Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-61-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-61-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
13 Jan 2023
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 13 Jan 2023
| 13 Jan 2023
The role of Rossby waves in polar weather and climate
Tim Woollings
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Camille Li
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Marie Drouard
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Instituto de Geociencias (IGEO), CSIC-UCM, Madrid, Spain
Etienne Dunn-Sigouin
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Karim A. Elmestekawy
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Momme Hell
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
Brian Hoskins
Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Cheikh Mbengue
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Climate Modeling Alliance, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Matthew Patterson
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Thomas Spengler
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Related authors
Hugo Banderier, Alexandre Tuel, Tim Woollings, and Olivia Martius
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-715-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-715-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The jet stream is the main feature of upper-level flow and drives the weather at the surface. It is stronger and better defined in winter and has mostly been studied in that season. However, it is very important for (extreme) weather in summer. In this work, we improve and use two existing and complementary methods to study the jet stream(s) in the Euro-Atlantic sector, with a focus on summer. We find that our methods can verify each other and agree on interesting signals and trends.
Henrik Auestad, Clemens Spensberger, Andrea Marcheggiani, Paulo Ceppi, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Latent heating due to condensation can influence atmospheric circulation by strengthening or weakening horizontal temperature contrasts. Strong temperature contrasts intensify storms and imply the existence of strong upper tropospheric winds called jets. It remains unclear whether latent heating preferentially reinforces or abates the existing jet. We show that this disagreement is attributable to how the jet is defined, confirming that latent heating reinforces the jet.
Kristian Strommen, Tim Woollings, Paolo Davini, Paolo Ruggieri, and Isla R. Simpson
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 853–874, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-853-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-853-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present evidence which strongly suggests that decadal variations in the intensity of the North Atlantic winter jet stream can be predicted by current forecast models but that decadal variations in its position appear to be unpredictable. It is argued that this skill at predicting jet intensity originates from the slow, predictable variability in sea surface temperatures in the sub-polar North Atlantic.
Stephen Outten, Camille Li, Martin P. King, Lingling Suo, Peter Y. F. Siew, Hoffman Cheung, Richard Davy, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Tore Furevik, Shengping He, Erica Madonna, Stefan Sobolowski, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Strong disagreement exists in the scientific community over the role of Arctic sea ice in shaping wintertime Eurasian cooling. The observed Eurasian cooling can arise naturally without sea-ice loss but is expected to be a rare event. We propose a framework that incorporates sea-ice retreat and natural variability as contributing factors. A helpful analogy is of a dice roll that may result in cooling, warming, or anything in between, with sea-ice loss acting to load the dice in favour of cooling.
Lisa-Ann Kautz, Olivia Martius, Stephan Pfahl, Joaquim G. Pinto, Alexandre M. Ramos, Pedro M. Sousa, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 305–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric blocking is associated with stationary, self-sustaining and long-lasting high-pressure systems. They can cause or at least influence surface weather extremes, such as heat waves, cold spells, heavy precipitation events, droughts or wind extremes. The location of the blocking determines where and what type of extreme event will occur. These relationships are also important for weather prediction and may change due to global warming.
Andrea Marcheggiani and Thomas Spengler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3855, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
Cold air outbreaks, where cold polar air flows over warmer oceans, help restore midlatitude atmospheric temperature gradients near strong ocean currents, supporting storm formation. Using a novel method, we show that moderate outbreaks cover less than 15 % of the Gulf Stream region but explain up to 40 % of near-surface variability. In the North Pacific, they are more extensive and still account for a large share of variability, highlighting their key role in shaping storm tracks.
Hugo Banderier, Alexandre Tuel, Tim Woollings, and Olivia Martius
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 715–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-715-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-715-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The jet stream is the main feature of upper-level flow and drives the weather at the surface. It is stronger and better defined in winter and has mostly been studied in that season. However, it is very important for (extreme) weather in summer. In this work, we improve and use two existing and complementary methods to study the jet stream(s) in the Euro-Atlantic sector, with a focus on summer. We find that our methods can verify each other and agree on interesting signals and trends.
Clemens Spensberger, Kjersti Konstali, and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 431–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-431-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-431-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The transport of moisture from warmer and moister to colder and drier regions mainly occurs in brief and narrow bursts. In the mid-latitudes, such bursts are generally referred to as atmospheric rivers; in the Arctic they are often referred to as warm moist intrusions. We introduce a new definition to identify such bursts which is based primarily on their elongated structure. With this more general definition, we show that bursts in moisture transport occur frequently across all climate zones.
Lise Seland Graff, Jerry Tjiputra, Ada Gjermundsen, Andreas Born, Jens Boldingh Debernard, Heiko Goelzer, Yan-Chun He, Petra Margaretha Langebroek, Aleksi Nummelin, Dirk Olivié, Øyvind Seland, Trude Storelvmo, Mats Bentsen, Chuncheng Guo, Andrea Rosendahl, Dandan Tao, Thomas Toniazzo, Camille Li, Stephen Outten, and Michael Schulz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-472, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-472, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The magnitude of future Arctic amplification is highly uncertain. Using the Norwegian Earth system model, we explore the effect of improving the representation of clouds, ocean eddies, the Greenland ice sheet, sea ice, and ozone on the projected Arctic winter warming in a coordinated experiment set. These improvements all lead to enhanced projected Arctic warming, with the largest changes found in the sea-ice retreat regions and the largest uncertainty on the Atlantic side.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Chris Weijenborg and Thomas Spengler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3404, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3404, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The swift succession of storms, referred to as cyclone clustering, is often associated with weather extremes. We introduce a detection scheme for these events and subdivide these into two types. One type is associated with storms that follow each other in space, whereas the other type requires a proximity over time. Cyclone clustering is more frequent during winter and the first type is associated with stronger storms, suggesting that the two types emerge due to different mechanisms.
Henrik Auestad, Clemens Spensberger, Andrea Marcheggiani, Paulo Ceppi, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Latent heating due to condensation can influence atmospheric circulation by strengthening or weakening horizontal temperature contrasts. Strong temperature contrasts intensify storms and imply the existence of strong upper tropospheric winds called jets. It remains unclear whether latent heating preferentially reinforces or abates the existing jet. We show that this disagreement is attributable to how the jet is defined, confirming that latent heating reinforces the jet.
Fumiaki Ogawa and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1031–1042, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of energy and moisture between the atmosphere and ocean is maximised along strong meridional contrasts in sea surface temperature, such as across the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio. We find that these strong meridional contrasts confine and determine the position of evaporation and precipitation, as well as storm occurrence and intensity. The general intensity of the water cycle and storm activity, however, is determined by the underlying absolute sea surface temperature.
Peter Yu Feng Siew, Camille Li, Stefan Pieter Sobolowski, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, and Mingfang Ting
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 985–996, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-985-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-985-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The atmospheric circulation response to surface heating at various latitudes was investigated within an idealized framework. We confirm previous results on the importance of temperature advection for balancing heating at lower latitudes. Further poleward, transient eddies become increasingly important, and eventually radiative cooling also contributes. This promotes amplified surface warming for high-latitude heating and has implications for links between sea ice loss and polar amplification.
Momme C. Hell and Christopher Horvat
The Cryosphere, 18, 341–361, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice is heavily impacted by waves on its margins, and we currently do not have routine observations of waves in sea ice. Here we propose two methods to separate the surface waves from the sea-ice height observations along each ICESat-2 track using machine learning. Both methods together allow us to follow changes in the wave height through the sea ice.
Christiane Duscha, Juraj Pálenik, Thomas Spengler, and Joachim Reuder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5103–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5103-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5103-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We combine observations from two scanning Doppler lidars to obtain new and unique insights into the dynamic processes inherent to atmospheric convection. The approach complements and enhances conventional methods to probe convection and has the potential to substantially deepen our understanding of this complex process, which is crucial to improving our weather and climate models.
Andrea Marcheggiani and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 927–942, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
There is a gap between the theoretical understanding and model representation of moist diabatic effects on the evolution of storm tracks. We seek to bridge this gap by exploring the relationship between diabatic and adiabatic contributions to changes in baroclinicity. We find reversed behaviours in the lower and upper troposphere in the maintenance of baroclinicity. In particular, our study reveals a link between higher moisture availability and upper-tropospheric restoration of baroclinicity.
Kristian Strommen, Tim Woollings, Paolo Davini, Paolo Ruggieri, and Isla R. Simpson
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 853–874, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-853-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-853-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present evidence which strongly suggests that decadal variations in the intensity of the North Atlantic winter jet stream can be predicted by current forecast models but that decadal variations in its position appear to be unpredictable. It is argued that this skill at predicting jet intensity originates from the slow, predictable variability in sea surface temperatures in the sub-polar North Atlantic.
Bjørg Risebrobakken, Mari F. Jensen, Helene R. Langehaug, Tor Eldevik, Anne Britt Sandø, Camille Li, Andreas Born, Erin Louise McClymont, Ulrich Salzmann, and Stijn De Schepper
Clim. Past, 19, 1101–1123, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1101-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1101-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the observational period, spatially coherent sea surface temperatures characterize the northern North Atlantic at multidecadal timescales. We show that spatially non-coherent temperature patterns are seen both in further projections and a past warm climate period with a CO2 level comparable to the future low-emission scenario. Buoyancy forcing is shown to be important for northern North Atlantic temperature patterns.
Stephen Outten, Camille Li, Martin P. King, Lingling Suo, Peter Y. F. Siew, Hoffman Cheung, Richard Davy, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Tore Furevik, Shengping He, Erica Madonna, Stefan Sobolowski, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Strong disagreement exists in the scientific community over the role of Arctic sea ice in shaping wintertime Eurasian cooling. The observed Eurasian cooling can arise naturally without sea-ice loss but is expected to be a rare event. We propose a framework that incorporates sea-ice retreat and natural variability as contributing factors. A helpful analogy is of a dice roll that may result in cooling, warming, or anything in between, with sea-ice loss acting to load the dice in favour of cooling.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Clemens Spensberger, Trond Thorsteinsson, and Thomas Spengler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2711–2729, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2711-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2711-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In order to understand the atmosphere, we rely on a hierarchy of models ranging from very simple to very complex. Comparing different steps in this hierarchy usually entails comparing different models. Here we combine two such steps that are commonly used in one modelling framework. This makes comparisons both much easier and much more direct.
Lisa-Ann Kautz, Olivia Martius, Stephan Pfahl, Joaquim G. Pinto, Alexandre M. Ramos, Pedro M. Sousa, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 305–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-305-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric blocking is associated with stationary, self-sustaining and long-lasting high-pressure systems. They can cause or at least influence surface weather extremes, such as heat waves, cold spells, heavy precipitation events, droughts or wind extremes. The location of the blocking determines where and what type of extreme event will occur. These relationships are also important for weather prediction and may change due to global warming.
Clio Michel, Erica Madonna, Clemens Spensberger, Camille Li, and Stephen Outten
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1131–1148, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1131-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1131-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models still struggle to correctly represent blocking frequency over the North Atlantic–European domain. This study makes use of five large ensembles of climate simulations and the ERA-Interim reanalyses to investigate the Greenland blocking frequency and one of its drivers, namely cyclonic Rossby wave breaking. We particularly try to understand the discrepancies between two specific models, out of the five, that behave differently.
Leonidas Tsopouridis, Thomas Spengler, and Clemens Spensberger
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 953–970, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-953-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-953-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing simulations with realistic and smoothed SSTs, we find that the intensification of individual cyclones in the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio regions is only marginally affected by reducing the SST gradient. In contrast, we observe a reduced cyclone activity and a shift in storm tracks. Considering differences of the variables occurring within/outside of a radius of any cyclone, we find cyclones to play only a secondary role in explaining the mean states differences among the SST experiments.
Erica Madonna, David S. Battisti, Camille Li, and Rachel H. White
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 777–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-777-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-777-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The amount of precipitation over Europe varies substantially from year to year, with impacts on crop yields and energy production. In this study, we show that it is possible to infer much of the winter precipitation and temperature signal over Europe by knowing only the frequency of occurrence of certain atmospheric circulation patterns. The results highlight the importance of (daily) weather for understanding and interpreting seasonal signals.
Martin P. King, Camille Li, and Stefan Sobolowski
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 759–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-759-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-759-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We re-examine the uncertainty of ENSO teleconnection to the North Atlantic by considering the November–December and January–February months in the cold season, in addition to the conventional DJF months. This is motivated by previous studies reporting varying teleconnected atmospheric anomalies and the mechanisms concerned. Our results indicate an improved confidence in the patterns of the teleconnection. The finding may also have implications on research in predictability and climate impact.
Kristine Flacké Haualand and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 695–712, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-695-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-695-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Given the recent focus on the influence of upper tropospheric structure in wind and temperature on midlatitude weather, we use an idealised model to investigate how structural modifications impact cyclone development. We find that cyclone intensification is less sensitive to these modifications than to changes in the amount of cloud condensation, suggesting that an accurate representation of the upper-level troposphere is less important for midlatitude weather than previously anticipated.
Patrick Johannes Stoll, Thomas Spengler, Annick Terpstra, and Rune Grand Graversen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 19–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-19-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-19-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Polar lows are intense meso-scale cyclones occurring at high latitudes. The research community has not agreed on a conceptual model to describe polar-low development. Here, we apply self-organising maps to identify the typical ambient sub-synoptic environments of polar lows and find that they can be described as moist-baroclinic cyclones that develop in four different environments characterised by the vertical wind shear.
Cited articles
Aizawa, T. and Tanaka, H.: Axisymmetric structure of the long lasting summer Arctic cyclones, Polar Sci., 10, 192–198,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2016.02.002, 2016. a
Ambaum, M. H.: Unimodality of wave amplitude in the Northern Hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1077–1086, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2298.1, 2008. a
Ambrizzi, T. and Hoskins, B. J.: Stationary Rossby-wave propagation in a
baroclinic atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 919–928, 1997. a
Andrews, D. and Mcintyre, M. E.: Planetary waves in horizontal and vertical
shear: The generalized Eliassen-Palm relation and the mean zonal
acceleration, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 2031–2048,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2031:PWIHAV>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a
Barnes, E. A. and Hartmann, D. L.: Rossby Wave Scales, Propagation, and the
Variability of Eddy-Driven Jets, J. Atmos. Sci., 68,
2893–2908, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-039.1, 2011. a, b
Barnes, E. A. and Hartmann, D. L.: The global distribution of atmospheric eddy length scales, J. Climate, 25, 3409–3416, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00331.1, 2012. a
Barnes, E. A. and Simpson, I. R.: Seasonal sensitivity of the Northern Hemisphere jet streams to Arctic temperatures on subseasonal time scales, J. Climate, 30, 10117–10137, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0299.1, 2017. a
Barriopedro, D., García-Herrera, R., Lupo, A. R., and Hernández, E.: A climatology of Northern Hemisphere blocking, J. Climate, 19,
1042–1063, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3678.1, 2006. a
Barsugli, J. J. and Battisti, D. S.: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 477–493,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0477:TBEOAO>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Blackmon, M. L.: A Climatological Spectral Study of the 500 mb Geopotential Height of the Northern Hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 33,
1607–1623, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1607:ACSSOT>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a
Blackmon, M. L., Lee, Y., and Wallace, J. M.: Horizontal structure of 500 mb height fluctuations with long, intermediate and short time scales, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 961–980, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<0961:HSOMHF>2.0.CO;2, 1984. a
Blackport, R. and Screen, J. A.: Insignificant effect of Arctic amplification
on the amplitude of midlatitude atmospheric waves, Sci. Adv., 6,
eaay2880, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2880, 2020. a
Boer, G. J. and Shepherd, T.: Large-scale two-dimensional turbulence in the atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 164–184,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0164:LSTDTI>2.0.CO;2, 1983. a, b
Branstator, G. and Held, I.: Westward propagating normal modes in the presence of stationary background waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 52,
247–262, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0247:WPNMIT>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Cavallo, S. M. and Hakim, G. J.: Composite structure of tropopause polar
cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 3840–3857,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3371.1, 2010. a, b
Chang, E. K.: Downstream development of baroclinic waves as inferred from
regression analysis, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2038–2053,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2038:DDOBWA>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Chang, E. K. and Orlanski, I.: On the dynamics of a storm track, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 999–1015, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<0999:OTDOAS>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a, b
Chang, E. K. and Yu, D. B.: Characteristics of wave packets in the upper troposphere. Part I: Northern Hemisphere winter, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1708–1728, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1708:COWPIT>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b
Charney, J. G.: Geostrophic turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci.,
28, 1087–1095, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<1087:GT>2.0.CO;2, 1971. a
Cohen, J., Screen, J. A., Furtado, J. C., Barlow, M., Whittleston, D., Coumou, D., Francis, J., Dethloff, K., Entekhabi, D., Overland, J., and Jones, J.: Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather, Nat. Geosci., 7, 627–637, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2234, 2014. a
Cohen, J., Zhang, X., Francis, J., Jung, T., Kwok, R., Overland, J., Ballinger, T., Bhatt, U., Chen, H., Coumou, D., Feldstein, S., Gu, H., Handorf, D., Henderson, G., Ionita, M., Kretschmer, M., Laliberte, F., Lee, S., Linderholm, H. W., Maslowski, W., Peings, Y., Pfeiffer, K., Rigor, I., Semmler, T., Stroeve, J., Taylor, P. C., Vavrus, S. Vihma, T., Wang, S., Wendisch, M., Wu, Y, and Yoon, J.: Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather, Nat. Clim.
Change, 10, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0662-y, 2019. a
Curry, J.: The contribution of radiative cooling to the formation of cold-core anticyclones, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2575–2592,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2575:TCORCT>2.0.CO;2, 1987. a
Day, J. J. and Hodges, K. I.: Growing land-sea temperature contrast and the
intensification of Arctic cyclones, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
3673–3681, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077587, 2018. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011 (data available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era-interim, last access: 12 January 2023). a
Deser, C., Tomas, R., Alexander, M., and Lawrence, D.: The Seasonal
Atmospheric Response to Projected Arctic Sea Ice Loss in the Late
Twenty-First Century, J. Climate, 23, 333–351,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3053.1, 2010. a
Ding, Q., Wallace, J. M., Battisti, D. S., Steig, E. J., Gallant, A. J., Kim,
H.-J., and Geng, L.: Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming in
northeastern Canada and Greenland, Nature, 509, 209–212,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13260, 2014. a
Dunn-Sigouin, E.: Materials for Woollings et al. 2022, “The role of Rossby waves in polar weather and climate”, GitHub [data, code],
https://github.com/edunnsigouin/w22wcd (last access: 12 January 2023), 2022. a
Dunn-Sigouin, E.: Materials for my contribution to “The role of Rossby waves in polar weather and climate” (v1.0.0), Zenodo [data, code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7528248, 2023. a
Dunn-Sigouin, E. and Shaw, T. A.: Comparing and contrasting extreme
stratospheric events, including their coupling to the tropospheric
circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 1374–1390,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022116, 2015. a
Dunn-Sigouin, E., Li, C., and Kushner, P. J.: Limited Influence of Localized
Tropical Sea-Surface Temperatures on Moisture Transport into the Arctic,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091540, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091540, 2021. a
Fragkoulidis, G. and Wirth, V.: Local Rossby Wave Packet Amplitude, Phase Speed, and Group Velocity: Seasonal Variability and Their Role in Temperature
Extremes, J. Climate, 33, 8767–8787, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0377.1,
2020. a
Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking Arctic amplification to
extreme weather in mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000, 2012. a
Franzke, C., Lee, S., and Feldstein, S. B.: Is the North Atlantic
Oscillation a breaking wave?, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 145–160, 2004. a
Gabriel, A. and Peters, D.: A diagnostic study of different types of Rossby
wave breaking events in the northern extratropics, J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn.,
86, 613–631, 2008. a
Gerber, E. P. and Thompson, D. W.: What makes an annular mode “annular”?,
J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 317–332, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0191.1, 2017. a, b
Gong, T., Feldstein, S. B., and Lee, S.: Rossby Wave Propagation from the Arctic into the Midlatitudes: Does It Arise from In Situ Latent Heating or a
Trans-Arctic Wave Train?, J. Climate, 33, 3619–3633,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0780.1, 2020. a
Graversen, R. G. and Burtu, M.: Arctic amplification enhanced by latent energy transport of atmospheric planetary waves, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 2046–2054, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2802, 2016. a
Hanna, E., Fettweis, X., Mernild, S. H., Cappelen, J., Ribergaard, M. H.,
Shuman, C. A., Steffen, K., Wood, L., and Mote, T. L.: Atmospheric and
oceanic climate forcing of the exceptional Greenland ice sheet surface melt
in summer 2012, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 1022–1037,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3743, 2014. a
Harlander, U.: A high-latitude quasi-geostrophic delta plane model derived from spherical geometry, Tellus A, 57, 43–54, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v57i1.14601, 2005. a, b
He, S., Xu, X., Furevik, T., and Gao, Y.: Eurasian Cooling Linked to the
Vertical Distribution of Arctic Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2020GL087212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087212, 2020. a
Hell, M. C., Schneider, T., and Li, C.: Atmospheric circulation response to short-term Arctic warming in an idealized model, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 531–549, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0133.1, 2020. a, b
Hendon, H. H. and Hartmann, D. L.: Stationary waves on a sphere: Sensitivity to thermal feedback, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1906–1920,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<1906:SWOASS>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Hendon, H. H. and Hartmann, D. L.: Variability in a nonlinear model of the atmosphere with zonally symmetric forcing, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2783–2797,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<2783:VIANMO>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a
Honda, M., Inoue, J., and Yamane, S.: Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL037079, 2009. a, b, c
Hoskins, B. and Hodges, K.: The annual cycle of Northern Hemisphere storm
tracks. Part I: Seasons, J. Climate, 32, 1743–1760,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0870.1, 2019. a
Hoskins, B. and Woollings, T.: Persistent extratropical regimes and climate
extremes, Current Climate Change Reports, 1, 115–124,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0020-8, 2015. a, b
Hoskins, B. J. and Ambrizzi, T.: Rossby Wave Propagation on a Realistic
Longitudinally Varying Flow., J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1661–1671,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1661:RWPOAR>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a, b
Hoskins, B. J. and Hodges, K. I.: New perspectives on the northern hemisphere
winter storm tracks, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1041–1061,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1041:NPOTNH>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Hoskins, B. J. and Karoly, D. J.: The steady linear response of a spherical atmosphere to thermal and orographic forcing, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 1179–1196,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<1179:TSLROA>2.0.CO;2, 1981. a, b, c
Inoue, J., Hori, M. E., and Takaya, K.: The role of Barents Sea ice in the
wintertime cyclone track and emergence of a warm-Arctic cold-Siberian
anomaly, J. Climate, 25, 2561–2568, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00449.1,
2012. a
Jung, T., Kasper, M. A., Semmler, T., and Serrar, S.: Arctic influence on
subseasonal midlatitude prediction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
3676–3680, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059961, 2014. a
Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1631–1643, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631, 2002 (data available at: https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/index.html, last access: 12 January 2023). a
Karoly, D.: Rossby wave propagation in a barotropic atmosphere, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 7, 111–125, 1983. a
Kelleher, M. and Screen, J.: Atmospheric precursors of and response to anomalous Arctic sea ice in CMIP5 models, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 27–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7039-9, 2018. a
Kidston, J. and Vallis, G. K.: The Relationship between the Speed and the Latitude of an Eddy-Driven Jet in a Stirred Barotropic Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3251–3263, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0300.1, 2012. a
Kim, B.-M., Son, S.-W., Min, S.-K., Jeong, J.-H., Kim, S.-J., Zhang, X., Shim, T., and Yoon, J.-H.: Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by Arctic sea-ice loss, Nat. Commun., 5, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5646, 2014. a
Kim, D., Kang, S. M., Merlis, T. M., and Shin, Y.: Atmospheric circulation
sensitivity to changes in the vertical structure of polar warming,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094726, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094726,
2021. a
Kolstad, E. W., Bracegirdle, T. J., and Seierstad, I. A.: Marine cold-air outbreaks in the North Atlantic: Temporal distribution and associations with
large-scale atmospheric circulation, Clim. Dynam., 33, 187–197,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0431-5, 2009. a
Kornhuber, K., Petoukhov, V., Petri, S., Rahmstorf, S., and Coumou, D.: Evidence for wave resonance as a key mechanism for generating high-amplitude
quasi-stationary waves in boreal summer, Clim. Dynam., 49, 1961–1979,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3399-6, 2017. a
Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F., and Runge, J.: Using causal effect networks to analyze different Arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation, J. Climate, 29, 4069–4081, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0654.1, 2016. a
Kushnir, Y.: Retrograding wintertime low-frequency disturbances over the
North Pacific Ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2727–2742, 1987. a
Lee, S.: A theory for polar amplification from a general circulation
perspective, Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 31–43,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0024-7, 2014. a
Li, R. K., Woollings, T., O'Reilly, C., and Scaife, A. A.: Effect of the North Pacific Tropospheric Waveguide on the Fidelity of Model El Niño
Teleconnections, J. Climate, 33, 5223–5237,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0156.1, 2020. a
Luxford, F. and Woollings, T.: A simple kinematic source of skewness in atmospheric flow fields, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 578–590,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-089.1, 2012. a
Madonna, E., Hes, G., Li, C., Michel, C., and Siew, P. Y. F.: Control of Barents Sea Wintertime Cyclone Variability by Large-Scale Atmospheric Flow,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090322, 2020. a
Mann, M. E., Rahmstorf, S., Kornhuber, K., Steinman, B. A., Miller, S. K., and Coumou, D.: Influence of anthropogenic climate change on planetary wave
resonance and extreme weather events, Sci. Rep., 7, 45242,
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45242, 2017. a
McIntyre, M. E. and Palmer, T. N.: Breaking planetary waves in the
stratosphere, Nature, 305, 593–600, 1983. a
Messori, G., Woods, C., and Caballero, R.: On the drivers of wintertime
temperature extremes in the high Arctic, J. Climate, 31, 1597–1618,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0386.1, 2018. a
Methven, J. and Berrisford, P.: The slowly evolving background state of the
atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 2237–2258, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2518, 2015. a
Mori, M., Kosaka, Y., Watanabe, M., Nakamura, H., and Kimoto, M.: A reconciled estimate of the influence of Arctic sea-ice loss on recent Eurasian cooling, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 123–129, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0379-3, 2019. a
Nakamura, N. and Huang, C. S.: Atmospheric blocking as a traffic jam in the jet stream, Science, 361, 42–47, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat0721, 2018. a
Nakamura, N. and Zhu, D.: Finite-amplitude wave activity and diffusive flux of potential vorticity in eddy–mean flow interaction, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2701–2716, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3432.1, 2010. a
Nof, D.: Modons and monopoles on a γ-plane, Geophys. Astro. Fluid, 52, 71–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/03091929008219840, 1990. a
O'Reilly, C., Woollings, T., Zanna, L., and Weisheimer, A.: The impact of
tropical precipitation on summertime Euro-Atlantic circulation via a
circumglobal wave train, J. Climate, 31, 6481–6504,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0451.1, 2018. a
Outten, S., Li, C., King, M. P., Suo, L., Siew, P. Y. F., Davy, R., Dunn-Sigouin, E., He, S., Cheung, H., Madonna, E., Furevik, T., Sobolowski, S., Spengler, T., and Woollings, T.: Reconciling conflicting evidence for the cause of the observed early 21st century Eurasian cooling, Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-32, in review, 2022. a
Overland, J., Francis, J. A., Hall, R., Hanna, E., Kim, S.-J., and Vihma, T.:
The melting Arctic and midlatitude weather patterns: Are they connected?,
J. Climate, 28, 7917–7932, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00822.1, 2015. a
Overland, J. E. and Wang, M.: Large-scale atmospheric circulation changes are
associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice, Tellus A, 62, 1–9, 2010. a
Overland, J. E. and Wang, M.: Resolving future Arctic/midlatitude weather
connections, Earths Future, 6, 1146–1152, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000901, 2018. a
Overland, J. E. and Wang, M.: The 2020 Siberian heat wave, Int. J. Climatol., 41, E2341–E2346, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6850, 2021. a, b
Papritz, L.: Arctic lower-tropospheric warm and cold extremes: Horizontal and
vertical transport, diabatic processes, and linkage to synoptic circulation
features, J. Climate, 33, 993–1016, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0638.1,
2020. a
Patterson, M., Woollings, T., Bracegirdle, T. J., and Lewis, N. T.: Wintertime Southern Hemisphere jet streams shaped by interaction of transient eddies with Antarctic orography, J. Climate, 33, 10505–10522,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0153.1, 2020. a, b
Potter, S. F., Spengler, T., and Held, I. M.: Reflection of barotropic Rossby waves in sheared flow and validity of the WKB approximation,
J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2170–2178, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0315.1, 2013. a
Randel, W. J. and Held, I. M.: Phase speed spectra of transient eddy fluxes and critical layer absorption, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 688–697,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0688:PSSOTE>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Rennert, K. J. and Wallace, J. M.: Cross-Frequency Coupling, Skewness, and Blocking in the Northern Hemisphere Winter Circulation, J. Climate, 22,
5650–5666, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2669.1, 2009. a
Rhines, P. B.: Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane, J. Fluid Mech., 69, 417–443, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001504, 1975. a
Rossby, C.-G.: Relation between variations in the intensity of the zonal
circulation of the atmosphere and the displacements of the semi-permanent
centers of action, J. Mar. Res., 2, 38–55, 1939. a
Rousi, E., Kornhuber, K., Beobide-Arsuaga, G., Luo, F., and Coumou, D.: Accelerated western European heatwave trends linked to more-persistent double jets over Eurasia, Nat. Commun., 13, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31432-y, 2022. a
Sardeshmukh, P. D. and Hoskins, B. J.: The generation of global rotational flow by steady idealized tropical divergence, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 1228–1251, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<1228:TGOGRF>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Sato, K., Inoue, J., and Watanabe, M.: Influence of the Gulf Stream on the Barents Sea ice retreat and Eurasian coldness during early winter, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 084009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/084009, 2014. a
Screen, J. A., Bracegirdle, T. J., and Simmonds, I.: Polar climate change as
manifest in atmospheric circulation, Current Climate Change Reports, 4,
383–395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0111-4, 2018. a
Sellevold, R., Sobolowski, S., and Li, C.: Investigating possible
Arctic–midlatitude teleconnections in a linear framework, J. Climate, 29, 7329–7343, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0902.1, 2016. a, b, c
Serreze, M. C. and Barrett, A. P.: The summer cyclone maximum over the central Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 21, 1048–1065,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1810.1, 2008. a
Serreze, M. C., Kahl, J. D., and Schnell, R. C.: Low-level temperature
inversions of the Eurasian Arctic and comparisons with Soviet drifting
station data, J. Climate, 5, 615–629,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<0615:LLTIOT>2.0.CO;2, 1992. a
Serreze, M. C., Lynch, A. H., and Clark, M. P.: The Arctic frontal zone as seen in the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, J. Climate, 14, 1550–1567,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1550:TAFZAS>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Siew, P. Y. F., Li, C., Sobolowski, S. P., and King, M. P.: Intermittency of Arctic–mid-latitude teleconnections: stratospheric pathway between autumn sea ice and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 261–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-261-2020, 2020. a
Simmonds, I. and Rudeva, I.: The great Arctic cyclone of August 2012,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L23709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054259, 2012. a
Simmons, A. J. and Hoskins, B. J.: The downstream and upstream development of unstable baroclinic waves, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1239–1254, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1239:TDAUDO>2.0.CO;2, 1979. a
Sorokina, S. A., Li, C., Wettstein, J. J., and Kvamstø, N. G.: Observed
atmospheric coupling between Barents Sea ice and the warm-Arctic
cold-Siberian anomaly pattern, J. Climate, 29, 495–511,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0046.1, 2016. a
Sorteberg, A. and Walsh, J. E.: Seasonal cyclone variability at 70 N and its
impact on moisture transport into the Arctic, Tellus A, 60, 570–586, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00314.x, 2008. a
Spengler, T. and Smith, R. K.: The dynamics of heat lows over flat terrain,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2157–2172, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.342, 2008. a
Spensberger, C., Reeder, M. J., Spengler, T., and Patterson, M.: The connection between the southern annular mode and a feature-based perspective on Southern Hemisphere midlatitude winter variability, J. Climate, 33, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0224.1, 2020. a
Strong, C. and Magnusdottir, G.: Tropospheric Rossby wave breaking and the NAO/NAM, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 2861–2876, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2632.1, 2008. a
Sukoriansky, S., Dikovskaya, N., and Galperin, B.: On the arrest of inverse energy cascade and the Rhines scale, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3312–3327, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4013.1, 2007. a
Takaya, K. and Nakamura, H.: A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 608–627,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0608:AFOAPI>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Thompson, D. W. J. and Wallace, J. M.: Annular modes in the extratropical
circulation. Part I: Month-to-month variability, J. Climate, 13,
1000–1016, 2000. a
Vallis, G. K.: Atmospheric and oceanic fluid dynamics, Cambridge University
Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107588417, 2006. a, b, c
Vallis, G. K. and Maltrud, M. E.: Generation of mean flows and jets on a beta plane and over topography, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 23, 1346–1362,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<1346:GOMFAJ>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Vallis, G. K., Gerber, E. P., Kushner, P. J., and Cash, B. A.: A Mechanism and Simple Dynamical Model of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Annular Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 264–280,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0264:AMASDM>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b, c
Vessey, A. F., Hodges, K. I., Shaffrey, L. C., and Day, J. J.: The composite development and structure of intense synoptic-scale Arctic cyclones, Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1097–1112, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1097-2022, 2022. a
Walsh, J. E., Bromwich, D. H., Overland, J., Serreze, M. C., and Wood, K. R. : 100 years of progress in polar meteorology, Meteor. Mon., 59, 21–1, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0003.1, 2018. a
Wernli, H. and Papritz, L.: Role of polar anticyclones and mid-latitude cyclones for Arctic summertime sea-ice melting, Nat. Geosci., 11, 108–113, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0041-0, 2018. a
Wirth, V.: Waveguidability of idealized midlatitude jets and the limitations of ray tracing theory, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 111–125, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-111-2020, 2020. a, b
Wirth, V., Riemer, M., Chang, E. K., and Martius, O.: Rossby wave packets on
the midlatitude waveguide – A review, Mon. Weather Rev., 146,
1965–2001, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0483.1, 2018. a, b
Wolf, G. and Wirth, V.: Implications of the semigeostrophic nature of Rossby
waves for Rossby wave packet detection, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 26–38,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00120.1, 2015. a
Woods, C., Caballero, R., and Svensson, G.: Large-scale circulation associated with moisture intrusions into the Arctic during winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4717–4721, 2013. a
Woollings, T. J., Hoskins, B. J., Blackburn, M., and Berrisford, P.: A new
Rossby wave-breaking interpretation of the North Atlantic
Oscillation, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 609–626, 2008. a
Xie, Y., Wu, G., Liu, Y., and Huang, J.: Eurasian cooling linked with Arctic
warming: Insights from PV dynamics, J. Climate, 33, 2627–2644,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0073.1, 2020. a
Yamagami, A., Matsueda, M., and Tanaka, H. L.: Extreme arctic cyclone in August 2016, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 18, 307–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.757, 2017. a
Yang, G.-Y. and Hoskins, B. J.: Propagation of Rossby waves of nonzero frequency, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2365–2378,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2365:PORWON>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
a, b
Yang, H.: Evolution of a Rossby wave packet in barotropic flows with asymmetric basic current, topography and δ-effect, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 2267–2276, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2267:EOARWP>2.0.CO;2, 1987. a
Yang, H.: Global behavior of the evolution of a Rossby wave packet in barotropic flows on the earth's δ-surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 133–146, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<0133:GBOTEO>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Zappa, G., Pithan, F., and Shepherd, T. G.: Multimodel evidence for an
atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the CMIP5 future
projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1011–1019,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076096, 2018. a
Executive editor
The paper by Tim Woollings et al. provides first a theoretical summary of the role of Rossby wave dynamics for polar variability, regarding the large-scale polar flow conceptually as a superposition of geostrophic turbulence and Rossby wave propagation, emphasising the key role of isolated vortices at high latitudes. In a second part, the paper addresses how comparatively weak Rossby waves can be triggered from high latitudes in the presence of a relative vorticity gradient as a direct response to sea ice loss, which often manifests as a heat low. The paper provides a well written and much needed foundation for an active area of research.
The paper by Tim Woollings et al. provides first a theoretical summary of the role of Rossby...
Short summary
This paper investigates large-scale atmospheric variability in polar regions, specifically the balance between large-scale turbulence and Rossby wave activity. The polar regions are relatively more dominated by turbulence than lower latitudes, but Rossby waves are found to play a role and can even be triggered from high latitudes under certain conditions. Features such as cyclone lifetimes, high-latitude blocks, and annular modes are discussed from this perspective.
This paper investigates large-scale atmospheric variability in polar regions, specifically the...
