Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-767-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-767-2026
Research article
 | 
12 May 2026
Research article |  | 12 May 2026

A spread-versus-error framework to reliably quantify the potential for subseasonal windows of forecast opportunity

Philip Rupp, Jonas Spaeth, and Thomas Birner

Viewed

Total article views: 3,482 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,165 1,112 205 3,482 312 164 171
  • HTML: 2,165
  • PDF: 1,112
  • XML: 205
  • Total: 3,482
  • Supplement: 312
  • BibTeX: 164
  • EndNote: 171
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,482 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,462 with geography defined and 20 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 12 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Weather forecasts several weeks ahead are uncertain, but this uncertainty itself can change depending on large-scale atmospheric conditions. We present a new way to measure how well forecasts capture these changes in uncertainty. Our results show that reliability of uncertainty varies strongly with region and is linked to slow, predictable patterns in the atmosphere. These findings help identify periods when forecasts are more trustworthy.
Share