Articles | Volume 2, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-581-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-581-2021
Research article
 | 
12 Jul 2021
Research article |  | 12 Jul 2021

An unsupervised learning approach to identifying blocking events: the case of European summer

Carl Thomas, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Gerald Lim, Joanna Haigh, and Peer Nowack

Related authors

Opinion: Why all emergent constraints are wrong but some are useful – a machine learning perspective
Peer Nowack and Duncan Watson-Parris
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1636,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1636, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
A global behavioural model of human fire use and management: WHAM! v1.0
Oliver Perkins, Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathy Smith, Jay Mistry, and James D. A. Millington
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3993–4016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3993-2024, 2024
Short summary
INFERNO-peat v1.0.0: a representation of northern high-latitude peat fires in the JULES-INFERNO global fire model
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
Stephanie Fiedler, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Christopher J. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Ryan J. Kramer, Toshihiko Takemura, Robert J. Allen, Ulas Im, Matthew Kasoar, Angshuman Modak, Steven Turnock, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Duncan Watson-Parris, Daniel M. Westervelt, Laura J. Wilcox, Alcide Zhao, William J. Collins, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2387–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
A systematic evaluation of high-cloud controlling factors
Sarah Wilson Kemsley, Paulo Ceppi, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Philip Stier, and Peer Nowack
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-226,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-226, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Dynamical processes in midlatitudes
Deepening mechanisms of cut-off lows in the Southern Hemisphere and the role of jet streams: insights from eddy kinetic energy analysis
Henri Rossi Pinheiro, Kevin Ivan Hodges, and Manoel Alonso Gan
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 881–894, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-881-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-881-2024, 2024
Short summary
Large-scale perspective on extreme near-surface winds in the central North Atlantic
Aleksa Stanković, Gabriele Messori, Joaquim G. Pinto, and Rodrigo Caballero
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 821–837, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-821-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-821-2024, 2024
Short summary
Divergent convective outflow in ICON deep-convection-permitting and parameterised deep convection simulations
Edward Groot, Patrick Kuntze, Annette Miltenberger, and Holger Tost
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 779–803, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-779-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-779-2024, 2024
Short summary
Changes in the North Atlantic Oscillation over the 20th century
Stephen Outten and Richard Davy
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 753–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-753-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-753-2024, 2024
Short summary
Life cycle dynamics of Greenland blocking from a potential vorticity perspective
Seraphine Hauser, Franziska Teubler, Michael Riemer, Peter Knippertz, and Christian M. Grams
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 633–658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-633-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-633-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barnes, E. A.: Revisiting the evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4734–4739, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50880, 2013. a
Barnes, E. A. and Polvani, L. M.: CMIP5 Projections of Arctic Amplification, of the North American/North Atlantic Circulation, and of Their Relationship, J. Climate, 28, 5254–5271, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00589.1, 2015. a
Barnes, E. A. and Screen, J. A.: The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet-stream: Can it? Has it? Will it?, WIREs Clim. Change, 6, 277–286, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.337, 2015. a
Barnes, E. A., Dunn-Sigouin, E., Masato, G., and Woollings, T.: Exploring recent trends in Northern Hemisphere blocking, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 638–644, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058745, 2014. a, b
Barriopedro, D., García-Herrera, R., and Trigo, R.: Application of blocking diagnosis methods to General Circulation Models. Part I: A novel detection scheme, Clim. Dynam., 35, 1373–1391, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0767-5, 2010. a, b, c, d
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric blocking events are complex large-scale weather patterns which block the path of the jet stream. They are associated with heat waves in summer and cold snaps in winter. Blocking is poorly understood, and the effect of climate change is not clear. Here, we present a new method to study blocking using unsupervised machine learning. We show that this method performs better than previous methods used. These results show the potential for unsupervised learning in atmospheric science.