Articles | Volume 2, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-695-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-695-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Relative importance of tropopause structure and diabatic heating for baroclinic instability
Kristine Flacké Haualand
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Thomas Spengler
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
Andrea Marcheggiani and Thomas Spengler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3855, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
Cold air outbreaks, where cold polar air flows over warmer oceans, help restore midlatitude atmospheric temperature gradients near strong ocean currents, supporting storm formation. Using a novel method, we show that moderate outbreaks cover less than 15 % of the Gulf Stream region but explain up to 40 % of near-surface variability. In the North Pacific, they are more extensive and still account for a large share of variability, highlighting their key role in shaping storm tracks.
Clemens Spensberger, Kjersti Konstali, and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 431–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-431-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-431-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The transport of moisture from warmer and moister to colder and drier regions mainly occurs in brief and narrow bursts. In the mid-latitudes, such bursts are generally referred to as atmospheric rivers; in the Arctic they are often referred to as warm moist intrusions. We introduce a new definition to identify such bursts which is based primarily on their elongated structure. With this more general definition, we show that bursts in moisture transport occur frequently across all climate zones.
Chris Weijenborg and Thomas Spengler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3404, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3404, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The swift succession of storms, referred to as cyclone clustering, is often associated with weather extremes. We introduce a detection scheme for these events and subdivide these into two types. One type is associated with storms that follow each other in space, whereas the other type requires a proximity over time. Cyclone clustering is more frequent during winter and the first type is associated with stronger storms, suggesting that the two types emerge due to different mechanisms.
Henrik Auestad, Clemens Spensberger, Andrea Marcheggiani, Paulo Ceppi, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1269–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1269-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Latent heating due to condensation can influence atmospheric circulation by strengthening or weakening horizontal temperature contrasts. Strong temperature contrasts intensify storms and imply the existence of strong upper tropospheric winds called jets. It remains unclear whether latent heating preferentially reinforces or abates the existing jet. We show that this disagreement is attributable to how the jet is defined, confirming that latent heating reinforces the jet.
Fumiaki Ogawa and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1031–1042, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The exchange of energy and moisture between the atmosphere and ocean is maximised along strong meridional contrasts in sea surface temperature, such as across the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio. We find that these strong meridional contrasts confine and determine the position of evaporation and precipitation, as well as storm occurrence and intensity. The general intensity of the water cycle and storm activity, however, is determined by the underlying absolute sea surface temperature.
Christiane Duscha, Juraj Pálenik, Thomas Spengler, and Joachim Reuder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5103–5123, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5103-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5103-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We combine observations from two scanning Doppler lidars to obtain new and unique insights into the dynamic processes inherent to atmospheric convection. The approach complements and enhances conventional methods to probe convection and has the potential to substantially deepen our understanding of this complex process, which is crucial to improving our weather and climate models.
Andrea Marcheggiani and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 927–942, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
There is a gap between the theoretical understanding and model representation of moist diabatic effects on the evolution of storm tracks. We seek to bridge this gap by exploring the relationship between diabatic and adiabatic contributions to changes in baroclinicity. We find reversed behaviours in the lower and upper troposphere in the maintenance of baroclinicity. In particular, our study reveals a link between higher moisture availability and upper-tropospheric restoration of baroclinicity.
Stephen Outten, Camille Li, Martin P. King, Lingling Suo, Peter Y. F. Siew, Hoffman Cheung, Richard Davy, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Tore Furevik, Shengping He, Erica Madonna, Stefan Sobolowski, Thomas Spengler, and Tim Woollings
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 95–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-95-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Strong disagreement exists in the scientific community over the role of Arctic sea ice in shaping wintertime Eurasian cooling. The observed Eurasian cooling can arise naturally without sea-ice loss but is expected to be a rare event. We propose a framework that incorporates sea-ice retreat and natural variability as contributing factors. A helpful analogy is of a dice roll that may result in cooling, warming, or anything in between, with sea-ice loss acting to load the dice in favour of cooling.
Tim Woollings, Camille Li, Marie Drouard, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Karim A. Elmestekawy, Momme Hell, Brian Hoskins, Cheikh Mbengue, Matthew Patterson, and Thomas Spengler
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 61–80, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-61-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-61-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates large-scale atmospheric variability in polar regions, specifically the balance between large-scale turbulence and Rossby wave activity. The polar regions are relatively more dominated by turbulence than lower latitudes, but Rossby waves are found to play a role and can even be triggered from high latitudes under certain conditions. Features such as cyclone lifetimes, high-latitude blocks, and annular modes are discussed from this perspective.
Clemens Spensberger, Trond Thorsteinsson, and Thomas Spengler
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2711–2729, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2711-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2711-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In order to understand the atmosphere, we rely on a hierarchy of models ranging from very simple to very complex. Comparing different steps in this hierarchy usually entails comparing different models. Here we combine two such steps that are commonly used in one modelling framework. This makes comparisons both much easier and much more direct.
Leonidas Tsopouridis, Thomas Spengler, and Clemens Spensberger
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 953–970, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-953-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-953-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Comparing simulations with realistic and smoothed SSTs, we find that the intensification of individual cyclones in the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio regions is only marginally affected by reducing the SST gradient. In contrast, we observe a reduced cyclone activity and a shift in storm tracks. Considering differences of the variables occurring within/outside of a radius of any cyclone, we find cyclones to play only a secondary role in explaining the mean states differences among the SST experiments.
Patrick Johannes Stoll, Thomas Spengler, Annick Terpstra, and Rune Grand Graversen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 19–36, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-19-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-19-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Polar lows are intense meso-scale cyclones occurring at high latitudes. The research community has not agreed on a conceptual model to describe polar-low development. Here, we apply self-organising maps to identify the typical ambient sub-synoptic environments of polar lows and find that they can be described as moist-baroclinic cyclones that develop in four different environments characterised by the vertical wind shear.
Cited articles
Asselin, O., Bartello, P., and Straub, D. N.: On quasigeostrophic dynamics near
the tropopause, Phys. Fluids, 28, 026601, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941761, 2016. a
Balasubramanian, G. and Yau, M.: The life cycle of a simulated marine cyclone:
Energetics and PV diagnostics, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 639–653,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0639:TLCOAS>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous
weather regimes, Science, 294, 581–584, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063315, 2001. a
Beare, R. J., Thorpe, A. J., and White, A. A.: The predictability of
extratropical cyclones: Nonlinear sensitivity to localized
potential-vorticity perturbations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129,
219–237, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.15, 2003. a
Birner, T.: Fine-scale structure of the extratropical tropopause region, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, D04104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006301, 2006. a, b
Birner, T., Dörnbrack, A., and Schumann, U.: How sharp is the tropopause at
midlatitudes?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1700, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015142,
2002. a
Birner, T., Sankey, D., and Shepherd, T.: The tropopause inversion layer in
models and analyses, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L14804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026549,
2006. a, b, c, d
Blumen, W.: On short-wave baroclinic instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 36,
1925–1933, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1925:OSWBI>2.0.CO;2, 1979. a, b, c, d
Bretherton, F. P.: Baroclinic instability and the short wavelength cut-off in
terms of potential instability, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 92, 335–345,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709239303, 1966. a, b
Butler, A. H., Arribas, A., Athanassiadou, M., Baehr, J., Calvo, N.,
Charlton-Perez, A., Déqué, M., Domeisen, D. I., Fröhlich, K.,
Hendon, H., Imada, Y., Ishii, M., Iza, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Kumar, A., MacLachlan, C., Merryfield, W. J., Müller, W. A., O'Neill, A., Scaife, A. A., Scinocca, J., Sigmond, M., Stockdale, T. N., and Yasuda, T.: The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: do
stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in
boreal winter?, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142,
1413–1427, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2743, 2016. a
Charlton-Perez, A. J., Baldwin, M. P., Birner, T., Black, R. X., Butler, A. H.,
Calvo, N., Davis, N. A., Gerber, E. P., Gillett, N., Hardiman, S., Kim, J., Krüger, K., Lee, Y.-Y., Manzini, E., McDaniel, B. A., Polvani, L., Reichler, T., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Son, S.-W., Toohey, M., Wilcox, L., Yoden, S., Christiansen, B., Lott, F., Shindell, D., Yukimoto, S., and Watanabe, S.: On
the lack of stratospheric dynamical variability in low-top versions of the
CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2494–2505, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50125,
2013. a
Charney, J. G.: The dynamics of long waves in a baroclinic westerly current, J.
Meteorol., 4, 135–162, 1947. a
Charron, M.: The Stratospheric Extension of the Canadian Global Deterministic
Medium-Range Weather Forecasting System and Its Impact on Tropospheric
Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 1924–1944, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00097.1,
2012. a
Craig, G. and Cho, H.-R.: Cumulus heating and CISK in the extratropical
atmosphere. Part I: Polar lows and comma clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 45,
2622–2640, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<2622:CHACIT>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
de Vries, H., Methven, J., Frame, T. H., and Hoskins, B. J.: Baroclinic waves
with parameterized effects of moisture interpreted using Rossby wave
components, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2766–2784, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3410.1,
2010. a
Dirren, S., Didone, M., and Davies, H. C.: Diagnosis of forecast-analysis
differences of a weather prediction system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30,
2060–2063, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017986, 2003. a
Egger, J.: Tropopause height in baroclinic channel flow, J. Atmos. Sci., 52,
2232–2241, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<2232:THIBCF>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Emanuel, K. A., Fantini, M., and Thorpe, A. J.: Baroclinic instability in an
environment of small stability to slantwise moist convection. Part I:
Two-dimensional models, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1559–1573,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1559:BIIAEO>2.0.CO;2, 1987. a
Gettelman, A. and Wang, T.: Structural diagnostics of the tropopause inversion
layer and its evolution, J. Geophys. Re.-Atmos., 120,
46–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021846, 2015. a, b
Gray, S. L., Dunning, C. M., Methven, J., Masato, G., and Chagnon, J. M.:
Systematic model forecast error in Rossby wave structure, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 41, 2979–2987, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059282, 2014. a, b, c
Grise, K. M., Thompson, D. W., and Birner, T.: A global survey of static
stability in the stratosphere and upper troposphere, J. Climate, 23,
2275–2292, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3369.1, 2010. a, b
Hakim, G. J.: Vertical structure of midlatitude analysis and forecast errors,
Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 567–578, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-2882.1, 2005. a, b, c
Hamill, T. M., Snyder, C., and Whitaker, J. S.: Ensemble Forecasts and the
Properties of Flow-Dependent Analysis-Error Covariance Singular Vectors, Mon.
Weather Rev., 131, 1741–1758, https://doi.org/10.1175//2559.1, 2003. a
Hardiman, S., Butchart, N., Hinton, T., Osprey, S., and Gray, L.: The effect of
a well-resolved stratosphere on surface climate: Differences between CMIP5
simulations with high and low top versions of the Met Office climate model,
J. Climate, 25, 7083–7099, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00579.1, 2012. a
Harnik, N. and Lindzen, R. S.: The effect of basic-state potential vorticity
gradients on the growth of baroclinic waves and the height of the tropopause,
J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 344–360,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0344:TEOBSP>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Haualand, K. F.: Moist Eady model including a tropopause (Version v1.0.3), Zenodo [model code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5101474, 2021. a
Haualand, K. F. and Spengler, T.: Direct and Indirect Effects of Surface Fluxes
on Moist Baroclinic Development in an Idealized Framework, J. Atmos. Sci.,
77, 3211–3225, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0328.1, 2020. a
Hoskins, B., McIntyre, M., and Robertson, W.: On the use and significance of
isentropic potential vorticity maps, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111,
877–946, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711147002, 1985. a, b, c
Houchi, K., Stoffelen, A., Marseille, G. J., and De Kloe, J.: Comparison of wind
and wind shear climatologies derived from high-resolution radiosondes and the
ECMWF model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D22123, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013196, 2010. a
Juckes, M.: Quasigeostrophic dynamics of the tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 51,
2756–2768, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2756:QDOTT>2.0.CO;2, 1994. a
Kawatani, Y., Hamilton, K., Gray, L. J., Osprey, S. M., Watanabe, S., and
Yamashita, Y.: The effects of a well-resolved stratosphere on the simulated
boreal winter circulation in a climate model, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1203–1226,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0206.1, 2019. a
Kidston, J., Scaife, A. A., Hardiman, S. C., Mitchell, D. M., Butchart, N.,
Baldwin, M. P., and Gray, L. J.: Stratospheric influence on tropospheric jet
streams, storm tracks and surface weather, Nat. Geosci., 8, 433–440,
https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2424, 2015. a
Lindzen, R. and Farrell, B.: A simple approximate result for the maximum growth
rate of baroclinic instabilities, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1648–1654,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<1648:ASARFT>2.0.CO;2, 1980. a
Lorenz, E. N.: Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general
circulation, Tellus, 7, 157–167, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i2.8796,
1955. a
Mak, M.: Cyclogenesis in a conditionally unstable moist baroclinic atmosphere,
Tellus, 46, 14–33, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v46i1.15424, 1994. a, b, c, d
Mak, M.: Influence of Surface Sensible Heat Flux on Incipient Marine
Cyclogenesis, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 820–834,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0820:IOSSHF>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Mak, M., Zhao, S., and Deng, Y.: Charney Problem with a Generic Stratosphere,
J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 1021–1037, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0027.1, 2021. a
Manabe, S.: On the contribution of heat released by condensation to the change
in pressure pattern, J. Met. Soc. Japan, 34, 308–320,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1923.34.6_308, 1956. a
Marshall, A. G. and Scaife, A. A.: Improved predictability of stratospheric
sudden warming events in an atmospheric general circulation model with
enhanced stratospheric resolution, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012643, 2010. a
Martínez-Alvarado, O., Madonna, E., Gray, S. L., and Joos, H.: A route to
systematic error in forecasts of Rossby waves, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 142, 196–210, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2645, 2016. a
Moore, R. W. and Montgomery, M. T.: Reexamining the dynamics of short-scale,
diabatic Rossby waves and their role in midlatitude moist cyclogenesis, J.
Atmos. Sci., 61, 754–768,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0754:RTDOSD>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Osprey, S. M., Gray, L. J., Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., and Hinton, T. J.:
Stratospheric variability in twentieth-century CMIP5 simulations of the Met
Office climate model: High top versus low top, J. Climate, 26, 1595–1606,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00147.1, 2013. a
Pilch Kedzierski, R., Neef, L., and Matthes, K.: Tropopause sharpening by
data assimilation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8298–8305,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069936, 2016. a, b, c
Plougonven, R. and Vanneste, J.: Quasi-geostrophic dynamics of a finite-thickness
tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3149–3163, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3502.1, 2010. a, b
Rivest, C., Davis, C., and Farrell, B.: Upper-tropospheric synoptic-scale
waves. Part I: Maintenance as Eady normal modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 49,
2108–2119, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2108:UTSSWP>2.0.CO;2, 1992. a, b, c
Robinson, W. A.: On the structure of potential vorticity in baroclinic
instability, Tellus, 41, 275–284, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v41i4.11840,
1989. a
Rupp, P. and Birner, T.: Tropospheric eddy feedback to different stratospheric conditions in idealised baroclinic life cycles, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 111–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-111-2021, 2021. a, b, c
Saffin, L., Gray, S. L., Methven, J., and Williams, K. D.: Processes
Maintaining Tropopause Sharpness in Numerical Models, J. Geophys. Res., 122,
9611–9627, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026879, 2017. a
Schäfler, A., Craig, G., Wernli, H., Arbogast, P., Doyle, J. D.,
Mctaggart-Cowan, R., Methven, J., Rivière, G., Ament, F., Boettcher,
M., Bramberger, M., Cazenave, Q., Cotton, R., Crewell, S., Delanoë, J.,
DörnbrAck, A., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F., Fix, A., Grams, C. M., Gray,
S. L., Grob, H., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Harvey, B., Hirsch, L., Jacob, M.,
Kölling, T., Konow, H., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Magnusson, L., Mayer, B.,
Mech, M., Moore, R., Pelon, J., Quinting, J., Rahm, S., Rapp, M., Rautenhaus,
M., Reitebuch, O., Reynolds, C. A., Sodemann, H., Spengler, T., Vaughan, G.,
Wendisch, M., Wirth, M., Witschas, B., Wolf, K., and Zinner, T.: The north
atlantic waveguide and downstream impact experiment, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 99, 1607–1637, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1, 2018. a
Schäfler, A., Harvey, B., Methven, J., Doyle, J. D., Rahm, S., Reitebuch,
O., Weiler, F., and Witschas, B.: Observation of jet stream winds during
NAWDEX and characterization of systematic meteorological analysis errors,
Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 2889–2907, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0229.1, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Snyder, C. and Lindzen, R. S.: Quasi-geostrophic wave-CISK in an unbounded
baroclinic shear, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 76–86,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0076:QGWCIA>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Wirth, V., Riemer, M., Chang, E. K., and Martius, O.: Rossby wave packets on
the midlatitude waveguide – A review, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 1965–2001,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0483.1, 2018. a
Short summary
Given the recent focus on the influence of upper tropospheric structure in wind and temperature on midlatitude weather, we use an idealised model to investigate how structural modifications impact cyclone development. We find that cyclone intensification is less sensitive to these modifications than to changes in the amount of cloud condensation, suggesting that an accurate representation of the upper-level troposphere is less important for midlatitude weather than previously anticipated.
Given the recent focus on the influence of upper tropospheric structure in wind and temperature...