Articles | Volume 6, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025
Research article
 | 
07 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 07 Feb 2025

A process-based evaluation of biases in extratropical stratosphere–troposphere coupling in subseasonal forecast systems

Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu

Related authors

Seasonality of the Quasi-biennial Oscillation signal in water vapor in the tropical stratosphere
Qian Lu, Jian Rao, Chunhua Shi, and Chaim I. Garfinkel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1123,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1123, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
A Python diagnostics package for evaluation of MJO-Teleconnections in S2S forecast systems
Cristiana Stan, Saisri Kollapaneni, Andrea Jenney, Jiabao Wang, Zheng Wu, Cheng Zheng, Hyemi Kim, Chaim Garfinkel, and Ayush Singh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1142,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1142, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Assessing stratospheric contributions to subseasonal predictions of precipitation after the 2018 SSW from SNAPSI
Ying Dai, Peter Hitchcock, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, and William J. M. Seviour
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-484,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-484, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying stratospheric biases and identifying their potential sources in subseasonal forecast systems
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Stratospheric Nudging And Predictable Surface Impacts (SNAPSI): a protocol for investigating the role of stratospheric polar vortex disturbances in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
Peter Hitchcock, Amy Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tim Stockdale, James Anstey, Dann Mitchell, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Daniele Mastrangelo, Piero Malguzzi, Hai Lin, Ryan Muncaster, Bill Merryfield, Michael Sigmond, Baoqiang Xiang, Liwei Jia, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Jiyoung Oh, Damien Specq, Isla R. Simpson, Jadwiga H. Richter, Cory Barton, Jeff Knight, Eun-Pa Lim, and Harry Hendon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5073–5092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric teleconnections incl. stratosphere–troposphere coupling
The role of the Indian Ocean Dipole in modulating the austral spring ENSO teleconnection to the Southern Hemisphere
Luciano Gustavo Andrian, Marisol Osman, and Carolina Susana Vera
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1505–1522, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamics of stratospheric wave reflection over the North Pacific
Michael K. Schutte, Alice Portal, Simon H. Lee, and Gabriele Messori
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2240,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2240, 2024
Short summary
Model spread in multidecadal North Atlantic Oscillation variability connected to stratosphere–troposphere coupling
Rémy Bonnet, Christine M. McKenna, and Amanda C. Maycock
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 913–926, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Opposite spectral properties of Rossby waves during weak and strong stratospheric polar vortex events
Michael Schutte, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and Jacopo Riboldi
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 733–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-733-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-733-2024, 2024
Short summary
Stratospheric influence on the winter North Atlantic storm track in subseasonal reforecasts
Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Dominik Büeler, C. Ole Wulff, Michael Sprenger, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 231–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-231-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-231-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Afargan-Gerstman, H., Jiménez-Esteve, B., and Domeisen, D. I. V.: On the relative importance of stratospheric and tropospheric drivers for the North Atlantic jet response to sudden stratospheric warming events, J. Climate, 35, 6453–6467, 2022. a
Andrews, D. G., Leovy, C. B., and Holton, J. R.: Middle Atmosphere Dynamics, Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-08-051167-2, 1987. a
Ayarzagüena, B., Palmeiro, F. M., Barriopedro, D., Calvo, N., Langematz, U., and Shibata, K.: On the representation of major stratospheric warmings in reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9469–9484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9469-2019, 2019. a
Baldwin, M. P. and Thompson, D. W.: A critical comparison ofstratosphere–troposphere coupling indices, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1661–1672, 2009. a
Baldwin, M. P., Ayarzagüena, B., Birner, T., Butchart, N., Butler, A. H.,Charlton-Perez, A. J., Domeisen, D. I., Garfinkel, C. I., Garny, H., Gerber, E. P., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden stratospheric warmings, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000708, 2021.​​​​​​​ a
Download
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Share