Articles | Volume 3, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022
Research article
 | 
19 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 19 Aug 2022

Quantifying stratospheric biases and identifying their potential sources in subseasonal forecast systems

Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irina Statnaia, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu

Related authors

Reanalysis intercomparison of potential vorticity and potential-vorticity-based diagnostics
Luis F. Millán, Gloria L. Manney, and Zachary D. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5355–5376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Reanalysis intercomparisons of stratospheric polar processing diagnostics
Zachary D. Lawrence, Gloria L. Manney, and Krzysztof Wargan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13547–13579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018, 2018
Short summary
Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
Gloria L. Manney, Michaela I. Hegglin, Zachary D. Lawrence, Krzysztof Wargan, Luis F. Millán, Michael J. Schwartz, Michelle L. Santee, Alyn Lambert, Steven Pawson, Brian W. Knosp, Ryan A. Fuller, and William H. Daffer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11541–11566, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11541-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11541-2017, 2017
Short summary
The major stratospheric final warming in 2016: dispersal of vortex air and termination of Arctic chemical ozone loss
Gloria L. Manney and Zachary D. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15371–15396, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016, 2016
Short summary
Polar processing in a split vortex: Arctic ozone loss in early winter 2012/2013
G. L. Manney, Z. D. Lawrence, M. L. Santee, N. J. Livesey, A. Lambert, and M. C. Pitts
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5381–5403, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5381-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5381-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric teleconnections incl. stratosphere–troposphere coupling
Using large ensembles to quantify the impact of sudden stratospheric warmings and their precursors on the North Atlantic Oscillation
Philip E. Bett, Adam A. Scaife, Steven C. Hardiman, Hazel E. Thornton, Xiaocen Shen, Lin Wang, and Bo Pang
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 213–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023, 2023
Short summary
The stratosphere: a review of the dynamics and variability
Neal Butchart
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1237–1272, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1237-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1237-2022, 2022
Short summary
Stratospheric downward wave reflection events modulate North American weather regimes and cold spells
Gabriele Messori, Marlene Kretschmer, Simon H. Lee, and Vivien Wendt
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1215–1236, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1215-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1215-2022, 2022
Short summary
Modulation of the El Niño teleconnection to the North Atlantic by the tropical North Atlantic during boreal spring and summer
Jake W. Casselman, Bernat Jiménez-Esteve, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1077–1096, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1077-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1077-2022, 2022
Short summary
Stratospheric modulation of Arctic Oscillation extremes as represented by extended-range ensemble forecasts
Jonas Spaeth and Thomas Birner
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 883–903, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-883-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-883-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Afargan-Gerstman, H. and Domeisen, D. I. V.: Pacific Modulation of the North Atlantic Storm Track Response to Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085007, 2020. a
Ambaum, M. H. P. and Hoskins, B. J.: The NAO Troposphere–Stratosphere Connection, J. Climate, 15, 1969–1978, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1969:TNTSC>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Andrews, D. G., Leovy, C. B., and Holton, J. R.: Middle Atmosphere Dynamics, Academic Press, ISBN 9780120585762, 1987. a, b
Anstey, J. A. and Shepherd, T. G.: High-Latitude Influence of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2132, 2014. a, b
Anstey, J. A., Simpson, I. R., Richter, J. H., Naoe, H., Taguchi, M., Serva, F., Gray, L. J., Butchart, N., Hamilton, K., Osprey, S., Bellprat, O., Braesicke, P., Bushell, A. C., Cagnazzo, C., Chen, C.-C., Chun, H.-Y., Garcia, R. R., Holt, L., Kawatani, Y., Kerzenmacher, T., Kim, Y.-H., Lott, F., McLandress, C., Scinocca, J., Stockdale, T. N., Versick, S., Watanabe, S., Yoshida, K., and Yukimoto, S.: Teleconnections of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in a Multi-Model Ensemble of QBO-resolving Models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 1568–1592, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4048, 2022. a, b
Download
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.