Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-45-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-45-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Sudden stratospheric warmings during El Niño and La Niña: sensitivity to atmospheric model biases
Nicholas L. Tyrrell
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Meteorological Research Unit, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki,
00500, Finland
Juho M. Koskentausta
Meteorological Research Unit, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki,
00500, Finland
Alexey Yu. Karpechko
Meteorological Research Unit, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki,
00500, Finland
Related authors
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Nicholas L. Tyrrell and Alexey Yu. Karpechko
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 913–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures (El Niño) affect the global climate. The Pacific-to-Europe connection relies on interactions of large atmospheric waves with winds and surface pressure. We looked at how mean errors in a climate model affect its ability to simulate the Pacific-to-Europe connection. We found that even large errors in the seasonal winds did not affect the response of the model to an El Niño event, which is good news for seasonal forecasts which rely on these connections.
Alexey Yu. Karpechko, Amy H. Butler, and Frederic Vitart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the knowledge of future tropical and stratospheric conditions could improve forecasts in winter remotely, via teleconnections, 3–6 weeks ahead. We find that the tropics improve forecasts of sea level pressure in subtropics, Europe, and North America. The stratosphere improves forecasts in high latitudes and Europe. Improvements are small for temperature and precipitation. Larger forecast ensembles than usually available for research are needed to predict teleconnection signals.
Tereza Uhlíková, Timo Vihma, Alexey Yu Karpechko, and Petteri Uotila
The Cryosphere, 19, 1031–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1031-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1031-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand the local, regional, and global impacts of the recent rapid sea-ice decline in the Arctic, one of the key issues is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration on the surface radiative fluxes. We analyse these effects utilising four data sets called atmospheric reanalyses, and we evaluate uncertainties in these effects arising from inter-reanalysis differences in the sensitivity of the surface radiative fluxes to sea-ice concentration.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Xavier J. Levine, Ryan S. Williams, Gareth Marshall, Andrew Orr, Lise Seland Graff, Dörthe Handorf, Alexey Karpechko, Raphael Köhler, René R. Wijngaard, Nadine Johnston, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, and Priscilla A. Mooney
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1161–1177, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
While the most recent climate projections agree that the Arctic is warming, differences remain in how much and in other climate variables such as precipitation. This presents a challenge for stakeholders who need to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies. We tackle this problem by using the storyline approach to generate four plausible and actionable realisations of end-of-century climate change for the Arctic, spanning its most likely range of variability.
Tereza Uhlíková, Timo Vihma, Alexey Yu Karpechko, and Petteri Uotila
The Cryosphere, 18, 957–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-957-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-957-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the sensible and latent heat fluxes in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising four data sets called atmospheric reanalyses, and we evaluate uncertainties in these effects arising from inter-reanalysis differences in SIC and in the sensitivity of the latent and sensible heat fluxes to SIC.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Adam A. Scaife, Mark P. Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Eun-Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok-Woo Son, and David W. J. Thompson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2601–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Nicholas L. Tyrrell and Alexey Yu. Karpechko
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 913–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures (El Niño) affect the global climate. The Pacific-to-Europe connection relies on interactions of large atmospheric waves with winds and surface pressure. We looked at how mean errors in a climate model affect its ability to simulate the Pacific-to-Europe connection. We found that even large errors in the seasonal winds did not affect the response of the model to an El Niño event, which is good news for seasonal forecasts which rely on these connections.
Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, and Heikki J. Järvinen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we investigate the role of the tropospheric forcing in the occurrence of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) that took place in February 2018, its predictability and teleconnection with the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by analysing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble forecast. The purpose of the paper is to present the results of the analysis of the atmospheric circulation before and during the SSW and clarify the driving mechanisms.
Cited articles
Baldwin, M. P., Stephenson, D. B., Thompson, D. W., Dunkerton, T. J., Charlton, A. J., and O'Neill, A.: Stratospheric memory and skill of extended‐range weather forecasts, Science, 301, 5633, 636–640, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087143, 2003.
Bayr, T., Latif, M., Dommenget, D., Wengel, C., Harlaß, J., and Park,
W.: Mean-state dependence of ENSO atmospheric
feedbacks in climate models, Clim. Dynam., 50, 3171–3194,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3799-2, 2018.
Bayr, T., Domeisen, D. I. V., and Wengel, C.: The effect of the equatorial
Pacific cold SST bias on simulated ENSO teleconnections to the North Pacific
and California, Clim. Dynam., 53, 3771–3789, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04746-9,
2019.
Bell, C. J., Gray, L. J., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Joshi, M. M., and Scaife,
A. A.: Stratospheric communication of El Niño tele-
connections to European winter, J. Climate, 22, 4083–4096,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2717.1, 2009.
Butler, A. H., Polvani, L. M., and Deser, C.: Separating the stratospheric
and tropospheric pathways of El Niño–Southern
Oscillation teleconnections, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 024015,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014, 2014.
Butler, A. H., Sjoberg, J. P., Seidel, D. J., and Rosenlof, K. H.: A sudden stratospheric warming compendium, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 63–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-63-2017, 2017.
Cagnazzo, C. and Manzini, E.: Impact of the stratosphere on the winter
tropospheric teleconnections between ENSO and the
North Atlantic and European region, J. Climate, 22, 1223–1238,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2549.1, 2009.
Charlton, A. J. and Polvani, L. M.,: A new look at stratospheric sudden
warmings. Part I: Climatology and modeling benchmarks, J. Climate, 20,
449–469, 2007.
Dawson, A., Matthews, A. J., and Stevens, D. P.: Rossby wave dynamics of the
North Pacific extra-tropical response to El Niño: Importance of the
basic state in coupled GCMs, Clim. Dynam., 37, 391–405, 2011.
Domeisen, D. I., Garfinkel, C. I., and Butler, A. H.: The teleconnection of
El Niño Southern Oscillation to the stratosphere, Rev. Geophys., 57,
5–47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000596, 2019.
Eichinger, R., Garny, H., Šácha, P., Danker, J., Dietmüller, S.,
and Oberländer-Hayn, S.: Effects of missing gravity waves on
stratospheric dynamics; part 1: climatology, Clim. Dynam., 54,
3165–3183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05166-w, 2020.
Frauen, C., Dommenget, D., Tyrrell, N. L., Rezny, M., and Wales, S.: Analysis of the Nonlinearity of El Niño–Southern Oscillation Teleconnections, J. Climate, 27, 6225–6244, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00757.1, 2014.
Garfinkel, C. I. and Hartmann, D. L.: Different ENSO teleconnections and
their effects on the stratospheric polar vortex, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D18114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009920, 2008.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6, 2018.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater,
J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C.,
Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot,
J., Bonavita, M., Dahlgren, P., De Chiara, G., Dee, D. P., Diamantakis, M.,
Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger,
L., Healy, S. B., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E. V., Janisková, M., Keeley,
S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum,
I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global
reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hoerling, M. P., Kumar, A., and Zhong, M.: El Niño, La Niña, and the
nonlinearity of their teleconnections, J. Climate, 10, 1769–1786,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1769:ENOLNA>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Iza, M., Calvo, N., and Manzini, E.: The stratospheric pathway of La
Niña, J. Climate, 29, 8899–8914, 2016.
Jiménez-Esteve, B. and Domeisen, D. I. V.: Nonlinearity in the North
Pacific atmospheric response to a linear ENSO forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
46, 2271–2281, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081226, 2019.
Karpechko, A. Yu., Tyrrell, N. L., and Rast, S.: Sensitivity of QBO
teleconnection to model circulation biases, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147,
2147–2159, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4014, 2021.
Kharin, V. V. and Scinocca, J. F.: The impact of model fidelity on seasonal
predictive skill, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18803,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052815, 2012.
Larkin, N. K. and Harrison, D. E.: ENSO warm (El Niño) and cold (La
Niña) event life cycles: Ocean surface anomaly pat- terns, their
symmetries, asymmetries, and implications, J. Climate, 15, 1118–1140,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1118:EWENOA>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Li, R. K., Woollings, T., O'Reilly, C., and Scaife, A. A.: Effect of the
North Pacific tropospheric waveguide on the fidelity of model El Niño
teleconnections, J. Climate, 33, 5223–5237, 2020.
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie: Availability & Licenses,
available at: https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/availability-licenses,
last access: 13 January 2020.
Met Office Hadley Centre: Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature
data set (HadISST), Met Office Hadley Centre [data set], available at:
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst/, last access: 13 January 2020.
Polvani, L. M., Sun, L., Butler, A. H., Richter, J. H., and Deser, C.:
Distinguishing stratospheric sudden warmings from ENSO as key drivers of
wintertime climate variability over the North Atlantic and Eurasia, J.
Climate, 30, 1959–1969, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0277.1, 2017.
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670, 2003.
Song, K. and Son, S.-W.: Revisiting the ENSO–SSW relationship, J. Climate,
31, 2133–2143, 2018.
Stevens, B., Giorgetta, M., Esch, M., Mauritsen, T., Crueger, T., Rast, S.,
Salzmann, M., Schmidt, H., Bader, J., Block, K., and Brokopf, R.:
Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth system model: ECHAM6, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 5, 146–172, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20015, 2013.
Trascasa-Castro, P., Maycock, A. C., Yiu, Y. Y. S., and Fletcher, J. K.: On
the linearity of the stratospheric and Euro-Atlantic sector response to
ENSO, J. Climate, 32, 6607–6626, 2019.
Tyrrell, N. and Karpechko, A. Yu.: ECHAM6 Bias Correction ENSO, figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13311623.v2, 2020.
Tyrrell, N. L. and Karpechko, A. Yu.: Minimal impact of model biases on Northern Hemisphere El Niño–Southern Oscillation teleconnections, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 913–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, 2021.
Tyrrell, N. L., Dommenget, D., Frauen, C., Wales, S., and Rezny, M.: The
influence of global sea surface temperature variability on the
largescale land surface temperature, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2159–2176,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2332-0, 2015.
Tyrrell, N. L., Karpechko, A. Y., and Rast, S.: Siberian snow forcing in a
dynamically bias–corrected model, J. Climate, 33, 10455–10467,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0966.1, 2020.
Short summary
El Niño events are known to effect the variability of the wintertime stratospheric polar vortex. The observed relationship differs from what is seen in climate models. Climate models have errors in their average winds and temperature, and in this work we artificially reduce those errors to see how that changes the communication of El Niño events to the polar stratosphere. We find reducing errors improves stratospheric variability, but does not explain the differences with observations.
El Niño events are known to effect the variability of the wintertime stratospheric polar...