Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-387-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-387-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Apr 2025
Research article |
| 11 Apr 2025
| 11 Apr 2025
An ERA5 climatology of synoptic-scale negative potential vorticity–jet interactions over the western North Atlantic
Alexander Lojko
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
now at: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Andrew C. Winters
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Annika Oertel
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research Troposphere Research (IMKTRO), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, 76131, Germany
Christiane Jablonowski
Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Ashley E. Payne
Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Tomorrow.io, 9 Channel Center St, 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02210, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Cornelis Schwenk, Annette Miltenberger, and Annika Oertel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 11333–11361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11333-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11333-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how different parameter choices concerning cloud processes affect the simulated transport of water and ice into the upper atmosphere (which affects the greenhouse effect) during a weather system called a warm conveyor belt. Using a set of model experiments, we found that some parameters have a strong effect on humidity and ice, especially during fast ascents. These findings could help improve weather and climate models and may also be relevant for future climate engineering studies.
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Thomas Ehrmann, Diana Bull, Benjamin Wagman, and Benjamin Hillman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 11025–11049, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11025-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11025-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations of the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption are used to study how radiative heating by volcanic aerosols alters stratospheric winds. We found that heating of the tropical stratosphere by volcanic aerosols drives increased wind speeds in the midlatitude vortex region. A theoretical framework is then used to identify the dynamical origin of these enhanced winds, which we find to be a combination of a strengthened global circulation and a modification of large-scale atmospheric waves.
Ken S. Carslaw, Leighton A. Regayre, Ulrike Proske, Andrew Gettelman, David M. H. Sexton, Yun Qian, Lauren Marshall, Oliver Wild, Marcus van Lier-Walqui, Annika Oertel, Saloua Peatier, Ben Yang, Jill S. Johnson, Sihan Li, Daniel T. McCoy, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Christina J. Williamson, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Kuniko Yamazaki, and Ben B. B. Booth
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4341, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4341, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
A major challenge in climate science is reducing projection uncertainty despite advances in models and observational constraints. Perturbed parameter ensembles (PPEs) offer a powerful tool to explore and reduce uncertainty by revealing model weaknesses and guiding development. PPEs are now widely applied across climate systems and scales. We argue they should be prioritized alongside complexity and resolution in model resource planning.
Gabriella Wallentin, Annika Oertel, Luisa Ickes, Peggy Achtert, Matthias Tesche, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6607–6631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multilayer clouds are common in the Arctic but remain underrepresented. We use an atmospheric model to simulate multilayer cloud cases from the Arctic expedition MOSAiC 2019/2020. We find that it is complex to accurately model these cloud layers due to the lack of correct temperature profiles. The model also struggles to capture the observed cloud phase and the relative concentration of cloud droplets and cloud ice. We constrain our model to measured aerosols to mitigate this issue.
Svenja Christ, Marta Wenta, Christian M. Grams, and Annika Oertel
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 17–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-17-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-17-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The detailed representation of sea surface temperature (SST) in numerical models is important for the prediction of atmospheric blocking in the North Atlantic. Yet the underlying physical processes are not fully understood. Using SST sensitivity experiments for a case study, we identify a physical pathway through which SST in the Gulf Stream region is linked to the downstream upper-level flow evolution in the North Atlantic.
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Hunter Y. Brown, Benjamin R. Hillman, Diana L. Bull, and Joseph L. Hart
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5913–5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large volcanic eruptions deposit material in the upper atmosphere, which is capable of altering temperature and wind patterns of Earth's atmosphere for subsequent years. This research describes a new method of simulating these effects in an idealized, efficient atmospheric model. A volcanic eruption of sulfur dioxide is described with a simplified set of physical rules, which eventually cools the planetary surface. This model has been designed as a test bed for climate attribution studies.
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate simulation of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential to understanding their behavior in a changing climate. One way this is accomplished is through model intercomparison projects, where results from multiple climate models are analyzed to provide benchmark solutions for the wider climate modeling community. This study describes and analyzes the previously developed TC test case for nine climate models in an intercomparison project, providing solutions that aid in model development.
Owen K. Hughes and Christiane Jablonowski
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6805–6831, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6805-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6805-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric models benefit from idealized tests that assess their accuracy in a simpler simulation. A new test with artificial mountains is developed for models on a spherical earth. The mountains trigger the development of both planetary-scale and small-scale waves. These can be analyzed in dry or moist environments, with a simple rainfall mechanism. Four atmospheric models are intercompared. This sheds light on the pros and cons of the model design and the impact of mountains on the flow.
Christoph Neuhauser, Maicon Hieronymus, Michael Kern, Marc Rautenhaus, Annika Oertel, and Rüdiger Westermann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4617–4638, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4617-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical weather prediction models rely on parameterizations for sub-grid-scale processes, which are a source of uncertainty. We present novel visual analytics solutions to analyze interactively the sensitivities of a selected prognostic variable to multiple model parameters along trajectories regarding similarities in temporal development and spatiotemporal relationships. The proposed workflow is applied to cloud microphysical sensitivities along coherent strongly ascending trajectories.
Andreas A. Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Tim Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4427–4450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the benefit of objective 3-D front detection with modern interactive visual analysis techniques for case studies of extra-tropical cyclones and comparisons of frontal structures between different numerical weather prediction models. The 3-D frontal structures show agreement with 2-D fronts from surface analysis charts and augment them in the vertical dimension. We see great potential for more complex studies of atmospheric dynamics and for operational weather forecasting.
Annika Oertel, Annette K. Miltenberger, Christian M. Grams, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8553–8581, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) are cloud- and precipitation-producing airstreams in extratropical cyclones that are important for the large-scale flow and cloud radiative forcing. We analyze cloud formation processes during WCB ascent in a two-moment microphysics scheme. Quantification of individual diabatic heating rates shows the importance of condensation, vapor deposition, rain evaporation, melting, and cloud-top radiative cooling for total heating and WCB-related potential vorticity structure.
Qi Tang, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Luke P. Van Roekel, Mark A. Taylor, Wuyin Lin, Benjamin R. Hillman, Paul A. Ullrich, Andrew M. Bradley, Oksana Guba, Jonathan D. Wolfe, Tian Zhou, Kai Zhang, Xue Zheng, Yunyan Zhang, Meng Zhang, Mingxuan Wu, Hailong Wang, Cheng Tao, Balwinder Singh, Alan M. Rhoades, Yi Qin, Hong-Yi Li, Yan Feng, Yuying Zhang, Chengzhu Zhang, Charles S. Zender, Shaocheng Xie, Erika L. Roesler, Andrew F. Roberts, Azamat Mametjanov, Mathew E. Maltrud, Noel D. Keen, Robert L. Jacob, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, Ryan M. Forsyth, Alan V. Di Vittorio, Peter M. Caldwell, Gautam Bisht, Renata B. McCoy, L. Ruby Leung, and David C. Bader
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3953–3995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3953-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
High-resolution simulations are superior to low-resolution ones in capturing regional climate changes and climate extremes. However, uniformly reducing the grid size of a global Earth system model is too computationally expensive. We provide an overview of the fully coupled regionally refined model (RRM) of E3SMv2 and document a first-of-its-kind set of climate production simulations using RRM at an economic cost. The key to this success is our innovative hybrid time step method.
Michelle L. Maclennan, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Christine A. Shields, Andrew O. Hoffman, Nander Wever, Megan Thompson-Munson, Andrew C. Winters, Erin C. Pettit, Theodore A. Scambos, and Jonathan D. Wille
The Cryosphere, 17, 865–881, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric rivers are air masses that transport large amounts of moisture and heat towards the poles. Here, we use a combination of weather observations and models to quantify the amount of snowfall caused by atmospheric rivers in West Antarctica which is about 10 % of the total snowfall each year. We then examine a unique event that occurred in early February 2020, when three atmospheric rivers made landfall over West Antarctica in rapid succession, leading to heavy snowfall and surface melt.
Andreas Alexander Beckert, Lea Eisenstein, Annika Oertel, Timothy Hewson, George C. Craig, and Marc Rautenhaus
Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2022-36, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study revises and extends a previously presented 3-D objective front detection method and demonstrates its benefits to analyse weather dynamics in numerical simulation data. Based on two case studies of extratropical cyclones, we demonstrate the evaluation of conceptual models from dynamic meteorology, illustrate the benefits of our interactive analysis approach by comparing fronts in data with different model resolutions, and study the impact of convection on fronts.
Julian F. Quinting, Christian M. Grams, Annika Oertel, and Moritz Pickl
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 731–744, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-731-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-731-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study applies novel artificial-intelligence-based models that allow the identification of one specific weather system which affects the midlatitude circulation. We show that the models yield similar results as their trajectory-based counterpart, which requires data at higher spatiotemporal resolution and is computationally more expensive. Overall, we aim to show how deep learning methods can be used efficiently to support process understanding of biases in weather prediction models.
Annika Oertel, Michael Sprenger, Hanna Joos, Maxi Boettcher, Heike Konow, Martin Hagen, and Heini Wernli
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 89–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-89-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-89-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Convection embedded in the stratiform cloud band of strongly ascending airstreams in extratropical cyclones (so-called warm conveyor belts) can influence not only surface precipitation but also the
upper-tropospheric potential vorticity (PV) and waveguide. The comparison of intense vs. moderate embedded convection shows that its strength alone is not a reliable measure for upper-tropospheric PV modification. Instead, characteristics of the ambient flow co-determine its dynamical significance.
Cited articles
Archambault, H. M., Bosart, L. F., Keyser, D., and Cordeira, J. M.: A climatological analysis of the extratropical flow response to recurving western North Pacific tropical cyclones, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2325–2346, 2013. a
Barnes, E. A., Hartmann, D. L., Frierson, D. M., and Kidston, J.: Effect of latitude on the persistence of eddy-driven jets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043199, 2010. a, b
Bennetts, D. A. and Hoskins, B.: Conditional symmetric instability-a possible explanation for frontal rainbands, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 105, 945–962, 1979. a
Berman, J. D. and Torn, R. D.: The impact of initial condition and warm conveyor belt forecast uncertainty on variability in the downstream waveguide in an ECWMF case study, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 4071–4089, 2019. a
Blanchard, N., Pantillon, F., Chaboureau, J.-P., and Delanoë, J.: Mid-level convection in a warm conveyor belt accelerates the jet stream, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-37-2021, 2021. a
Bony, S., Stevens, B., Frierson, D. M., Jakob, C., Kageyama, M., Pincus, R., Shepherd, T. G., Sherwood, S. C., Siebesma, A. P., Sobel, A. H., Watanabe, M., and Webb, M. J.: Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity, Nat. Geosci., 8, 261–268, 2015. a
Ceppi, P., Brient, F., Zelinka, M. D., and Hartmann, D. L.: Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models, WIREs Clim. Change, 8, e465, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.465, 2017. a
Conzemius, R. J. and Montgomery, M. T.: Clarification on the generation of absolute and potential vorticity in mesoscale convective vortices, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7591–7605, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7591-2009, 2009. a
Dacre, H. F., Martinez-Alvarado, O., and Mbengue, C. O.: Linking atmospheric rivers and warm conveyor belt airflows, J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 1183–1196, 2019. a
Davies-Jones, R.: Streamwise vorticity: the origin of updraft rotation in supercell storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2991–3006, 1984. a
Davis, C. A. and Emanuel, K. A.: Potential vorticity diagnostics of cyclogenesis, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 1929–1953, 1991. a
Davis, C. A., Stoelinga, M. T., and Kuo, Y.-H.: The integrated effect of condensation in numerical simulations of extratropical cyclogenesis, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 2309–2330, 1993. a
Dawson, A.: Windspharm: a high-level library for global wind field computations using spherical harmonics, Journal of Open Research Software, 4, e31, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.129, 2016. a
Evans, C.: evans36/miscellany, GitHub [code], https://github.com/evans36/miscellany/blob/main/Vorticity and Divergence Inversion.ipynb (last access: 3 April 2025), 2023. a
Grams, C. M., Magnusson, L., and Madonna, E.: An atmospheric dynamics perspective on the amplification and propagation of forecast error in numerical weather prediction models: a case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2577–2591, 2018. a
Gray, M.: An investigation into convectively generated potential-vorticity anomalies using a mass-forcing model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1589–1605, 1999. a
Gray, S. L., Dunning, C., Methven, J., Masato, G., and Chagnon, J. M.: Systematic model forecast error in Rossby wave structure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2979–2987, 2014. a
Grazzini, F. and Vitart, F.: Atmospheric predictability and Rossby wave packets, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 2793–2802, 2015. a
Grazzini, F., Craig, G. C., Keil, C., Antolini, G., and Pavan, V.: Extreme precipitation events over northern Italy. Part I: A systematic classification with machine-learning techniques, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 69–85, 2020. a
Haren, R., Camphuijsen, J., Dzigan, Y., Drost, N., Alidoost, F., Andela, B., Aerts, J., Weel, B., Hut, R., Zimmermann, K., Kalverla, P., Vreede, B., Paçal, A., Smeets, S., Verhoeven, S., Malinina, E., and Schilperoort, B.: era5cli, Version v2.0.0, Zenodo [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844544, 2025. a
Harvey, B. J., Methven, J., and Ambaum, M. H.: Rossby wave propagation on potential vorticity fronts with finite width, J. Fluid Mech., 794, 775–797, 2016. a
Haynes, P. H. and McIntyre, M.: On the conservation and impermeability theorems for potential vorticity, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2021–2031, 1990. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a, b
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6, 2023. a
Hertenstein, R. F. and Schubert, W. H.: Potential vorticity anomalies associated with squall lines, Mon. Weather Rev., 119, 1663–1672, 1991. a
Joos, H., Sprenger, M., Binder, H., Beyerle, U., and Wernli, H.: Warm conveyor belts in present-day and future climate simulations – Part 1: Climatology and impacts, Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 133–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-133-2023, 2023. a, b
Keller, J. H., Grams, C. M., Riemer, M., Archambault, H. M., Bosart, L., Doyle, J. D., Evans, J. L., Galarneau, T. J., Griffin, K., Harr, P. A., Kitabatake, N., McTaggart-Cowan, R., Pantillon, F., Quinting, J. F., Reynolds, C. A., Ritchie, E. A., Torn, R. D., and Zhang, F: The extratropical transition of tropical cyclones. Part II: Interaction with the midlatitude flow, downstream impacts, and implications for predictability, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 1077–1106, 2019. a
Lee, S. H., Williams, P. D., and Frame, T. H.: Increased shear in the North Atlantic upper-level jet stream over the past four decades, Nature, 572, 639–642, 2019. a
Li, J., Feng, Z., Qian, Y., and Leung, L. R.: A high-resolution unified observational data product of mesoscale convective systems and isolated deep convection in the United States for 2004–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 827–856, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-827-2021, 2021. a
Liu, N., Leung, L. R., and Feng, Z.: Global mesoscale convective system latent heating characteristics from GPM retrievals and an MCS tracking dataset, J. Climate, 34, 8599–8613, 2021. a
Lorenz, D. J. and Hartmann, D. L.: Eddy–zonal flow feedback in the Northern Hemisphere winter, J. Climate, 16, 1212–1227, 2003. a
Lojko, A.: AlexLojko/NPV_Algorithm, GitHub [code], https://github.com/AlexLojko/NPV_Algorithm/blob/main/NPV_jet_ID_algorithm_AL.ipynb (last access: 3 April 2025), 2024. a
Martin, J. E.: Quasi-geostrophic diagnosis of the influence of vorticity advection on the development of upper level jet-front systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 2658–2671, 2014. a
Minobe, S., Kuwano-Yoshida, A., Komori, N., Xie, S.-P., and Small, R. J.: Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere, Nature, 452, 206–209, 2008. a
Müller, A., Niedrich, B., and Névir, P.: Three-dimensional potential vorticity structures for extreme precipitation events on the convective scale, Tellus A, 72, 1–20, 2020. a
Oertel, A., Boettcher, M., Joos, H., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: Potential vorticity structure of embedded convection in a warm conveyor belt and its relevance for large-scale dynamics, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 127–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-127-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
Oertel, A., Sprenger, M., Joos, H., Boettcher, M., Konow, H., Hagen, M., and Wernli, H.: Observations and simulation of intense convection embedded in a warm conveyor belt – how ambient vertical wind shear determines the dynamical impact, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 89–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-89-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Orlanski, I. and Katzfey, J.: The life cycle of a cyclone wave in the Southern Hemisphere. Part I: Eddy energy budget, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1972–1998, 1991. a
O'Brien, T. A., Loring, B., Dufek, A. S., Islam, M. R., Kamnani, D., Quagraine, K. T., and Kirkpatrick, C.: Atmospheric rivers in the eastern and midwestern United States associated with baroclinic waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107236, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107236, 2024. a
Pfahl, S., Schwierz, C., Croci-Maspoli, M., Grams, C. M., and Wernli, H.: Importance of latent heat release in ascending air streams for atmospheric blocking, Nat. Geosci., 8, 610–614, 2015. a
Pohorsky, R., Röthlisberger, M., Grams, C. M., Riboldi, J., and Martius, O.: The climatological impact of recurving North Atlantic tropical cyclones on downstream extreme precipitation events, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 1513–1532, 2019. a
Prince, K. C. and Evans, C.: Convectively generated negative potential vorticity enhancing the jet stream through an inverse energy cascade during the extratropical transition of hurricane Irma, J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 2901–2918, 2022. a
Prosser, M. C., Williams, P. D., Marlton, G. J., and Harrison, R. G.: Evidence for large increases in clear-air turbulence over the past four decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103814, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103814, 2023. a, b
Rasmussen, R., Chen, F., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Prein, A., Kim, J., Schneider, T., Dai, A., Gochis, D., Dugger, A., Zhang, Y., Jaye, A., Dudhia, J., He, C., Harrold, M., Xue, L., Chen, S., Newman, A., Dougherty, E., Abolafia-Rosenzweig, R., Lybarger, N. D., Viger, R., Lesmes, D., Skalak, K., Brakebill, J., Cline, D., Dunne, K., Rasmussen, K., and Miguez-Macho, G.: CONUS404: The NCAR–USGS 4-km long-term regional hydroclimate reanalysis over the CONUS, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E1382–E1408, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0326.1, 2023. a
Rodwell, M. J., Magnusson, L., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Bonavita, M., Cardinali, C., Diamantakis, M., Earnshaw, P., Garcia-Mendez, A., Isaksen, L., Källén, E., Klocke, D., Lopez, P., McNally, T., Persson, A., Prates, F., and Wedi, N.: Characteristics of occasional poor medium-range weather forecasts for Europe, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1393–1405, 2013. a
Röthlisberger, M., Martius, O., and Wernli, H.: Northern Hemisphere Rossby wave initiation events on the extratropical jet – A climatological analysis, J. Climate, 31, 743–760, 2018. a
Rowe, S. M. and Hitchman, M. H.: On the role of inertial instability in stratosphere–troposphere exchange near midlatitude cyclones, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 2131–2151, 2015. a
Shaw, T. A. and Miyawaki, O.: Fast upper-level jet stream winds get faster under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 61–67, 2024. a
Spreitzer, E., Attinger, R., Boettcher, M., Forbes, R., Wernli, H., and Joos, H.: Modification of potential vorticity near the tropopause by nonconservative processes in the ECMWF model, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1709–1726, 2019. a
Tenenbaum, J., Williams, P. D., Turp, D., Buchanan, P., Coulson, R., Gill, P. G., Lunnon, R. W., Oztunali, M. G., Rankin, J., and Rukhovets, L.: Aircraft observations and reanalysis depictions of trends in the North Atlantic winter jet stream wind speeds and turbulence, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 148, 2927–2941, 2022. a, b
Teubler, F. and Riemer, M.: Potential-vorticity dynamics of troughs and ridges within Rossby wave packets during a 40-year reanalysis period, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 535–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-535-2021, 2021. a
Thompson, C. F. and Schultz, D. M.: The release of inertial instability near an idealized zonal jet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092649, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092649, 2021. a
Trier, S. B. and Sharman, R. D.: Mechanisms influencing cirrus banding and aviation turbulence near a convectively enhanced upper-level jet stream, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 3003–3027, 2016. a
Volonté, A., Clark, P. A., and Gray, S. L.: The role of mesoscale instabilities in the sting-jet dynamics of windstorm Tini, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 877–899, 2018. a
Weijenborg, C., Friederichs, P., and Hense, A.: Organisation of potential vorticity on the mesoscale during deep moist convection, Tellus A, 67, 25705, 2015. a
Wilks, D.: “The stippling shows statistically significant grid points”: How research results are routinely overstated and overinterpreted, and what to do about it, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 2263–2273, 2016. a
Woollings, T., Papritz, L., Mbengue, C., and Spengler, T.: Diabatic heating and jet stream shifts: a case study of the 2010 negative North Atlantic Oscillation winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9994–10002, 2016. a
Short summary
Convective storms can produce intense anticyclonically rotating vortices (~10 km) defined by negative potential vorticity (NPV), which can elongate to larger scales (~1000 km). Our composite analysis shows that elongated NPV frequently occurs along the western North Atlantic tropopause, where we observed it enhancing jet stream kinematics. Elongated NPV may impinge on aviation turbulence and weather forecasting despite its small-scale origin.
Convective storms can produce intense anticyclonically rotating vortices (~10 km) defined by...
