> times more likely around the vicinity of moisture modes and mixed systems, respectively, whereas IG waves have a smaller but still significant impact of about a  300 % increase in extreme probability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>a, d, g). This is in line with the previous results in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>, where mixed systems are associated with higher mean rainfall intensity than the other equatorial systems. Off the equator, however, moisture modes have a larger increase in extreme likelihood of up to 650 %  around their centre (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b–c), followed by mixed systems and IG waves. Note also that the region of influence (i.e., the spatial scale of the green shaded region) is larger for IG waves than for moisture modes because faster-moving systems travel further within the 3 h compositing period.</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e2864">Probability ratio (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) of extreme rainfall intensity events associated with <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(i)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(j)</bold>–<bold>(k)</bold> TCs in the <bold>(a, d, g)</bold> equatorial, <bold>(b, e, h, j)</bold> northern hemisphere off-equatorial, and <bold>(c, f, i, k)</bold> southern hemisphere off-equatorial regions. Only statistically significant values at 95 % level are shown, based on the two-tailed Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2917">The extreme probability change analysis in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>, albeit indicating how strongly each type of system can modulate extreme rainfall occurrences, may not tell us the whole story of how impactful each system is to extreme rainfall in the tropics. For example, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>j, k show that TCs are associated with a much larger change in the likelihood of extreme events compared to the off-equatorial moisture modes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b, c). However, from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, we know that the occurrence of TCs is much lower and less widespread than that of moisture modes in the off-equatorial regions. By also taking into account this frequency factor, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/> we show that moisture modes are, in fact, associated with more extreme rainfall intensity events along the edges of the deep tropics. About 45 %–75 % of extreme rainfall intensity events in the 15–20° N/S  region can be associated with moisture modes (we use the same attribution method as illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). This number is about as large as that of extreme events associated with TCs in the TC-prone regions, such as the Philippines and off the west coast of Central America (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>g). In fact, in some regions that are commonly associated with TC occurrences like the Caribbean and the Bay of Bengal, moisture modes contribute a higher percentage of extreme rainfall events than TCs. This should give us some sense of how impactful the off-equatorial moisture mode is in terms of extreme 3-hourly rainfall events despite being only associated with only around 20 % of the region's total rainfall (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>b). For the equatorial region, the extreme events are more associated with mixed systems (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>c) and, to a much lesser extent, IG waves (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>e), as expected from the previous analyses. In the equatorial region, particularly along the Pacific ITCZ, high intensity rainfall events are disproportionately associated with mixed systems – these systems contribute almost half of the extreme rainfall (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>c), but only 30 % of the total rainfall (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>d).</p>

      <fig id="F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e2949">Percentages of (left) extreme rainfall intensity events and (right) total rainfall accumulation associated with <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(b)</bold> moisture modes, <bold>(c)</bold>–<bold>(d)</bold> mixed systems, <bold>(e)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> IG waves, and <bold>(g)</bold>–<bold>(h)</bold> TCs. Note that in some regions the sum exceeds 100 % as we do not exclude “compound” influences of more than one type of system.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://wcd.copernicus.org/articles/7/2171/2026/wcd-7-2171-2026-f13.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Summary and Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2991">In this study, we divide the synoptic-to-planetary-scale convectively coupled systems in the tropics, other than TCs, into three categories based on their phase speed. The slow-moving systems are dominated by strong moisture perturbations and are called <italic>moisture modes</italic>. The fast-moving systems have weaker moisture anomalies but significant temperature perturbations, reminiscent of <italic>IG waves</italic>. The third category comprises systems with moderate propagating speed that have mixed characteristics of the other two, which we refer to as <italic>mixed systems</italic>. We employ this classification to define object-based weather systems in the tropics in a similar sense to those in the mid-latitudes. We find that moisture modes tend to occur along the edges of the deep tropics, confirming the hypothesis that a strong horizontal moisture gradient, as found along the climatological moist margin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.65"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, is fundamental to their growth and propagation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.66"/>. On the other hand, mixed systems and IG waves are more commonly found closer to the equator, mostly along the ITCZ and especially over the Western Pacific warm pool. There are also some mixed system occurrences along the subtropical edges (i.e.,  30° N/S), and these are likely to be the imprints of the moist QG system, which may be considered to be a mixed system with a small Rossby number and strong influences from the extratropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.67"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3015">Analyses of the thermodynamic perturbation profiles show that the magnitude of moisture perturbations decreases from moisture modes to IG waves. However, the magnitude of temperature perturbations, here represented by the low-level DSE anomaly, does not seem to change with phase speed. Our results here support those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.68"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.69"/> that the ratio of DSE to latent energy perturbation magnitudes (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) increases from the slow-moving moisture mode to the fast-moving IG wave, as slower moving systems have a longer time scale allowing them to reach the WTG condition. We also find that this is mainly due to the changes in latent energy alone rather than in both moisture and DSE anomalies, consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.70"/>. However, in contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.71"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.72"/>, we do not find that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for IG waves, or even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mixed systems, indicating that some of the scaling values they used might be unrealistic. Rather, we find ratios closer to those found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.73"/>, which are, expressed in g kg<sup>−1</sup>:K units, about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for IG waves and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mixed systems. In other words, the moisture perturbation does not become negligible in the faster-moving systems, but the <italic>relative</italic> importance of moisture and temperature does change with phase speed.</p>
      <p id="d2e3118">We also test the hypothesis that systems with similar thermodynamics (i.e., similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can occur under different types of dynamical configuration or balance. Here we find that moisture modes in the equatorial region (10° S–10° N) have convergent-type dynamics, where the convectively active region is marked by the confluence of anomalous winds. Off the equator (10–20° N/S), the dynamics of moisture modes are more rotational, with the anomalous winds almost perfectly balancing the pressure perturbation field. A notable characteristic of the off-equatorial moisture mode is that its convectively active region is not collocated with its low-pressure centre as in TCs, but is shifted to over the poleward flow of the low-level vortex. This provides observational support for these slow-moving systems being energised by the moisture-vortex instability discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.74"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.75"/>. Further evidence of this mechanism is found by focusing on the northern Indian ocean region in Boreal Summer. In this region, the moisture gradient is reversed, and this is associated with a shift of the ascent region of moisture modes to the western side of the disturbance, in line with the predictions of MVI theory. This signifies that the characteristics of moisture modes in particular, and perhaps the other tropical weather systems in general, are influenced by the underlying background state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.76"><named-content content-type="pre">see also e.g.,</named-content></xref>. It is therefore worth exploring in future research how these characteristics might change under the changing background state due to warming. For example, some studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.77"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> indicate that the subtropical Western Pacific has a higher column water vapour trend than the equatorial Western Pacific. It remains an open question how this projected weakening of the meridional moisture gradient over the warm pool might change the frequency of occurrence as well as the characteristics of moisture modes over the region.</p>
      <p id="d2e3148">The distinction between equatorial and off-equatorial dynamics is also seen in mixed systems, but becomes less discernible in IG waves. For both equatorial and off-equatorial systems, we find that the proximity to nonlinear balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.78"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> decreases with phase speeds; faster-moving systems tend to be more unbalanced than slower-moving systems, consistent with the theory of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.79"/>. We therefore conclude that, as in the thermodynamics, there is also a dynamical spectrum from the balanced moisture modes to the unbalanced IG waves.</p>
      <p id="d2e3160">Connecting back to our main motivation laid out in  the Introduction, we argue that our study here is an attempt to define a set of synoptic-scale weather systems in the tropics analogous to those in the extratropics. As in the extratropics, continuous atmospheric waves are the “background” dynamics of the weather. For example, a typical Rossby wave train in the midlatitudes can give rise to several pairs of high- and low-pressure systems. These highs and lows are the extratropical “weather systems”, not the Rossby wave itself. These synoptic-scale systems are the bridge between the planetary-scale background dynamics and the smaller-scale tangible weather occurrences, such as thunderstorms and wind gusts. Applying this idea to the tropics, we posit that equatorial waves, including the MJO, are the dynamics occurring in the “background”, and they can spawn synoptic-scale weather systems investigated in this study. For instance, ER waves are characterised by sets of gyres, and, among these, the cyclonic gyres may be identified as moisture mode “objects”, or may amplify and become TCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Furthermore, as different types of waves commonly co-occur, our methods here implicitly take into account the interactions among different waves in the same phase speed category, which are argued to have similar thermodynamic characteristics, when we do the spectral filtering. In this way, a detected synoptic “object” may be a manifestation of those interactions in the background, rather than representing only a single type of wave.</p>
      <p id="d2e3168">The characteristics of the weather systems we define, including their dominant dynamical balances, phase relations between vertical and horizontal motion, and thermodynamic structure are broadly consistent with the prototype weather systems described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.81"/> based on a theoretical scaling of the governing equations. This suggests that the moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum provides a useful framework for separating tropical systems by their dynamics.</p>
      <p id="d2e3174">Another aspect of the three types of weather system that we study here is their impacts on tropical rainfall, especially on rainfall events that are considered extreme. The synoptic weather systems defined here (including TCs) are associated with almost 60 % of total rainfall received in the deep tropics and mainly with events with high rainfall accumulation. Moisture modes are particularly important for precipitation in the off-equatorial regions, where they are associated with 45 %–75 % of extreme 3-hourly rainfall events, almost as much as TCs in TC-prone regions. On the other hand, mixed systems and, to a lesser extent, IG waves are more important for precipitation in the equatorial regions, especially along the Pacific ITCZ. These results provide a new insight on the relationship between atmospheric phenomena and precipitation in the tropics. Past studies usually only attributed most of the tropical mean and extreme precipitation to MCSs and TCs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Here, we aim to define weather systems on synoptic scales similar to the scales of TCs, and we therefore do not consider MCSs directly. Rather, we present the attribution of rainfall to the three systems comprising the moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d2e3182">Finally, we note some caveats of the weather system identification we present. By decomposing based on phase speed, we may “split” a robust signal of a coherent object just because it moves with speed close to the phase speed threshold we prescribe in our methods. Furthermore, we decompose objects by <italic>zonal</italic> phase speed, and objects with substantial meridional phase speed may be misrepresented as having lower phase speed. Additionally, our fundamental assumption that phase speed is a proxy for thermodynamics also has some limitations. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) comes from a reasonable assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for typical synoptic-scale systems near the equator. This approximation becomes less valid for systems occurring farther from the equator, as illustrated in the following example. A moisture mode system with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km occurring at  10° latitude will have a Burger number of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and therefore <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will always be greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for this slow-moving category (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup>). However, if the same system occurs at  25°  latitude, its Burger number will be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will no longer be greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We attempt to avoid these systems for which the approximation in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) is invalid by only including systems whose centroids are not beyond  20° latitude in the off-equatorial moisture mode composites, but even then systems with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km will have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Bu</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, our results on off-equatorial moisture modes should be treated and interpreted more carefully, as they are likely to be “contaminated” by systems technically belonging to the mixed system category.</p>
      <p id="d2e3410">While the theory hypothesises that systems with similar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have similar thermodynamics, observational studies have shown that eastward- and westward-propagating disturbances with similar phase speed can have different vertical profiles and phase tilts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.83"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Since our compositing technique combines both eastward- and westward-propagating disturbances, it can hide such phase tilts or other asymmetries associated with the direction of phase propagation. However, separating the eastward- and westward-propagating signals (see Supplement) does not change the general conclusions described above.</p>
      <p id="d2e3429">Another caveat of this study is that we use OLR to represent convective signals. Even though OLR has long been used, and is still widely used, to study large-scale convectively coupled signals in the tropics, it is not objectively the best variable to use, as some large stratiform-cloud covered areas may also be captured as strong OLR activity. The 3-hourly time resolution of the ISCCP dataset we use is also a limitation, and may not be sufficient to capture the fastest-moving IG wave signals. In addition to these, we also recognise that the removal of diurnal cycle excludes the most important rainfall-related processes over coastal areas and islands. Moreover, this could also underestimate the activity of IG wave, as some previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.84"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> suggest that this fast-moving system is tightly connected to diurnal convective activity. Nevertheless, we believe that this study provides an important step towards a coherent description of synoptic weather in the tropics from a more object-based weather system perspective. This study is also the first one to apply the theoretical framework of a moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum towards this goal. Future research could use this framework to assist extreme weather forecasting, help understand tropical rainfall changes in a warmer climate, and contribute to our understanding of the complex relation between large-scale dynamics and convection in the tropics.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Relating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the Speed of a Disturbance</title>
      <p id="d2e3460">Here we show that the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be written in terms of the phase speed of a disturbance. To do so, we perform a scale analysis of temperature and humidity anomalies in the atmosphere following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.85"/>. Assuming a dominant balance in the momentum equation between the geopotential gradient and the velocity tendency we may write,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the scales for geopotential anomalies and horizontal velocity anomalies, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are characteristic length and time scales. We follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.86"/> and assume that the time and length scales are related by the phase speed of the disturbance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, so that

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>A2</label><mml:math id="M138" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The geopotential is related to temperature via the hydrostatic equation

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M139" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        For a disturbance spanning the depth of the troposphere, this implies

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>A4</label><mml:math id="M140" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.87"/>, we may write this in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the phase speed of the first-baroclinic gravity wave,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>A5</label><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical difference in dry static energy over the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e3719">Finally, we derive a scaling for specific humidity anomalies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To do so, we assume the leading order balance in the moisture equation is between vertical moisture advection and precipitation. We further assume that precipitation acts to remove humidity anomalies over a timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We then have,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>A6</label><mml:math id="M146" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical velocity scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical difference in specific humidity over the troposphere and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the depth of the troposphere. Mass continuity implies that the the vertical velocity is related to the horizontal velocity as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, giving

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>A7</label><mml:math id="M151" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e3854">Combining Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E6"/>), (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E9"/>), and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.E11"/>) gives,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>A8</label><mml:math id="M152" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where we have identified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and defined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This equation shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scales with the square of the phase velocity of a disturbance.</p>
      <p id="d2e3995">Note that the above derivation is limited to the tropical regime, in which one may neglect the possible influence of the Coriolis force on the scaling of geopotential anomalies, and it assumes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not depend on the phase speed of the disturbance. A more comprehensive scaling analysis that does not make either of these assumptions may be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.88"/>, in which a similar scaling for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mode</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found and is employed in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>), provided the Burger number is sufficiently large as detailed in the manuscript.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Parameters of <monospace>tobac</monospace>'s Identification and Tracking Functions</title>
      <p id="d2e4037">Below are the detailed parameters we use to run the algorithm. For more details, see <monospace>tobac</monospace>'s documentation (<uri>https://tobac.readthedocs.io</uri>, last access: 8 April 2026). <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e4048"><monospace>parameters_features</monospace> is used in the object identification step. <monospace>tobac</monospace> allows for multiple thresholds to better capture multiple objects that are connected through a contiguous region of less restrictive threshold values. As we aim to detect strong negative OLR anomaly objects, we set the <monospace>target</monospace> to be <monospace>minimum</monospace>. We choose <monospace>weighted_diff</monospace> as the <monospace>position_threshold</monospace> so that every object's location is represented by its centroid. To avoid detecting noise, we apply a moderate two-dimensional Gaussian filter (<monospace>sigma_threshold = 1.0</monospace>) prior to object identification, and reject any detected object with less than 4 connected grid points (<monospace>n_min_threshold = 4</monospace>). Lastly, we set the second horizontal dimension of the field (<monospace>hdim_2</monospace>, which is longitude) to be periodic.</p></list-item></list>

<preformat><![CDATA[    parameters_features["threshold"]
    = [-2.0, -2.5, -3.0, -3.5, -4.0] * olr_std_dev
    parameters_features["target"] = "minimum"
    parameters_features["position_threshold"]
    = "weighted_diff"
    parameters_features["sigma_threshold"] = 1.0
    parameters_features["n_min_threshold"] = 4
    parameters_features["PBC_flag"] = "hdim_2"]]></preformat>

<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e4089"><monospace>parameters_linking</monospace> is used in linking two detected objects in subsequent time steps in the tracking step. <monospace>v_max</monospace> is the maximum propagating speed of each system type as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, that is, 9,  27,  50, and  10 m s<sup>−1</sup> for moisture modes, mixed systems, IG waves, and TCs, respectively. We set <monospace>stubs = 3</monospace> to disregard any track with a lifetime of less than 3 subsequent time steps (i.e., 9 h). As in <monospace>parameters_features</monospace>, we set <monospace>hdim_2</monospace> (i.e., longitude) to be periodic from <monospace>min_h2 = 0</monospace> to <monospace>max_h2 = len(longitude) - 1</monospace>.</p></list-item></list>

<preformat><![CDATA[    parameters_linking["v_max"] = v_max
    parameters_linking["stubs"] = 3
    parameters_linking["PBC_flag"] = "hdim_2"
    parameters_linking["min_h2"] = 0
    parameters_linking["max_h2"] = len(longitude) - 1]]></preformat>

<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e4137"><monospace>parameters_segmentation</monospace> is used in determining the detected objects' boundaries. For this routine, <monospace>tobac</monospace> only accepts a single threshold, so we choose the least restrictive value.</p></list-item></list>

<preformat><![CDATA[    parameters_segmentation["threshold"]
    = -2.0 * olr_std_dev
    parameters_segmentation["target"] = "minimum"
    parameters_segmentation["PBC_flag"] = "hdim_2"]]></preformat>
</p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4157">The ERA5 dataset is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.143582cf</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.89"/>. The GPM-IMERG dataset is available at <uri>https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/directory</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.90"/>. Code used for analyses are available at <uri>https://github.com/m-reyhan-respati/trop-wx-sys-characs</uri> (last access: 5 November 2026; <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23906712</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.91"/>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e4182">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-2171-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-2171-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4191">MRR and MS developed the study conception and design. Analysis was performed by MRR. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MRR and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4197">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Weather and Climate Dynamics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the author also has no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4207">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4213">We thank Ángel F. Adames Corraliza for insightful discussions.  This research was undertaken with the assistance of resources from the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI Australia), a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)-enabled capability supported by the Australian Government. We also acknowledge Australia's climate simulator (ACCESS-NRI), funded by NCRIS, for their maintenance of virtual environments.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4218">This research has been supported by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Weather of the 21st Century (grant no. CE230100012).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4224">This paper was edited by Nili Harnik and reviewed by Kuniaki Inoue, Suqin Duan, and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adames(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Adames, Á. F.: The Basic Equations under Weak Temperature Gradient Balance: Formulation, Scaling, and Types of Convectively Coupled Motions, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 2087–2108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0215.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-21-0215.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Adames and Kim(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Adames, Á. F. and Kim, D.: The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 913–941, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Adames and Maloney(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Adames, Á. F. and Maloney, E. D.: Moisture Mode Theory's Contribution to Advances in our Understanding of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Other Tropical Disturbances, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 7, 72–85, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00172-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40641-021-00172-4</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Adames and Ming(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Adames, Á. F. and Ming, Y.: Interactions between Water Vapor and Potential Vorticity in Synoptic-Scale Monsoonal Disturbances: Moisture Vortex Instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 2083–2106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0310.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-17-0310.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Adames et al.(2019)Adames, Kim, Clark, Ming, and Inoue</label><mixed-citation>Adames, Á. F., Kim, D., Clark, S. K., Ming, Y., and Inoue, K.: Scale Analysis of Moist Thermodynamics in a Simple Model and the Relationship between Moisture Modes and Gravity Waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 3863–3881, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0121.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-19-0121.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Ahmed(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed, F.: The MJO on the Equatorial Beta Plane: An Eastward-Propagating Rossby Wave Induced by Meridional Moisture Advection, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 3115–3135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0071.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-21-0071.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Ahmed and Neelin(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed, F. and Neelin, J. D.: Reverse Engineering the Tropical Precipitation–Buoyancy Relationship, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1587–1608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0333.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-17-0333.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Aiyyer et al.(2012)Aiyyer, Mekonnen, and Schreck</label><mixed-citation>Aiyyer, A., Mekonnen, A., and Schreck, C. J.: Projection of Tropical Cyclones on Wavenumber–Frequency-Filtered Equatorial Waves, J. Climate, 25, 3653–3658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00451.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00451.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Back and Bretherton(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Back, L. E. and Bretherton, C. S.: Geographic variability in the export of moist static energy and vertical motion profiles in the tropical Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026672</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bernardez and Back(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Bernardez, M. and Back, L.: Integrating Thermodynamic and Dynamic Views on the Control of the Top-Heaviness of Convection in the Pacific ITCZ With Weak Temperature Gradient Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 16, e2022MS003455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022MS003455</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Berry et al.(2011)Berry, Reeder, and Jakob</label><mixed-citation>Berry, G., Reeder, M. J., and Jakob, C.: A global climatology of atmospheric fronts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046451</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Biswas et al.(2026)Biswas, Sukhatme, and Gayen</label><mixed-citation>Biswas, S., Sukhatme, J., and Gayen, B.: Impact of background conditions on the structure and propagation of the boreal summer quasi-biweekly oscillation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,  e70267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.70267</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bolin(1955)</label><mixed-citation>Bolin, B.: Numerical Forecasting with the Barotropic Model, Tellus, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8770" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8770</ext-link>, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Borger et al.(2022)Borger, Beirle, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Borger, C., Beirle, S., and Wagner, T.: Analysis of global trends of total column water vapour from multiple years of OMI observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10603–10621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10603-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-10603-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chadwick et al.(2013)Chadwick, Boutle, and Martin</label><mixed-citation>Chadwick, R., Boutle, I., and Martin, G.: Spatial Patterns of Precipitation Change in CMIP5: Why the Rich Do Not Get Richer in the Tropics, J. Climate, 26, 3803–3822, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00543.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00543.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Charney(1955)</label><mixed-citation>Charney, J.: The Use of the Primitive Equations of Motion in Numerical Prediction, Tellus, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8772" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8772</ext-link>, 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Chen and Houze Jr(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, S. S. and Houze Jr, R. A.: Diurnal variation and life-cycle of deep convective systems over the tropical pacific warm pool, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 357–388, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712353806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49712353806</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Chikira(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Chikira, M.: Eastward-Propagating Intraseasonal Oscillation Represented by Chikira–Sugiyama Cumulus Parameterization. Part II: Understanding Moisture Variation under Weak Temperature Gradient Balance, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 615–639, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-038.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-13-038.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S): Complete ERA5 Global Atmospheric Reanalysis, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.143582cf</ext-link>,  2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dowdy and Catto(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Dowdy, A. J. and Catto, J. L.: Extreme weather caused by concurrent cyclone, front and thunderstorm occurrences, Sci. Rep., 7, 40359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep40359</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Feng et al.(2023)Feng, Yang, Hodges, and Methven</label><mixed-citation>Feng, X., Yang, G.-Y., Hodges, K. I., and Methven, J.: Equatorial waves as useful precursors to tropical cyclone occurrence and intensification, Nat. Commun., 14, 511, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36055-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-36055-5</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Frank and Roundy(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Frank, W. M. and Roundy, P. E.: The Role of Tropical Waves in Tropical Cyclogenesis, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2397–2417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3204.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR3204.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gonzalez et al.(2023)Gonzalez, Howard, Ferrett, Frame, Martínez-Alvarado, Methven, and Woolnough</label><mixed-citation>Gonzalez, P. L. M., Howard, E., Ferrett, S., Frame, T. H. A., Martínez-Alvarado, O., Methven, J., and Woolnough, S. J.: Weather patterns in Southeast Asia: Enhancing high-impact weather subseasonal forecast skill, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 149, 19–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4378</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Haertel and Kiladis(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Haertel, P. T. and Kiladis, G. N.: Dynamics of 2-Day Equatorial Waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2707–2721, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3352.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3352.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Heikenfeld et al.(2019)Heikenfeld, Marinescu, Christensen, Watson-Parris, Senf, van den Heever, and Stier</label><mixed-citation>Heikenfeld, M., Marinescu, P. J., Christensen, M., Watson-Parris, D., Senf, F., van den Heever, S. C., and Stier, P.: tobac 1.2: towards a flexible framework for tracking and analysis of clouds in diverse datasets, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4551–4570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4551-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4551-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horányi, Muñoz-Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla, Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren, Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger, Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janisková, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti, de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Hewson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Hewson, T. D.: Objective fronts, Meteorol. Appl., 5, 37–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482798000553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1350482798000553</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Huffman et al.(2020)Huffman, Bolvin, Braithwaite, Hsu, Joyce, Kidd, Nelkin, Sorooshian, Stocker, Tan, Wolff, and Xie</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K.-L., Joyce, R. J., Kidd, C., Nelkin, E. J., Sorooshian, S., Stocker, E. F., Tan, J., Wolff, D. B., and Xie, P.: Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission (IMERG), pp. 343–353, Springer International Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-24568-9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_19" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_19</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Inoue et al.(2020)Inoue, Adames, and Yasunaga</label><mixed-citation>Inoue, K., Adames, Á. F., and Yasunaga, K.: Vertical Velocity Profiles in Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves and MJO: New Diagnoses of Vertical Velocity Profiles in the Wavenumber–Frequency Domain, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 2139–2162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0209.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-19-0209.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Jin et al.(2024)Jin, Reeder, Gallant, Parker, and Sprenger</label><mixed-citation>Jin, C., Reeder, M. J., Gallant, A. J. E., Parker, T., and Sprenger, M.: Changes in Weather Systems during Anomalously Wet and Dry Years in Southeastern Australia, J. Climate, 37, 1131–1153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0305.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0305.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kiladis and Wheeler(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Kiladis, G. N. and Wheeler, M.: Horizontal and vertical structure of observed tropospheric equatorial Rossby waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 22981–22997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD02415</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kiladis et al.(2009)Kiladis, Wheeler, Haertel, Straub, and Roundy</label><mixed-citation>Kiladis, G. N., Wheeler, M. C., Haertel, P. T., Straub, K. H., and Roundy, P. E.: Convectively coupled equatorial waves, Rev. Geophys., 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RG000266</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Knapp et al.(2010)Knapp, Kruk, Levinson, Diamond, and Neumann</label><mixed-citation>Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J., and Neumann, C. J.: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying Tropical Cyclone Data, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 363–376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Liebmann et al.(1997)Liebmann, Hendon, and Glick</label><mixed-citation>Liebmann, B., Hendon, H. H., and Glick, J. D.: On the Generation of Two-Day Convective Disturbances Across the Western Equatorial Pacific, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 75, 939–946, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.75.4_939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj1965.75.4_939</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Lubis and Jacobi(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Lubis, S. W. and Jacobi, C.: The modulating influence of convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) on the variability of tropical precipitation, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 1465–1483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4069" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4069</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Madonna et al.(2014)Madonna, Wernli, Joos, and Martius</label><mixed-citation>Madonna, E., Wernli, H., Joos, H., and Martius, O.: Warm Conveyor Belts in the ERA-Interim Dataset (1979–2010). Part I: Climatology and Potential Vorticity Evolution, J. Climate, 27, 3–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00720.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00720.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mapes et al.(2006)Mapes, Tulich, Lin, and Zuidema</label><mixed-citation>Mapes, B., Tulich, S., Lin, J., and Zuidema, P.: The mesoscale convection life cycle: Building block or prototype for large-scale tropical waves?, Dynam. Atmos. Ocean., 42, 3–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2006.03.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2006.03.003</ext-link>,  2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Mapes et al.(2018)Mapes, Chung, Hannah, Masunaga, Wimmers, and Velden</label><mixed-citation>Mapes, B. E., Chung, E. S., Hannah, W. M., Masunaga, H., Wimmers, A. J., and Velden, C. S.: The Meandering Margin of the Meteorological Moist Tropics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1177–1184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076440</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Matsuno(1966)</label><mixed-citation>Matsuno, T.: Quasi-Geostrophic Motions in the Equatorial Area, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 44, 25–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Matthews(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Matthews, A. J.: A vorticity budget for theoretical and convectively coupled equatorial Rossby waves: Dynamical propagation and growth mechanisms, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 151, e4917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4917" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4917</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Mayta and Adames(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Mayta, V. C. and Adames, Á. F.: Moist Thermodynamics of Convectively Coupled Waves over the Western Hemisphere, J. Climate, 36, 2765–2780, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0435.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0435.1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Mayta and Adames Corraliza(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Mayta, V. C. and Adames Corraliza, Á. F.: Is the Madden-Julian Oscillation a Moisture Mode?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL103002</ext-link>,  2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Mayta and Adames Corraliza(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Mayta, V. C. and Adames Corraliza, Á. F.: The Stirring Tropics: The Ubiquity of Moisture Modes and Moisture–Vortex Instability, J. Climate, 37, 1981–1998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0145.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0145.1</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Mayta et al.(2022)Mayta, Adames, and Ahmed</label><mixed-citation>Mayta, V. C., Adames, Á. F., and Ahmed, F.: Westward-Propagating Moisture Mode Over the Tropical Western Hemisphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL097799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097799" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL097799</ext-link>,  2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Monteiro and Sukhatme(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Monteiro, J. M. and Sukhatme, J.: Quasi-geostrophic dynamics in the presence of moisture gradients, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 187–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2644</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Murray and Simmonds(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Murray, R. J. and Simmonds, I.: A numerical scheme for tracking cyclone centres from digital data Part I: development and operation of the scheme, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 39, 155–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ES91020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/ES91020</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Pepler et al.(2021)Pepler, Dowdy, and Hope</label><mixed-citation>Pepler, A. S., Dowdy, A. J., and Hope, P.: The differing role of weather systems in southern Australian rainfall between 1979–1996 and 1997–2015, Clim. Dynam., 56, 2289–2302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05588-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-020-05588-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Prein et al.(2023)Prein, Mooney, and Done</label><mixed-citation>Prein, A. F., Mooney, P. A., and Done, J. M.: The Multi-Scale Interactions of Atmospheric Phenomenon in Mean and Extreme Precipitation, Earth's Future, 11, e2023EF003534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003534" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023EF003534</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Raymond and Fuchs(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Raymond, D. J. and Fuchs, Ž.: Convectively coupled gravity and moisture modes in a simple atmospheric model, Tellus B, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00268.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00268.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Respati(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Respati, M. R.: m-reyhan-respati/trop-wx-sys-characs: trop-wx-sys-characs (Version v1.0),  Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23906712</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Robinson et al.(2024)Robinson, Narsey, and Jakob</label><mixed-citation>Robinson, C. M., Narsey, S., and Jakob, C.: Synoptic Variability in the Tropical Oceanic Moist Margin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2024JD040814, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD040814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD040814</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Schumacher and Rasmussen(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Schumacher, R. S. and Rasmussen, K. L.: The formation, character and changing nature of mesoscale convective systems, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 300–314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0057-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-020-0057-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Si et al.(2021)Si, Liu, Zhang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Si, W., Liu, H., Zhang, X., and Zhang, M.: Double Intertropical Convergence Zones in Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models: Progress in CMIP6, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094779" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL094779</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Sobel and Maloney(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Sobel, A. and Maloney, E.: Moisture Modes and the Eastward Propagation of the MJO, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 187–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0189.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-12-0189.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Sobel and Bretherton(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Sobel, A. H. and Bretherton, C. S.: Modeling Tropical Precipitation in a Single Column, J. Climate, 13, 4378–4392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;4378:MTPIAS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;4378:MTPIAS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Sobel et al.(2001)Sobel, Nilsson, and Polvani</label><mixed-citation>Sobel, A. H., Nilsson, J., and Polvani, L. M.: The Weak Temperature Gradient Approximation and Balanced Tropical Moisture Waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3650–3665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;3650:TWTGAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;3650:TWTGAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Sokolowsky et al.(2024)Sokolowsky, Freeman, Jones, Kukulies, Senf, Marinescu, Heikenfeld, Brunner, Bruning, Collis, Jackson, Leung, Pfeifer, Raut, Saleeby, Stier, and van den Heever</label><mixed-citation>Sokolowsky, G. A., Freeman, S. W., Jones, W. K., Kukulies, J., Senf, F., Marinescu, P. J., Heikenfeld, M., Brunner, K. N., Bruning, E. C., Collis, S. M., Jackson, R. C., Leung, G. R., Pfeifer, N., Raut, B. A., Saleeby, S. M., Stier, P., and van den Heever, S. C.: <italic>tobac</italic> v1.5: introducing fast 3D tracking, splits and mergers, and other enhancements for identifying and analysing meteorological phenomena, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5309–5330, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Sprenger et al.(2017)Sprenger, Fragkoulidis, Binder, Croci-Maspoli, Graf, Grams, Knippertz, Madonna, Schemm, Škerlak, and Wernli</label><mixed-citation>Sprenger, M., Fragkoulidis, G., Binder, H., Croci-Maspoli, M., Graf, P., Grams, C. M., Knippertz, P., Madonna, E., Schemm, S., Škerlak, B., and Wernli, H.: Global Climatologies of Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Features based on ERA-Interim, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1739–1748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Suhas et al.(2022)Suhas, Sukhatme, and Harnik</label><mixed-citation>Suhas, D. L., Sukhatme, J., and Harnik, N.: Dry and moist atmospheric circulation with uniform sea-surface temperature, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 148, 35–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4191" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4191</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Takayabu(1994a)</label><mixed-citation>Takayabu, Y. N.: Large-Scale Cloud Disturbances Associated with Equatorial Waves, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 72, 433–449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_433" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_433</ext-link>, 1994a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Takayabu(1994b)</label><mixed-citation>Takayabu, Y. N.: Large-Scale Cloud Disturbances Associated with Equatorial Waves, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 72, 451–465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_451" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_451</ext-link>, 1994b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Takayabu et al.(1996)Takayabu, Lau, and Sui</label><mixed-citation>Takayabu, Y. N., Lau, K.-M., and Sui, C.-H.: Observation of a Quasi-2-Day Wave during TOGA COARE, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1892–1913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;1892:OOAQDW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;1892:OOAQDW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>tobac Community et al.(2025)tobac Community, Brunner, Freeman, Jones, Kukulies, Senf, Bruning, Stier, van den Heever, Heikenfeld, Marinescu, Collis, Lettl, Pfeifer, Raut, Zhang, and Ziegner</label><mixed-citation>tobac Community, Brunner, K., Freeman, S. W., Jones, W. K., Kukulies, J., Senf, F., Bruning, E., Stier, P., van den Heever, S. C., Heikenfeld, M., Marinescu, P. J., Collis, S. M., Lettl, K., Pfeifer, N., Raut, B. A., Zhang, X., and Ziegner, F.: tobac - Tracking and Object-based Analysis of Clouds, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18012838</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Trenberth et al.(2005)Trenberth, Fasullo, and Smith</label><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J., and Smith, L.: Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor, Clim. Dynam., 24, 741–758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0017-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-005-0017-4</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Tsai et al.(2025)Tsai, Duan, O’Brien, Catto, Ullrich, Zhou, Leung, Feng, Boos, Suhas, Ahmed, and Neelin</label><mixed-citation>Tsai, W.-M., Duan, S., O’Brien, T. A., Catto, J. L., Ullrich, P. A., Zhou, Y., Leung, L. R., Feng, Z., Boos, W. R., Suhas, D. L., Ahmed, F., and Neelin, J. D.: Co-Occurring Atmospheric Features and Their Contributions to Precipitation Extremes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD041687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041687" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD041687</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Utsumi et al.(2017)Utsumi, Kim, Kanae, and Oki</label><mixed-citation>Utsumi, N., Kim, H., Kanae, S., and Oki, T.: Relative contributions of weather systems to mean and extreme global precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 152–167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD025222</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Wang and Sobel(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. and Sobel, A. H.: A Unified Moisture Mode Theory for the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the Boreal Summer Intraseasonal Oscillation, J. Climate, 35, 1267–1291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0361.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0361.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Wernli and Schwierz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Wernli, H. and Schwierz, C.: Surface Cyclones in the ERA-40 Dataset (1958–2001). Part I: Novel Identification Method and Global Climatology, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2486–2507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3766.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3766.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Wernli and Sprenger(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Wernli, H. and Sprenger, M.: Identification and ERA-15 Climatology of Potential Vorticity Streamers and Cutoffs near the Extratropical Tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1569–1586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3912.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Wheeler and Kiladis(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Wheeler, M. and Kiladis, G. N.: Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves: Analysis of Clouds and Temperature in the Wavenumber–Frequency Domain, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0374:CCEWAO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0374:CCEWAO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Zhang(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004RG000158</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Zhang et al.(2020)Zhang, Adames, Khouider, Wang, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, C., Adames, A. F., Khouider, B., Wang, B., and Yang, D.: Four Theories of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000685, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019RG000685</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Zhang and Rossow(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. and Rossow, W. B.: Global Radiative Flux Profile Data Set: Revised and Extended, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037340</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Zhao(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, M.: A Study of AR-, TS-, and MCS-Associated Precipitation and Extreme Precipitation in Present and Warmer Climates, J. Climate, 35, 479–497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0145.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0145.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The moisture mode-to-gravity wave spectrum as a framework to define tropical weather systems</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adames(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adames, Á. F.: The Basic Equations under Weak Temperature Gradient Balance:
Formulation, Scaling, and Types of Convectively Coupled Motions, J.
Atmos. Sci., 79, 2087–2108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0215.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0215.1</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Adames and Kim(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adames, Á. F. and Kim, D.: The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled
Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations, J. Atmos. Sci.,
73, 913–941, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Adames and Maloney(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adames, Á. F. and Maloney, E. D.: Moisture Mode Theory's Contribution to
Advances in our Understanding of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Other
Tropical Disturbances, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 7, 72–85,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00172-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00172-4</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Adames and Ming(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adames, Á. F. and Ming, Y.: Interactions between Water Vapor and Potential
Vorticity in Synoptic-Scale Monsoonal Disturbances: Moisture Vortex
Instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 2083–2106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0310.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0310.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Adames et al.(2019)Adames, Kim, Clark, Ming, and
Inoue</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adames, Á. F., Kim, D., Clark, S. K., Ming, Y., and Inoue, K.: Scale
Analysis of Moist Thermodynamics in a Simple Model and the Relationship
between Moisture Modes and Gravity Waves, J. Atmos.
Sci., 76, 3863–3881, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0121.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0121.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Ahmed(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahmed, F.: The MJO on the Equatorial Beta Plane: An Eastward-Propagating Rossby
Wave Induced by Meridional Moisture Advection, J. Atmos.
Sci., 78, 3115–3135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0071.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0071.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Ahmed and Neelin(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahmed, F. and Neelin, J. D.: Reverse Engineering the Tropical
Precipitation–Buoyancy Relationship, J. Atmos. Sci.,
75, 1587–1608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0333.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0333.1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Aiyyer et al.(2012)Aiyyer, Mekonnen, and Schreck</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aiyyer, A., Mekonnen, A., and Schreck, C. J.: Projection of Tropical Cyclones
on Wavenumber–Frequency-Filtered Equatorial Waves, J. Climate, 25,
3653–3658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00451.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00451.1</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Back and Bretherton(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Back, L. E. and Bretherton, C. S.: Geographic variability in the export of
moist static energy and vertical motion profiles in the tropical Pacific,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026672</a>,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bernardez and Back(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bernardez, M. and Back, L.: Integrating Thermodynamic and Dynamic Views on the
Control of the Top-Heaviness of Convection in the Pacific ITCZ With Weak
Temperature Gradient Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 16, e2022MS003455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003455</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Berry et al.(2011)Berry, Reeder, and Jakob</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berry, G., Reeder, M. J., and Jakob, C.: A global climatology of atmospheric
fronts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046451</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Biswas et al.(2026)Biswas, Sukhatme, and Gayen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Biswas, S., Sukhatme, J., and Gayen, B.: Impact of background conditions on the
structure and propagation of the boreal summer quasi-biweekly oscillation,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,  e70267,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70267</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bolin(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bolin, B.: Numerical Forecasting with the Barotropic Model, Tellus,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8770" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8770</a>, 1955.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Borger et al.(2022)Borger, Beirle, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Borger, C., Beirle, S., and Wagner, T.: Analysis of global trends of total column water vapour from multiple years of OMI observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10603–10621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10603-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10603-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chadwick et al.(2013)Chadwick, Boutle, and
Martin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chadwick, R., Boutle, I., and Martin, G.: Spatial Patterns of Precipitation
Change in CMIP5: Why the Rich Do Not Get Richer in the Tropics, J.
Climate, 26, 3803–3822, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00543.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00543.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Charney(1955)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Charney, J.: The Use of the Primitive Equations of Motion in Numerical
Prediction, Tellus, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8772" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8772</a>, 1955.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Chen and Houze Jr(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, S. S. and Houze Jr, R. A.: Diurnal variation and life-cycle of deep
convective systems over the tropical pacific warm pool, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 357–388,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712353806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712353806</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Chikira(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chikira, M.: Eastward-Propagating Intraseasonal Oscillation Represented by
Chikira–Sugiyama Cumulus Parameterization. Part II: Understanding Moisture
Variation under Weak Temperature Gradient Balance, J. Atmos.
Sci., 71, 615–639, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-038.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-038.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S): Complete ERA5 Global Atmospheric
Reanalysis, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.143582cf</a>,  2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dowdy and Catto(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dowdy, A. J. and Catto, J. L.: Extreme weather caused by concurrent cyclone,
front and thunderstorm occurrences, Sci. Rep., 7, 40359,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40359</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Feng et al.(2023)Feng, Yang, Hodges, and Methven</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, X., Yang, G.-Y., Hodges, K. I., and Methven, J.: Equatorial waves as
useful precursors to tropical cyclone occurrence and intensification, Nat.
Commun., 14, 511, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36055-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36055-5</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Frank and Roundy(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frank, W. M. and Roundy, P. E.: The Role of Tropical Waves in Tropical
Cyclogenesis, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 2397–2417,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3204.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3204.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gonzalez et al.(2023)Gonzalez, Howard, Ferrett, Frame,
Martínez-Alvarado, Methven, and Woolnough</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gonzalez, P. L. M., Howard, E., Ferrett, S., Frame, T. H. A.,
Martínez-Alvarado, O., Methven, J., and Woolnough, S. J.: Weather patterns
in Southeast Asia: Enhancing high-impact weather subseasonal forecast skill,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 149, 19–39,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4378</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Haertel and Kiladis(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haertel, P. T. and Kiladis, G. N.: Dynamics of 2-Day Equatorial Waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2707–2721, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3352.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3352.1</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Heikenfeld et al.(2019)Heikenfeld, Marinescu, Christensen,
Watson-Parris, Senf, van den Heever, and Stier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heikenfeld, M., Marinescu, P. J., Christensen, M., Watson-Parris, D., Senf, F., van den Heever, S. C., and Stier, P.: tobac 1.2: towards a flexible framework for tracking and analysis of clouds in diverse datasets, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4551–4570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4551-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4551-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Hirahara, Horányi,
Muñoz-Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Abdalla,
Abellan, Balsamo, Bechtold, Biavati, Bidlot, Bonavita, De Chiara, Dahlgren,
Dee, Diamantakis, Dragani, Flemming, Forbes, Fuentes, Geer, Haimberger,
Healy, Hogan, Hólm, Janisková, Keeley, Laloyaux, Lopez, Lupu, Radnoti,
de Rosnay, Rozum, Vamborg, Villaume, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons,
A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati,
G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global
reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146,
1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hewson(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hewson, T. D.: Objective fronts, Meteorol. Appl., 5, 37–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482798000553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482798000553</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Huffman et al.(2020)Huffman, Bolvin, Braithwaite, Hsu, Joyce, Kidd,
Nelkin, Sorooshian, Stocker, Tan, Wolff, and Xie</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K.-L., Joyce, R. J., Kidd,
C., Nelkin, E. J., Sorooshian, S., Stocker, E. F., Tan, J., Wolff, D. B., and
Xie, P.: Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation
Measurement (GPM) Mission (IMERG), pp. 343–353, Springer International
Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-24568-9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_19" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_19</a>,
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Inoue et al.(2020)Inoue, Adames, and Yasunaga</label><mixed-citation>
      
Inoue, K., Adames, Á. F., and Yasunaga, K.: Vertical Velocity Profiles in
Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves and MJO: New Diagnoses of Vertical
Velocity Profiles in the Wavenumber–Frequency Domain, J.
Atmos. Sci., 77, 2139–2162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0209.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0209.1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jin et al.(2024)Jin, Reeder, Gallant, Parker, and
Sprenger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, C., Reeder, M. J., Gallant, A. J. E., Parker, T., and Sprenger, M.:
Changes in Weather Systems during Anomalously Wet and Dry Years in
Southeastern Australia, J. Climate, 37, 1131–1153,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0305.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0305.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kiladis and Wheeler(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kiladis, G. N. and Wheeler, M.: Horizontal and vertical structure of observed
tropospheric equatorial Rossby waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 22981–22997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02415</a>,
1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kiladis et al.(2009)Kiladis, Wheeler, Haertel, Straub, and
Roundy</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kiladis, G. N., Wheeler, M. C., Haertel, P. T., Straub, K. H., and Roundy,
P. E.: Convectively coupled equatorial waves, Rev. Geophys., 47,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000266</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Knapp et al.(2010)Knapp, Kruk, Levinson, Diamond, and
Neumann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knapp, K. R., Kruk, M. C., Levinson, D. H., Diamond, H. J., and Neumann, C. J.:
The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS):
Unifying Tropical Cyclone Data, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 91, 363–376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Liebmann et al.(1997)Liebmann, Hendon, and Glick</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liebmann, B., Hendon, H. H., and Glick, J. D.: On the Generation of Two-Day
Convective Disturbances Across the Western Equatorial Pacific, J.
Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 75, 939–946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.75.4_939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.75.4_939</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lubis and Jacobi(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lubis, S. W. and Jacobi, C.: The modulating influence of convectively coupled
equatorial waves (CCEWs) on the variability of tropical precipitation,
Int. J. Climatol., 35, 1465–1483,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4069" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4069</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Madonna et al.(2014)Madonna, Wernli, Joos, and
Martius</label><mixed-citation>
      
Madonna, E., Wernli, H., Joos, H., and Martius, O.: Warm Conveyor Belts in the
ERA-Interim Dataset (1979–2010). Part I: Climatology and Potential
Vorticity Evolution, J. Climate, 27, 3–26,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00720.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00720.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Mapes et al.(2006)Mapes, Tulich, Lin, and Zuidema</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mapes, B., Tulich, S., Lin, J., and Zuidema, P.: The mesoscale convection life
cycle: Building block or prototype for large-scale tropical waves?, Dynam. Atmos. Ocean., 42, 3–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2006.03.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2006.03.003</a>,  2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Mapes et al.(2018)Mapes, Chung, Hannah, Masunaga, Wimmers, and
Velden</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mapes, B. E., Chung, E. S., Hannah, W. M., Masunaga, H., Wimmers, A. J., and
Velden, C. S.: The Meandering Margin of the Meteorological Moist Tropics,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1177–1184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076440</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Matsuno(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsuno, T.: Quasi-Geostrophic Motions in the Equatorial Area, J.
Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 44, 25–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Matthews(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matthews, A. J.: A vorticity budget for theoretical and convectively coupled
equatorial Rossby waves: Dynamical propagation and growth mechanisms,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 151, e4917,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4917" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4917</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mayta and Adames(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayta, V. C. and Adames, Á. F.: Moist Thermodynamics of Convectively
Coupled Waves over the Western Hemisphere, J. Climate, 36, 2765–2780, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0435.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0435.1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mayta and Adames Corraliza(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayta, V. C. and Adames Corraliza, Á. F.: Is the Madden-Julian Oscillation
a Moisture Mode?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103002,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103002</a>,  2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Mayta and Adames Corraliza(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayta, V. C. and Adames Corraliza, Á. F.: The Stirring Tropics: The
Ubiquity of Moisture Modes and Moisture–Vortex Instability, J.
Climate, 37, 1981–1998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0145.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0145.1</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Mayta et al.(2022)Mayta, Adames, and Ahmed</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayta, V. C., Adames, Á. F., and Ahmed, F.: Westward-Propagating Moisture
Mode Over the Tropical Western Hemisphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49,
e2022GL097799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097799" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097799</a>,  2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Monteiro and Sukhatme(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monteiro, J. M. and Sukhatme, J.: Quasi-geostrophic dynamics in the presence of
moisture gradients, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,
142, 187–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2644</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Murray and Simmonds(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murray, R. J. and Simmonds, I.: A numerical scheme for tracking cyclone centres
from digital data Part I: development and operation of the scheme, Aust.
Meteorol. Mag., 39, 155–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/ES91020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/ES91020</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Pepler et al.(2021)Pepler, Dowdy, and Hope</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pepler, A. S., Dowdy, A. J., and Hope, P.: The differing role of weather
systems in southern Australian rainfall between 1979–1996 and 1997–2015,
Clim. Dynam., 56, 2289–2302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05588-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05588-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Prein et al.(2023)Prein, Mooney, and Done</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prein, A. F., Mooney, P. A., and Done, J. M.: The Multi-Scale Interactions of
Atmospheric Phenomenon in Mean and Extreme Precipitation, Earth's Future, 11,
e2023EF003534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003534" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003534</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Raymond and Fuchs(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Raymond, D. J. and Fuchs, Ž.: Convectively coupled gravity and moisture
modes in a simple atmospheric model, Tellus B, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00268.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00268.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Respati(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Respati, M. R.: m-reyhan-respati/trop-wx-sys-characs: trop-wx-sys-characs (Version v1.0),  Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23906712</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Robinson et al.(2024)Robinson, Narsey, and Jakob</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robinson, C. M., Narsey, S., and Jakob, C.: Synoptic Variability in the
Tropical Oceanic Moist Margin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
129, e2024JD040814, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD040814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD040814</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Schumacher and Rasmussen(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schumacher, R. S. and Rasmussen, K. L.: The formation, character and changing
nature of mesoscale convective systems, Nat. Rev. Earth
Environ., 1, 300–314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0057-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0057-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Si et al.(2021)Si, Liu, Zhang, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Si, W., Liu, H., Zhang, X., and Zhang, M.: Double Intertropical Convergence
Zones in Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Models: Progress in CMIP6, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094779,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094779" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094779</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Sobel and Maloney(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sobel, A. and Maloney, E.: Moisture Modes and the Eastward Propagation of the
MJO, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 187–192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0189.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0189.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Sobel and Bretherton(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sobel, A. H. and Bretherton, C. S.: Modeling Tropical Precipitation in a Single
Column, J. Climate, 13, 4378–4392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;4378:MTPIAS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt;4378:MTPIAS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Sobel et al.(2001)Sobel, Nilsson, and Polvani</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sobel, A. H., Nilsson, J., and Polvani, L. M.: The Weak Temperature Gradient
Approximation and Balanced Tropical Moisture Waves, J.
Atmos. Sci., 58, 3650–3665,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;3650:TWTGAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058&lt;3650:TWTGAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Sokolowsky et al.(2024)Sokolowsky, Freeman, Jones, Kukulies, Senf,
Marinescu, Heikenfeld, Brunner, Bruning, Collis, Jackson, Leung, Pfeifer,
Raut, Saleeby, Stier, and van den Heever</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sokolowsky, G. A., Freeman, S. W., Jones, W. K., Kukulies, J., Senf, F., Marinescu, P. J., Heikenfeld, M., Brunner, K. N., Bruning, E. C., Collis, S. M., Jackson, R. C., Leung, G. R., Pfeifer, N., Raut, B. A., Saleeby, S. M., Stier, P., and van den Heever, S. C.: <i>tobac</i> v1.5: introducing fast 3D tracking, splits and mergers, and other enhancements for identifying and analysing meteorological phenomena, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5309–5330, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Sprenger et al.(2017)Sprenger, Fragkoulidis, Binder, Croci-Maspoli,
Graf, Grams, Knippertz, Madonna, Schemm, Škerlak, and
Wernli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sprenger, M., Fragkoulidis, G., Binder, H., Croci-Maspoli, M., Graf, P., Grams,
C. M., Knippertz, P., Madonna, E., Schemm, S., Škerlak, B., and Wernli, H.:
Global Climatologies of Eulerian and Lagrangian Flow Features based on
ERA-Interim, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1739–1748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00299.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Suhas et al.(2022)Suhas, Sukhatme, and Harnik</label><mixed-citation>
      
Suhas, D. L., Sukhatme, J., and Harnik, N.: Dry and moist atmospheric
circulation with uniform sea-surface temperature, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 148, 35–56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4191" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4191</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Takayabu(1994a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takayabu, Y. N.: Large-Scale Cloud Disturbances Associated with Equatorial
Waves, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 72, 433–449,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_433" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_433</a>, 1994a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Takayabu(1994b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takayabu, Y. N.: Large-Scale Cloud Disturbances Associated with Equatorial
Waves, J. Meteorol. Soc. JPN II, 72, 451–465,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_451" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.72.3_451</a>, 1994b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Takayabu et al.(1996)Takayabu, Lau, and Sui</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takayabu, Y. N., Lau, K.-M., and Sui, C.-H.: Observation of a Quasi-2-Day Wave
during TOGA COARE, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1892–1913,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;1892:OOAQDW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124&lt;1892:OOAQDW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>tobac Community et al.(2025)tobac Community, Brunner, Freeman, Jones,
Kukulies, Senf, Bruning, Stier, van den Heever, Heikenfeld, Marinescu,
Collis, Lettl, Pfeifer, Raut, Zhang, and Ziegner</label><mixed-citation>
      
tobac Community, Brunner, K., Freeman, S. W., Jones, W. K., Kukulies, J., Senf,
F., Bruning, E., Stier, P., van den Heever, S. C., Heikenfeld, M., Marinescu,
P. J., Collis, S. M., Lettl, K., Pfeifer, N., Raut, B. A., Zhang, X., and
Ziegner, F.: tobac - Tracking and Object-based Analysis of Clouds, Zenodo,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18012838</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Trenberth et al.(2005)Trenberth, Fasullo, and
Smith</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J., and Smith, L.: Trends and variability in
column-integrated atmospheric water vapor, Clim. Dynam., 24, 741–758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0017-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0017-4</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Tsai et al.(2025)Tsai, Duan, O’Brien, Catto, Ullrich, Zhou, Leung,
Feng, Boos, Suhas, Ahmed, and Neelin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsai, W.-M., Duan, S., O’Brien, T. A., Catto, J. L., Ullrich, P. A., Zhou,
Y., Leung, L. R., Feng, Z., Boos, W. R., Suhas, D. L., Ahmed, F., and Neelin,
J. D.: Co-Occurring Atmospheric Features and Their Contributions to
Precipitation Extremes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130,
e2024JD041687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041687" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041687</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Utsumi et al.(2017)Utsumi, Kim, Kanae, and Oki</label><mixed-citation>
      
Utsumi, N., Kim, H., Kanae, S., and Oki, T.: Relative contributions of weather
systems to mean and extreme global precipitation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 122, 152–167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025222</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Wang and Sobel(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S. and Sobel, A. H.: A Unified Moisture Mode Theory for the
Madden–Julian Oscillation and the Boreal Summer Intraseasonal Oscillation,
J. Climate, 35, 1267–1291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0361.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0361.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Wernli and Schwierz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wernli, H. and Schwierz, C.: Surface Cyclones in the ERA-40 Dataset
(1958–2001). Part I: Novel Identification Method and Global Climatology,
J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2486–2507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3766.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3766.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Wernli and Sprenger(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wernli, H. and Sprenger, M.: Identification and ERA-15 Climatology of Potential
Vorticity Streamers and Cutoffs near the Extratropical Tropopause, J.
Atmos. Sci., 64, 1569–1586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3912.1</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Wheeler and Kiladis(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wheeler, M. and Kiladis, G. N.: Convectively Coupled Equatorial Waves: Analysis
of Clouds and Temperature in the Wavenumber–Frequency Domain, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 374–399,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0374:CCEWAO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0374:CCEWAO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Zhang(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, C.: Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000158</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Zhang et al.(2020)Zhang, Adames, Khouider, Wang, and
Yang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, C., Adames, A. F., Khouider, B., Wang, B., and Yang, D.: Four Theories
of the Madden-Julian Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000685,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000685</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Zhang and Rossow(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y. and Rossow, W. B.: Global Radiative Flux Profile Data Set: Revised
and Extended, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128,
e2022JD037340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037340</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Zhao(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, M.: A Study of AR-, TS-, and MCS-Associated Precipitation and Extreme
Precipitation in Present and Warmer Climates, J. Climate, 35, 479–497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0145.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0145.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
